Literature DB >> 31940651

Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery: Remodelling of Outer Retinal Layers after Traditional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique.

Ferdinando Bottoni1, Salvatore Parrulli2, Maurizio Mete3, Isabella D'Agostino2, Matteo Cereda2, Mario Cigada2, Emilia Maggio3, Giorgia Maraone3, Daniela Iacovello3, Elisa Bottega3, Giovanni Staurenghi2, Grazia Pertile3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of the inverted flap technique compared with traditional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the postoperative remodelling of outer retinal layers of idiopathic macular holes (MHs) >450 µm.
METHODS: We analyzed medical records and imaging studies of all patients with an idiopathic MH >450 µm who underwent vitrectomy at the Sacco University Hospital, Milan, and the Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy, between January 2008 and December 2017. Out of 41 eyes evaluated, 17 were treated with traditional ILM peeling and 24 with the inverted ILM flap technique. All patients underwent follow-up examinations every 3 months and all of them completed a final visit 12 months after surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters were evaluated at each visit. The main outcome measures were the postoperative recovery rate of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ), and postoperative BCVA. Correlations between OCT measurements and visual outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: The ELM recovery rate in the ILM peeling group (15/17 eyes, 88%) was higher than in the ILM flap group (14/24 eyes, 58%) (p = 0.079). The EZ recovery rate was similar in the 2 groups, 7/17 eyes (41%) in the ILM peeling and 8/24 eyes (33%) in the ILM flap group (p = 0.744). Eyes without a persistent hyper-reflective "plug" at the edges of the MH showed a significantly higher EZ recovery rate (11/18, 61%) compared with eyes showing a persistent plug (4/23, 17%) (p = 0.008). The mean BCVA improved significantly in both groups: from 0.93 logMAR (20/170) to 0.26 logMAR (20/36) in the ILM peeling and from 0.98 logMAR (20/190) to 0.37 logMAR (20/46) in the ILM flap group. The final BCVA tended to be better in the ILM peeling group (p = 0.085).
CONCLUSIONS: Given the limited information about the influence of ILM flap versus traditional ILM peeling in the postoperative remodelling of large idiopathic MHs, our data provides some new insights into the healing process of MHs >450 µm. This should be considered as part of the decision process about whether to perform an ILM flap in these patients.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverted flap technique; Large idiopathic macular hole; Traditional internal limiting membrane peeling

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31940651     DOI: 10.1159/000505926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  6 in total

1.  Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Eyes with Idiopathic Macular Holes that Underwent Surgery Using the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) Flap Technique Versus the Conventional ILM Peeling Technique.

Authors:  Yujie Yan; Tong Zhao; Chuan Sun; Haipeng Zhao; Xingwu Jia; Zhijun Wang
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Secondary Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Plug due to Persistent Full-Thickness Macular Hole OCT-Angiography and Microperimetry Features: Case Series.

Authors:  Dominika Wrzesińska; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Dominika Nowakowska; Mario Damiano Toro; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Michele Reibaldi; Teresio Avitabile; Robert Rejdak
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Comparative study of combined vitrectomy with phacoemulsification versus vitrectomy alone for primary full-thickness macular hole repair.

Authors:  Christophe Valmaggia; Filip Kostadinov; Corina Lang; Josef Guber
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  [Large macular hole-Always a poor prognosis?]

Authors:  J Friedrich; N Bleidißel; J Klaas; N Feucht; A Nasseri; C P Lohmann; M Maier
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Visual improvement and regeneration of retinal layers in eyes with small, medium, and large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes treated with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique over a period of 12 months.

Authors:  Nathalie Bleidißel; Julia Friedrich; Nikolaus Feucht; Julian Klaas; Mathias Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 6.  [Management of submacular hemorrhage : What, when, how?]

Authors:  Lars-Olof Hattenbach; Salvatore Grisanti; Nicolas Feltgen; Argyrios Chronopoulos
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.059

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.