| Literature DB >> 25880982 |
Ke Wan1, Jianxun Zhao1, Hao Huang2, Qing Zhang1, Xi Chen1, Zhi Zeng1, Li Zhang1, Yucheng Chen1.
Abstract
AIMS: High triglycerides (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are cardiovascular risk factors. A positive correlation between elevated TG/HDL-C ratio and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events exists in women. However, utility of TG to HDL-C ratio for prediction is unknown among acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25880982 PMCID: PMC4399840 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow chart of eligibility and exclusion of patients.
Baseline characteristics according to the TG/HDL-C ratio.
| Characteristic | Lower (n = 139) | Middle (n = 138) | Upper (n = 139) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.32±8.64 | 63.36±11.34 | 62.76±11.80 | <0.001 |
| Male (%) | 74.8 | 73.2 | 77.0 | 0.766 |
| History of smoking (%) | 56.8 | 59.4 | 66.9 | 0.202 |
| BMI | 23.41±3.35 | 24.37±3.71 | 23.99±2.96 | 0.271 |
| Diabetes (%) | 19.4 | 23.2 | 23.0 | 0.693 |
| Hypertension (%) | 52.5 | 56.5 | 44.6 | 0.13 |
|
| ||||
| TC(mmol/L) | 3.78±0.91 | 3.87±1.58 | 3.64±1.74 | 0.404 |
| HDL-C(mmol/L) | 1.57±0.78 | 1.33±0.83 | 1.09±0.49 | <0.001 |
| LCL-C(mmol/L) | 2.14±0.77 | 2.55±1.22 | 2.59±1.00 | <0.001 |
| TG(mmol/L) | 1.17±0.70 | 2.05±1.30 | 3.60±1.90 | <0.001 |
| TG/HDL-C | 0.73±0.23 | 1.56±0.26 | 3.39±1.67 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Gensini score | 32.0 (12.5–65.0) | 28.0 (14.0–60.5) | 15.0 (32.8–64.4) | 0.814 |
|
| ||||
| Aspirin (%) | 73 | 69.7 | 79.5 | 0.214 |
| Statins (%) | 62.3 | 68.0 | 76.1 | 0.07 |
| β blockers (%) | 60.7 | 65.6 | 70.9 | 0.246 |
| Clopidogrel (%) | 32.8 | 36.1 | 41.0 | 0.413 |
| ACEI (%) | 14.8 | 18.0 | 16.2 | 0.786 |
| ARB (%) | 27.9 | 33.6 | 36.8 | 0.331 |
CAD, Coronary artery disease; ACE-I, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker. The ratio of TG/HDL-C is expressed with TG and HDL-C in millimoles per litre.
Fig 2Distribution of the TG/HDL-C ratio in the study population.
Fig 3Kaplan-Meier curves depicting freedom from all-cause mortality according to the TG/HDL-C tertile.
HRs for all-cause mortality according to TG/HDL-C ratio.
| TC/HDL ratio | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Middle | 1.44 (0.61–3.40) | 1.44(0.61–3.41) | 1.33(0.56–3.15) | 1.15(0.47–2.86) |
| Upper | 3.15(1.49–6.69) | 3.107(1.46–6.62) | 3.02(1.41–6.48) | 5.32(2.06–13.73) |
| P-value | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender. Model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, smoking. Model 3 was adjusted for age, gender, smoking, history of hypertension and history of diabetes. Model 4 was adjusted for age, gender, smoking, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, and CAD severity score.
Cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause death by TG/HDL-C.
| Predictor | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | p | |
| Log TG/HDL | 8.84(3.14–24.89) | 0.000 | 8.83(3.09–25.21) | 0.001 | 7.98(2.78–22.90) | 0.000 | 7.79(2.51–24.20) | 0.001 |
| Age(years) | 1.07(1.04–1.11) | 0.000 | 1.08(1.04–1.12) | 0.000 | 1.07(1.03–1.11) | 0.000 | 0.97(0.92–1.02) | 0.210 |
| Gender(male) | 1.03(0.53–2.00) | 0.942 | 0.60(0.27–1.35) | 0.128 | 0.92(0.40–2.10) | 0.837 | 0.79(0.40–1.59) | 0.511 |
| Smoking | 2.47(1.10–5.60) | 0.006 | 1.89(0.85–4.22) | 0.119 | 0.56(0.27–1.20) | 0.136 | ||
| Hypertension | 2.25(1.08–4.67) | 0.030 | 1.58(0.75–3.33) | 0.228 | ||||
| Diabetes | 1.99(1.06–3.77) | 0.034 | 1.06(0.57–1.96) | 0.864 | ||||
| Log Gensini | 2.79(0.92–8.37) | 0.069 | ||||||
Multivariable analysis of the association between TG/HDL-C ratio and MACEs.
| crude | Adjust | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95% CI) | P | OR(95% CI) | P | |
| Log TG/HDL | 2.36(1.02–5.49) | 0.046 | 2.94(1.22–7.09) | 0.016 |
Adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, smoking, diabetes by using the logistic regression model.