| Literature DB >> 31948129 |
Mariusz Mojzych1, Zofia Bernat1, Zbigniew Karczmarzyk1, Joanna Matysiak2, Andrzej Fruziński3.
Abstract
A series of new pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine acyclonucleosides 2-5 and 8 were prepared and evaluated for their anticancer activity against human cancer cell lines (MCF-7, K-562) and CDK2/E, as well as Abl protein kinases inhibitors. Lipophilicity of the compounds was determined using C-18 and immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) chromatography. In order to confirm the molecular structures and synthesis pathway of new acyclonucleosides, X-ray analysis was performed for model compound 3. Theoretical calculations at the DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level were used for the characterization of electronic structures of 1-8. The potential antiviral activity of acyclonucleosides 2-8 was tested in silico using molecular docking method.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray analysis; acyclonucleosides; anticancer activity; molecular docking; pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine; theoretical calculation
Year: 2020 PMID: 31948129 PMCID: PMC6982861 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Known acyclonucleosides.
Scheme 1Synthetic pathway to pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine acyclonucleosides.
Protein kinase inhibitory activity and the cytotoxic activity of tested pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazines and standard after 72 h incubation.
| Comp. | MTT Assay a, IC50 (µM) | IC50 (µM) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-562 | MCF7 | CDK2/Cyclin E | Abl | |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >50 | >50 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 42 | 11 | 0.1 | >100 |
|
| 0.5 | >10 | >100 | 0.2 |
a All experiments were performed as described in the literature [30].
Figure 2UV–Vis spectra of compounds 1 and 2 in aqueous methanol solution of different pH values.
Lipophilicity parameters of compounds: log kw and S values (Equation (1)) obtained by RP-18 HPLC chromatography.
| Comp. | pH = 7.4 | pH = 4 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | log kw | R2 |
| S | log kw | R2 |
| |
|
| −3.480 | 2.000 | 0.986 | 6 | −2.708 | 1.328 | 0.979 | 7 |
|
| −2.127 | 1.120 | 0.988 | 7 | −3.144 | 1.482 | 0.978 | 6 |
|
| −1.697 | 0.707 | 0.981 | 7 | −2.828 | 1.013 | 0.979 | 6 |
|
| −1.999 | 0.957 | 0.988 | 8 | −3.089 | 1.281 | 0.979 | 7 |
|
| −1.671 | 0.619 | 0.988 | 7 | −3.001 | 0.800 | 0.978 | 7 |
|
| −3.237 | 2.293 | 0.992 | 5 | −3.731 | 2.485 | 0.976 | 6 |
|
| −3.105 | 1.690 | 0.968 | 8 | −4.150 | 2.856 | 0.978 | 7 |
|
| −2.356 | 1.281 | 0.997 | 7 | −3.649 | 1.828 | 0.988 | 6 |
Log kw(IAM) and S parameters of Equation (1) for the compounds obtained by IAM chromatography and their in silico descriptors.
| Comp. | IAM Chromatography | Molecular Descriptors a | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | log kw(IAM) | R2 |
| log P | MR (cm3/mol) | tPSA (Å2) | Clog P | |
|
| −3.023 | 0.930 | 0.986 | 6 | 1.58 | 50.33 | 61.47 | 1.042 |
|
| −2.876 | 0.488 | 0.985 | 6 | 1.40 | 61.5 | 72.91 | −0.189 |
|
| −2.671 | 0.380 | 0.953 | 6 | 1.86 | - | 72.91 | −0.189 |
|
| −2.754 | 0.354 | 0.967 | 6 | 0.86 | 67.56 | 93.14 | −0.514 |
|
| 2.804 | 0.316 | 0.980 | 6 | 1.33 | - | 93.14 | −0.514 |
|
| −4.022 | 1.416 | 0.996 | 6 | 2.75 | 67.6 | 52.68 | 1.235 |
|
| −4.414 | 1.072 | 0.998 | 6 | 2.59 | 96.27 | 105.28 | 1.245 |
|
| −3.365 | 0.688 | 0.981 | 6 | 1.21 | 76.84 | 93.14 | −0.830 |
a the log P (two different approaches); MR—molar refractivity; tPSA—polar surface area.
Figure 3A view of the molecule (3), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Total energy, ET (kcal/mol.), dipole moment, MD (D), energy of HOMO, EHOMO, and LUMO, ELUMO, orbitals (kcal/mol), ΔE = ELUMO − EHOMO (kcal/mol) and ionization potential, IP (kcal/mol), for 1–8 calculated at DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level.
| Comp. | ET | MD | EHOMO | ELUMO | ΔE | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −594977.010 | 3.100 | −149.433 | −65.448 | 83.985 | 149.433 |
|
| −664394.616 | 3.791 | −146.860 | −63.817 | 83.043 | 146.860 |
|
| −664388.197 | 8.420 | −142.173 | −59.619 | 82.554 | 142.173 |
|
| −736287.198 | 3.993 | −143.246 | −59.506 | 83.740 | 143.246 |
|
| −736278.707 | 7.582 | −142.619 | −60.039 | 82.580 | 142.619 |
|
| −2232635.401 | 3.992 | −149.941 | −67.393 | 82.548 | 149.941 |
|
| −1023996.125 | 3.361 | −146.948 | −64.155 | 82.793 | 146.948 |
|
| −823197.681 | 6.008 | −146.672 | −63.779 | 82.893 | 146.672 |
Figure 4The molecules 1–8 with the vectors of dipole moment in the low-energy conformation obtained from calculations at the DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level.
Net atomic charges (e) on the atoms in the 3-methyl–5-methylsulfanyl-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazine system of molecules 1–8 calculated using NBO method at the DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level.
| Atom | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | −0.189 | −0.193 | −0.145 | −0.188 | −0.147 | −0.193 | −0.197 | −0.194 |
| N2 | −0.256 | −0.257 | −0.250 | −0.258 | −0.250 | −0.254 | −0.258 | −0.257 |
| C3 | +0.215 | +0.213 | +0.216 | +0.214 | +0.216 | +0.213 | +0.214 | +0.213 |
| N4 | −0.463 | −0.462 | −0.478 | −0.463 | −0.478 | −0.468 | −0.461 | −0.462 |
| C5 | +0.122 | +0.121 | +0.081 | +0.122 | +0.001 | +0.123 | +0.123 | +0.122 |
| C6 | +0.288 | +0.306 | +0.251 | +0.315 | +0.252 | +0.308 | +0.306 | +0.305 |
| N7 | −0.357 | −0.234 | −0.286 | −0.228 | −0.289 | −0.237 | −0.230 | −0.230 |
| N8 | −0.234 | −0.236 | −0.167 | −0.238 | −0.162 | −0.237 | −0.231 | −0.235 |
| C9 | +0.148 | +0.147 | +0.175 | +0.150 | +0.174 | +0.152 | +0.148 | +0.145 |
| C12 | −0.604 | −0.602 | −0.617 | −0.602 | −0.616 | −0.603 | −0.602 | −0.602 |
| S1 | +0.300 | +0.296 | +0.302 | +0.293 | +0.302 | +0.301 | +0.296 | +0.296 |
| C13 | −0.701 | −0.701 | −0.703 | −0.701 | −0.703 | −0.701 | −0.701 | −0.701 |
The results of the molecular docking of ligands 1–8 and aciclovir molecule (Ac) to the TK.
| Comp. | ChemPLP | Interactions |
|---|---|---|
|
| 43.24 | - |
|
| 54.01 | - |
|
| 54.93 | C13…O (GLN125A); N1…O (TYR132A); O…O (GLU83A); |
|
| 64.17 | O…O (GLN125A); O…N (GLN125A); O’…N (ARG176A) |
|
| 58.68 | S1…C(MET128A); S1…C (ALA168A); S1…C (ALA169A); |
|
| 55.22 | - |
|
| S1…C (ILE100A); O…C (MET128A); O’…N (ARG163A); | |
|
| 64.74 | C12…C (ALA168A); N8…O (TYR132A); O…N (ARG163A) |
|
| 77.94 | N(amino)…O (GLN125A); N1…O (GLN125A); O6…N (ARG176A); |
Figure 5A view of the interaction of (a) 8 and (b) Ac with amino acids of binding site in TK.