| Literature DB >> 31947886 |
Peter Piko1, Szilvia Fiatal2,3, Nardos Abebe Werissa1,4, Bayu Begashaw Bekele4, Gabor Racz2, Zsigmond Kosa5, Janos Sandor2,3, Roza Adany1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The triglycerides (TG) to high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (TG/HDL-C) is a well-known predictor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) with great heritability background. The cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and hepatic lipase (LIPC) gene affect TG/HDL-C ratio. This study aims to explore the association between haplotypes (H) in CETP (based on 5 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) and LIPC (based on 6 SNPs) genes and the TG/HDL-C ratio and its components, among Roma and Hungarian general populations.Entities:
Keywords: CETP; Hungarian general; LIPC; Roma; TG/HDL-C ratio; cardiometabolic risk; haplotype; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; single nucleotide polymorphism; triglyceride
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947886 PMCID: PMC7016864 DOI: 10.3390/genes11010056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Demographic characteristics of the study populations.
| Hungarian General | Roma | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95% CI) | |||
| Age (year) | 44.16 (43.53–44.78) | 40.3 (39.39–41.21) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 27.43 (27.15–27.70) | 27.47 (26.64–28.30) | 0.898 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 126.81 (125.95–127.66) | 125.21 (123.67–126.76) | 0.059 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 80.26 (79.79–80.72) | 78.43 (77.63–79.23) | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose level (mmol/L) | 4.83 (4.74–4.92) | 5.44 (5.29–5.59) | <0.001 |
| High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level (mmol/L) | 1.43 (1.40–1.45) | 1.21 (1.18–1.24) | <0.001 |
| Triglyceride (TG) level (mmol/L) | 1.63 (1.55–1.72) | 1.61 (1.50–1.71) | 0.760 |
| Triglycerides to HDL-C ratio (TG/HDL-C) ratio | 1.48 (1.35–1.61) | 1.67 (1.47–1.86) | 0.115 |
| Prevalence (%) | |||
| Sex (female/male) | 52.7/47.3 | 61.7/38.3 | <0.001 |
| Antihypertensive treatment | 29.90 | 25.40 | 0.042 |
| Lipid-lowering treatment | 13.90 | 10.80 | 0.050 |
| Antidiabetic treatment | 5.40 | 5.20 | 0.901 |
| Reduced HDL-C level 1 | 28.20 | 53.00 | <0.001 |
| Elevated TG level 2 | 30.32 | 28.71 | 0.463 |
| Elevated TG/HDL-C ratio (≥1) 3 | 42.44 | 53.83 | <0.001 |
| Highly elevated TG/HDL-C ratio (>4) 4 | 5.09 | 5.87 | 0.465 |
1 Reduced HDL-C level: <1.03 mmol/L in male and <1.29 mmol/L in female. 2 Elevated TG level: ≥1.7 mmol/L in both sexes. 3 TG/HDL-C ratio cut-off for increased cardiometabolic risk (CMR) by Qurat et al. [21]. 4 TG/HDL-C ratio cut-off for extensive coronary disease (CD) risk by da Luz et al. [20].
Figure 1Linkage disequilibrium structure of the 5 studied single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CETP and 6 SNPs in LIPC genes in Hungarian Roma (A) and general populations (B).
The frequency of haplotypes in CETP gene in the combined sample, as well as in Roma and Hungarian general populations.
| Haplotypes | Rs1532624 | Rs5882 | Rs708272 | Rs7499892 | Rs9989419 | Frequency in Combined Population ( | Frequency in Hungarian General Population ( | Frequency in Roma Population ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20.57% | 17.32% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19.55% |
| 14.24% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13.98% |
| 11.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13.69% |
| 11.09% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12.63% | 11.60% |
|
|
| H6 | C | G | G | C | A | 5.55% | 5.95% | 4.60% | 0.170 |
| H7 | A | A | A | C | A | 2.77% | 2.92% | 2.43% | 0.467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.26% | 0.14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.60% |
| 1.56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.43% |
| 1.41% |
|
Haplotypes with significantly different frequency in the two populations (p < 0.05) and their frequency with the higher value are highlighted in bold.
The frequency of haplotypes in LIPC gene in the combined sample, as well as in Roma and Hungarian general populations.
| Haplotypes | Rs10468017 | Rs1077834 | Rs1532085 | Rs1800588 | Rs2070895 | Rs4775041 | Frequency in Combined Population | Frequency in Hungaria | Frequency in Roma Population | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 44.41% |
| 34.97% |
|
| H2 | T | T | A | C | G | C | 21.08% | 20.40% | 22.70% | 0.073 |
| H3 | C | C | G | T | A | G | 13.81% | 13.63% | 14.25% | 0.470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10.20% | 7.23% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.69% |
| 2.81% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.43% | 2.08% |
|
|
Haplotypes with significantly different frequency in the two populations (p < 0.05) and their frequency with the higher value are highlighted in bold.
The effect of haplotypes in CETP gene on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels in the combined study population (Hungarian Roma and Hungarian general together). The association was evaluated under adjusted models (ethnicity, sex, age, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose level, antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering treatment).
| Haplotypes | HDL-C | TG | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | OR | β | OR | |||||
| H1 | reference | --- | reference | --- | reference | --- | reference | --- |
| H2 | 0.02 | 0.220 | 0.88 | 0.370 | −0.01 | 0.890 | 0.94 | 0.650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.85 | 0.270 |
| H4 | −0.01 | 0.470 | 0.91 | 0.490 | −0.03 | 0.650 | 1.02 | 0.900 |
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.01 | 0.840 | 0.92 | 0.560 |
| H6 | 0.01 | 0.880 | 0.86 | 0.500 | 0.16 | 0.180 | 0.99 | 0.980 |
| H7 | 0.04 | 0.370 | 0.93 | 0.810 | −0.03 | 0.850 | 0.75 | 0.430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H9 | −0.07 | 0.140 | 1.04 | 0.920 | −0.31 | 0.095 | 0.47 | 0.087 |
| H10 | −0.07 | 0.130 | 1.80 | 0.058 | −0.09 | 0.570 | 1.11 | 0.740 |
At least nominally significant associations between haplotypes and lipid levels (cut-off for HDL-C: <1.03 mmol/L in male and <1.29 mmol/L in female; TG: <1.7 mmol/L in both sexes) are highlighted in bold. * Significant p-values without Bonferroni correction. ** Significant p-values with Bonferroni correction.
The effect of haplotypes in LIPC gene on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) in combined study population (Hungarian Roma and Hungarian general together). The association was evaluated under adjusted models (ethnicity, sex, age, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose level, antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering treatment).
| Haplotypes | HDL-C | TG | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | OR | β | OR | |||||
| H1 | reference | --- | reference | --- | reference | --- | reference | --- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.78 | 0.079 |
|
|
|
|
| H4 | 0.03 | 0.160 | 0.97 | 0.840 | 0.04 | 0.590 | 0.98 | 0.890 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.16 | 0.150 | 1.23 | 0.380 |
|
| 0.05 | 0.170 | 0.91 | 0.680 |
|
|
|
|
At least nominally significant associations between haplotypes and lipid levels (cut-off for HDL-C: <1.03 mmol/L in male and <1.29 mmol/L in female; TG: <1.7 mmol/L in both sexes) are highlighted in bold. * Significant p-value without Bonferroni correction. ** Significant p-values with Bonferroni correction.
The effect of haplotypes in CETP gene on triglycerides to HDL-C ratio (TG/HDL-C ratio) in combined population (Hungarian Roma and Hungarian general together). The association was evaluated under adjusted models (ethnicity, sex, age, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose level, antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering treatment).
| Haplotypes | β (95% CI) | ORCMR a (95% CI) | ORCD b (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | reference | --- | reference | --- | reference | --- |
|
| −0.12 (−0.36–0.13) | 0.350 | 0.82 (0.64–1.06) | 0.130 |
|
|
| H3 | −0.02 (−0.27–0.22) | 0.870 | 0.92 (0.71–1.18) | 0.510 | 0.96 (0.62–1.49) | 0.860 |
| H4 | 0.01 (−0.24–0.25) | 0.970 | 0.98 (0.76–1.26) | 0.850 | 1.05 (0.69–1.58) | 0.820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H6 | 0.24 (−0.17–0.65) | 0.250 | 1.06 (0.70–1.59) | 0.790 | 1.25 (0.66–2.34) | 0.500 |
| H7 | −0.24 (−0.79–0.31) | 0.400 | 0.80 (0.45–1.40) | 0.430 | 0.98 (0.38–2.51) | 0.960 |
| H8 | 0.14 (−0.36–0.64) | 0.580 | 1.27 (0.74–2.17) | 0.390 | 0.88 (0.38–2.02) | 0.760 |
| H9 | −0.05 (−0.67–0.56) | 0.870 | 0.69 (0.36–1.32) | 0.260 | 0.61 (0.15–2.54) | 0.500 |
| H10 | 0.14 (−0.40–0.68) | 0.610 | 1.00 (0.58–1.75) | 0.990 | 1.37 (0.60–3.10) | 0.450 |
At least nominally significant association between haplotypes and TG/HDL-C ratio is highlighted in bold. a TG/HDL-C ratio cut-off for increase cardiometabolic risk (CMR) by Qurat et al. [21]. b TG/HDL-C ratio cut-off for extensive coronary disease (CD) risk by da Luz et al. [20]. * Significant p-values without Bonferroni correction. ** Significant p-values with Bonferroni correction.
The effect of haplotypes in LIPC gene on triglycerides to HDL-C ratio (TG/HDL-C ratio) in combined population (Hungarian Roma and Hungarian general together). The association was evaluated under adjusted models (ethnicity, sex, age, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose level, antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering treatment).
| Haplotypes | β | ORCMR
a | ORCD
b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | reference | --- | reference | --- | reference | --- |
| H2 | 0.07 (−0.12–0.26) | 0.480 | 1.00 (0.82–1.21) | 0.970 | 1.23 (0.89–1.70) | 0.220 |
|
| 0.05 (−0.19–0.29) | 0.690 | 0.99 (0.77–1.27) | 0.940 |
|
|
| H4 | −0.07 (−0.33–0.18) | 0.570 | 0.81 (0.62–1.06) | 0.130 | 1.15 (0.72–1.83) | 0.560 |
| H5 | −0.15 (−0.55–0.24) | 0.440 | 0.95 (0.64–1.42) | 0.820 | 0.36 (0.11–1.19) | 0.093 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.44 (0.68–3.03) | 0.340 |
At least nominally significant association between haplotypes and TG/HDL-C ratio is highlighted in bold. a TG/HDL-C ratio cut-off for increased cardiometabolic risk (CMR) by Qurat et al. [21]. b TG/HDL-C ratio cut-off for extensive coronary disease (CD) risk by da Luz et al. [20]. ** Significant p-values with Bonferroni correction.