Literature DB >> 31942698

Use of Patient Preference Studies in HTA Decision Making: A NICE Perspective.

Jacoline C Bouvy1, Luke Cowie2, Rosemary Lovett3, Deborah Morrison4, Heidi Livingstone5, Nick Crabb3,4.   

Abstract

Patient preference studies could provide valuable insights to a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence committee into the preferences patients have for different treatment options, especially if the study sample is representative of the broader patient population. We identify three main uses of patient preference studies along a technology's pathway from drug development to clinical use: in early clinical development to guide the selection of appropriate endpoints, to inform benefit-risk assessments carried out by regulators and to inform reimbursement decisions made by health technology assessment bodies. In the context of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's methods and processes, we do not see a role for quantitative patient preference data to be directly incorporated into health economic modelling. Rather, we see a role for patient preference studies to be submitted alongside other types of evidence. Examples where patient preference studies might have added value in health technology assessments include cases where two distinctly different treatment options are being compared, when patients have to decide between multiple treatment options, when technologies have important non-health benefits or when a treatment is indicated for a heterogenous population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31942698     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00408-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  6 in total

1.  Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?

Authors:  David John Mott
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Incorporating patient preferences into drug development and regulatory decision making: Results from a quantitative pilot study with cancer patients, carers, and regulators.

Authors:  D Postmus; M Mavris; H L Hillege; T Salmonson; B Ryll; A Plate; I Moulon; H-G Eichler; N Bere; F Pignatti
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making.

Authors:  Martin P Ho; Juan Marcos Gonzalez; Herbert P Lerner; Carolyn Y Neuland; Joyce M Whang; Michelle McMurry-Heath; A Brett Hauber; Telba Irony
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Patient Preferences in Regulatory Benefit-Risk Assessments: A US Perspective.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Mo Zhou
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016 Sep - Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 5.  Patient-centered clinical trials.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Martin P Ho; Telba Irony; Murray Sheldon; Andrew W Lo
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 7.851

6.  A Framework for Incorporating Patient Preferences Regarding Benefits and Risks into Regulatory Assessment of Medical Technologies.

Authors:  Martin Ho; Anindita Saha; K Kimberly McCleary; Bennett Levitan; Stephanie Christopher; Kristen Zandlo; R Scott Braithwaite; A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016 Sep - Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

  6 in total
  20 in total

1.  Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Norah L Crossnohere; Sarah Janse; Ellen Janssen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Do preferences differ based on respondent experience of a health issue and its treatment? A case study using a public health intervention.

Authors:  David J Mott; Laura Ternent; Luke Vale
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-06-18

3.  Investigating patients' preferences for new anti-diabetic drugs to inform public health insurance coverage decisions: a discrete choice experiment in China.

Authors:  Jinsong Geng; Haini Bao; Zhe Feng; Jingyi Meng; Xiaolan Yu; Hao Yu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  People living with moderate-to-severe COPD prefer improvement of daily symptoms over the improvement of exacerbations: a multicountry patient preference study.

Authors:  Nigel S Cook; Gerard J Criner; Pierre-Régis Burgel; Katie Mycock; Tom Gardner; Phil Mellor; Pam Hallworth; Kate Sully; Sophi Tatlock; Beyza Klein; Byron Jones; Olivier Le Rouzic; Kip Adams; Kirsten Phillips; Mike McKevitt; Kazuko Toyama; Florian S Gutzwiller
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.

Authors:  Hannah Collacott; Vikas Soekhai; Caitlin Thomas; Anne Brooks; Ella Brookes; Rachel Lo; Sarah Mulnick; Sebastian Heidenreich
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study Protocol Among Advanced Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ilaria Durosini; Rosanne Janssens; Reinhard Arnou; Jorien Veldwijk; Meredith Y Smith; Dario Monzani; Ian Smith; Giulia Galli; Marina Garassino; Eva G Katz; Luca Bailo; Evelyne Louis; Marie Vandevelde; Kristiaan Nackaerts; G Ardine de Wit; Gabriella Pravettoni; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-02-05

7.  Patient Preferences for Multiple Myeloma Treatments: A Multinational Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Rosanne Janssens; Tamika Lang; Ana Vallejo; Jayne Galinsky; Ananda Plate; Kate Morgan; Elena Cabezudo; Raija Silvennoinen; Daniel Coriu; Sorina Badelita; Ruxandra Irimia; Minna Anttonen; Riikka-Leena Manninen; Elise Schoefs; Martina Vandebroek; Anneleen Vanhellemont; Michel Delforge; Hilde Stevens; Steven Simoens; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-06

8.  Use of Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment: Perspectives of Canadian, Belgian and German HTA Representatives.

Authors:  Eline van Overbeeke; Valérie Forrester; Steven Simoens; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Stakeholder-Engaged Derivation of Patient-Informed Value Elements.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Beverly Butler; Juan Caicedo; Annie Kennedy; Yoon Duk Hong; Chengchen Zhang; Julia F Slejko
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  The Importance of Collaboration in Pursuit of Patient-Centered Value Assessment.

Authors:  Mark T Linthicum; Susan dosReis; Julia F Slejko; T Joseph Mattingly; Jennifer L Bright
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.