| Literature DB >> 31947534 |
Xiaotong Wen1, Lanyue Cui2, Fang Yuan3, Xiaojun Liu4, Mufeng Ouyang3, Yuxiao Sun3, Yuchen Liu3, Yong Liu1, Huiqiang Yu1, Huilie Zheng1, Yuanan Lu1,3, Zhaokang Yuan1.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to understand the utilization of inpatient services and its contributing factors among middle-aged and elderly females (MAEF) in less developed rural regions. Five surveys were conducted between 2006 and 2014 with rural residents of Jiangxi by stratified cluster random sampling. Participant females included only those who were aged 45 and above. Complex sampling logistics analysis was performed to analyze the effect of three factors on inpatient service. Complex sampling logistics regression analysis revealed that the probability of hospitalization for the divorced or widowed females was significantly lower than that of married ones (aOR = 0.177, p < 0.05). However, the probability of early discharge was significantly higher among divorced or widowed females than married ones (aOR = 3.237, p < 0.05). In addition, females with chronic diseases were more likely to be hospitalized (aOR = 3.682, p < 0.05). Also, early discharge (aOR = 7.689, p < 0.05) occurred among the participants who should be hospitalized but were not hospitalized occurred (aOR = 3.258, p < 0.05). The continuous improvement of the new rural cooperative medical policy has promoted the utilization of inpatient services for the MAEF. Findings from this study emphasize the need to strengthen the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases among middle-aged and elderly women.Entities:
Keywords: female; inpatient; less developed regions; middle-aged and elderly; rural
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947534 PMCID: PMC7013953 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The sampling process.
Figure 2The weighted process.
Financing level and compensation ratio of new rural cooperative medical care from 2006 to 2014.
| Variable | 2006 | 2008 | 2010 | 2012 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRMC annual fundraising level per person (¥) | 60 | 100 | 150 | 300 | 390 |
| Annual fee per person (¥) | 10 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 70 |
| Financial subsidy per person per year (¥) | 50 | 80 | 120 | 250 | 320 |
| Hospitalization reimbursement rates (%) | |||||
| Township (town) level designated hospital | 60 | 60 | 80 | 90 | 90 |
| County level designated hospital | 50 | 50 | 65 | 75 | 80 |
| County level above designated hospital | 40 | 40 | 45 | 60 | 50 |
| County level above non-fixed hospital outside the county | 30 | 30 | 35 | 50 | 35 |
NRMC: The new rural cooperative medical care.
Distribution of demographic characteristics of MAEF in three counties between 2006 and 2014 (%).
| Variable | 2006 | 2008 | 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample (N) | 1151 | 1220 | 1180 | 1301 | 1378 | 6230 |
| Weighted Number | 120,419 | 142,635 | 147,380 | 153,333 | 200,397 | 764,164 |
| Age (year) | ||||||
| 45~ | 47.8 | 46.7 | 48.5 | 47.5 | 43.0 | 46.4 |
| 55~ | 26.0 | 29.1 | 29.0 | 27.9 | 30.8 | 28.8 |
| 65~ | 16.4 | 15.7 | 15.1 | 16.7 | 16.6 | 16.1 |
| 75~ | 9.8 | 8.5 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Educational level | ||||||
| Illiterate | 23.9 | 16.5 | 14.7 | 10.7 | 21.5 | 17.4 |
| Elementary school | 56.2 | 54.3 | 53.4 | 56.8 | 53.5 | 54.7 |
| Middle school and above | 19.9 | 29.2 | 32.0 | 32.5 | 25.0 | 27.8 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married | 79.0 | 82.8 | 82.3 | 81.5 | 82.2 | 81.7 |
| Divorced/widowed | 21.0 | 17.2 | 17.7 | 18.5 | 17.8 | 18.3 |
| Occupation a | ||||||
| Non-farmer | 3.4 | 6.1 | 64.9 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 17.8 |
| Farmer | 96.6 | 93.9 | 35.1 | 94.6 | 94.6 | 82.2 |
| Labor force a | ||||||
| No | 42.0 | 53.8 | 30.9 | 27.1 | 33.6 | 36.9 |
| Yes | 58.0 | 46.2 | 69.1 | 72.9 | 66.4 | 63.1 |
| Chronic disease a | ||||||
| No | 80.0 | 77.5 | 69.9 | 80.5 | 74.3 | 76.2 |
| Yes | 20.0 | 22.5 | 30.1 | 19.5 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Income level (¥) | ||||||
| Low level | 1631.00 | 1303.18 | 2753.79 | 3415.98 | 3552.92 | 2606.76 |
| Middle low level | 2834.72 | 2526.63 | 4647.01 | 5874.59 | 8466.74 | 5189.30 |
| Middle level | 3878.76 | 3529.25 | 6130.16 | 7999.18 | 11,565.42 | 7120.34 |
| Middle high level | 5265.60 | 4745.82 | 7782.53 | 10,504.63 | 15,640.11 | 9697.77 |
| High income level | 10,115.62 | 8362.40 | 12,110.45 | 19,438.26 | 40,911.26 | 20,201.21 |
a chi-square statistic between different years p < 0.005.
Comparison of the difference of three indexes of inpatient service utilization after data weighted between different characteristic MAEF (%).
| Demographic Characteristics | The Rate of Hospitalization | The Rate of Early Discharge | The Rate of Hospital Avoidance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | |||
| 2006 | 6.7 | 23.7 | 30.3 |
| 2008 | 9.3 | 12.2 | 35.2 |
| 2010 | 6.4 | 11.7 | 24.0 |
| 2012 | 11.0 | 5.9 | 2.3 |
| 2014 | 14.2 | 8.6 | 13.2 |
|
| 0.003 | 0.023 | <0.001 |
| Age (year) | |||
| 45~ | 7.0 | 15.7 | 19.7 |
| 55~ | 12.1 | 11.1 | 20.9 |
| 65~ | 13.4 | 4.7 | 15.7 |
| 75~ | 12.6 | 5.6 | 19.0 |
|
| 0.022 | 0.099 | 0.714 |
| Educational level | |||
| Illiterate | 13.2 | 11.7 | 23.9 |
| Elementary school | 10.0 | 9.8 | 18.1 |
| Middle school and above | 7.9 | 11.7 | 16.8 |
|
| 0.018 | 0.870 | 0.378 |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 10.0 | 10.8 | 16.9 |
| Divorced/widowed | 9.7 | 9.7 | 28.2 |
|
| 0.837 | 0.754 | 0.008 |
| Occupation | |||
| Non-farmer | 5.3 | 4.0 | 15.5 |
| Farmer | 11.0 | 11.4 | 19.6 |
|
| 0.007 | 0.056 | 0.546 |
| Labor force | |||
| No | 14.7 | 8.4 | 22.8 |
| Yes | 7.2 | 13.3 | 14.6 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.175 | 0.185 |
| Chronic diseases | |||
| No | 6.4 | 7.2 | 6.3 |
| Yes | 21.2 | 14.1 | 29.1 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.125 | <0.001 |
| Income level | |||
| Low level | 10.7 | 10.8 | 25.3 |
| Middle low level | 11.0 | 10.0 | 16.0 |
| Middle level | 10.4 | 4.7 | 16.8 |
| Middle high level | 9.6 | 14.1 | 18.2 |
| High income level | 7.8 | 14.2 | 16.7 |
|
| 0.303 | 0.540 | 0.498 |
| Total | 10.0 | 10.6 | 19.2 |
a Pearson Chi-Square test.
Analysis three indexes of inpatient service utilization using complex sampling logistic regression among mid-aged and older females (%, 95% CI).
| Hospitalization | Early Discharge | Hospital Avoidance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cOR | aOR | cOR | aOR | cOR | aOR | |
| Year | (2006 as Ref.) | (2006 as Ref.) | (2006 as Ref.) | (2006 as Ref.) | (2006 as Ref.) | (2006 as Ref.) |
| 2008 | 1.432 (0.720, 2.849) | 1.312 (0.682, 2.524) | 0.447 (0.242, 0.826) * | 0.249 (0.083, 0.750) * | 1.246 (0.830, 1.870) | 1.156 (0.761, 1.757) |
| 2010 | 0.956 (0.530, 1.727) | 1.016 (0.565, 1.829) | 0.424 (0.130, 1.388) | 0.497 (0.142, 1.737) | 0.726 (0.408, 1.291) | 0.563 (0.250, 1.265) |
| 2012 | 1.729 (1.304, 2.293) * | 2.094 (1.509, 2.907) * | 0.202 (0.055, 0.739) * | 0.107 (0.054, 0.209) * | 0.054 (0.017, 0.172) * | 0.046 (0.013, 0.156) * |
| 2014 | 2.325 (1.307, 4.134) * | 2.384 (1.337, 4.252) * | 0.303 (0.109, 0.846) * | 0.177 (0.072, 0.437) * | 0.351 (0.194, 0.636) * | 0.347 (0.154, 0.782) * |
| Age | (45~ as Ref.) | (45~ as Ref.) | (45~ as Ref.) | (45~ as Ref.) | (45~ as Ref.) | (45~ as Ref.) |
| 55~ | 1.832 (1.132, 2.965) * | 1.387 (0.748, 2.572) | 0.672 (0.359, 1.257) | 0.611 (0.321, 1.162) | 1.073 (0.628, 1.834) | 0.694 (0.396, 1.217) |
| 65~ | 2.059 (1.456, 2.911) * | 1.406 (0.983, 2.012) | 0.264 (0.062, 1.121) | 0.174 (0.024, 1.253) | 0.760 (0.334, 1.730) | 0.339 (0.154, 0.745) |
| 75~ | 1.920 (0.959, 3.844) | 1.456 (0.634, 3.342) | 0.318 (0.100, 1.014) | 0.322 (0.084, 1.240) | 0.955 (0.413, 2.208) | 0.455 (0.185, 1.123) |
| Educational level | (Illiterate as Ref.) | (Illiterate as Ref.) | (Illiterate as Ref.) | (Illiterate as Ref.) | (Illiterate as Ref.) | (Illiterate as Ref.) |
| ES | 0.732 (0.546, 0.981) * | 0.900 (0.687, 1.178) | 0.817 (0.309, 2.162) | 0.784 (0.292, 2.110) | 0.704 (0.381, 1.302) | 1.153 (0.504, 2.636) |
| MSA | 0.569 (0.360, 0.898) * | 0.784 (0.495, 1.241) | 1.001 (0.267, 3.747) | 0.566 (0.131, 2.444) | 0.643 (0.300, 1.379) | 0.609 (0.238, 1.558) |
| Marital status | (Married as Ref.) | (Married as Ref.) | (Married as Ref.) | (Married as Ref.) | (Married as Ref.) | (Married as Ref.) |
| Divorced/widowed | 0.968 (0.689, 1.359) | 0.569 (0.399, 0.811) * | 0.885 (0.385, 2.033) | 1.963 (0.708, 5.446) | 1.926 (1.222, 3.036) * | 3.237 (1.397, 7.500) * |
| Occupation | (Non-farmer as Ref.) | (Non-farmer as Ref.) | (Non-farmer as Ref.) | (Non-farmer as Ref.) | (Non-farmer as Ref.) | (Non-farmer as Ref.) |
| Farmer | 2.181 (1.271, 3.743) * | 1.356 (0.909, 2.023) | 3.086 (0.909, 10.476) | 7.750 (0.985, 60.993) | 1.333 (0.485, 3.665) | 1.683 (0.523, 5.418) |
| Labor force | (Yes as Ref.) | (Yes as Ref.) | (Yes as Ref.) | (Yes as Ref.) | (Yes as Ref.) | (Yes as Ref.) |
| No | 2.208 (1.527, 3.192) * | 1.976 (1.373, 2.846) * | 1.676 (0.763, 3.680) | 0.471 (0.187, 1.188) | 1.729 (0.736, 4.061) | 1.140 (0.442, 2.943) |
| Chronic disease | (No as Ref.) | (No as Ref.) | (No as Ref.) | (No as Ref.) | (No as Ref.) | (No as Ref.) |
| Yes | 3.913 (3.095, 4.948) * | 3.682 (2.941, 4.610) * | 2.113 (0.773, 5.775) | 3.258 (1.142, 9.299) * | 6.065 (2.743, 13.408) * | 7.689 (3.113, 18.987) * |
| Income level | (Low income as Ref.) | (Low income as Ref.) | (Low income as Ref.) | (Low income as Ref.) | (Low income as Ref.) | (Low income as Ref.) |
| Low | 1.032 (0.753, 1.415) | 1.080 (0.825, 1.415) | 0.917 (0.198, 4.242) | 1.123 (0.225, 5.607) | 0.563 (0.250, 1.267) | 0.690 (0.280, 1.700) |
| Middle | 0.975 (0.627, 1.515) | 1.108 (0.735, 1.671) | 0.408 (0.113, 1.475) | 0.437 (0.093, 2.050) | 0.596 (0.294, 1.206) | 0.616 (0.212, 1.788) |
| Middle high | 0.891 (0.728, 1.091) | 1.078 (0.821, 1.415) | 1.359 (0.512, 3.606) | 1.846 (0.652, 5.223) | 0.655 (0.210, 2.043) | 0.879 (0.253, 3.054) |
| High | 0.713 (0.538, 0.946) * | 0.976 (0.729, 1.307) | 1.371 (0.384, 4.886) | 1.186 (0.413, 3.408) | 0.591 (0.247, 1.415) | 0.557 (0.194, 1.595) |
* p < 0.05.
The variable assignment summary for complex sampling logistic regression analysis.
| Factors | Variable Name | Factor Assignment |
|---|---|---|
| Dependent variables | ||
| Hospitalization | Y1 | 1 = Yes,0 = No (reference) |
| Hospital avoidance | Y2 | 1 = Yes,0 = No (reference) |
| Early discharge | Y3 | 1 = Yes,0 = No (reference) |
| Independent variables | ||
| Year | X1, X2, X3, X4 | 2006 (reference): X1 = 0, X2 = 0, X3 = 0, X4 = 0 |
| 2008: X1 = 1, X2 = 0, X3 = 0, X4 = 0 | ||
| 2010: X1 = 0, X2 = 1, X3 = 0, X4 = 0 | ||
| 2012: X1 = 0, X2 = 0, X3 = 1, X4 = 0 | ||
| 2014: X1 = 0, X2 = 0, X3 = 0, X4 = 1 | ||
| Age (year) | X5, X6, X7 | 45~(reference): X5 = 0, X6 = 0, X7 = 0 |
| 55~: X5 = 1, X6 = 0, X7 = 0 | ||
| 65~: X5 = 0, X6 = 1, X7 = 0 | ||
| 75~: X5 = 0, X6 = 0, X7 = 1 | ||
| Educational level | X8, X9 | Illiterate (reference): X8 = 0, X9 = 0 |
| Elementary school: X8 = 1, X9 = 0 | ||
| Middle school and above: X8 = 0, X9 = 1 | ||
| Marital status | X10 | 0 = Married (reference); 1 = divorced/widowed |
| Occupation | X11 | 0 = Non-farmer (reference); 1 = Farmer |
| Labor force | X12 | 0 = Yes (reference); 1 = No |
| Chronic diseases | X13 | 0 = No (reference); 1 = Yes |
| Income level | X14, X15, X16, X17 | Low level income (reference): X14 = 0, X15 = 0, X16 = 0, X17 = 0 |
| Low middle level income: X14 = 1, X15 = 0, X16 = 0, X17 = 0 | ||
| Middle level income: X14 = 0, X15 = 1, X16 = 0, X17 = 0 | ||
| Upper middle level income: X14 = 0, X15 = 0, X16 = 1, X17 = 0 | ||
| High level income: X14 = 0, X15 = 0, X16 = 0, X17 = 1 | ||