Literature DB >> 33689136

Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Eyes with Idiopathic Macular Holes that Underwent Surgery Using the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) Flap Technique Versus the Conventional ILM Peeling Technique.

Yujie Yan1, Tong Zhao1, Chuan Sun1, Haipeng Zhao1, Xingwu Jia1, Zhijun Wang2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique (IFT) in macular holes (MHs), especially in MHs with a macular hole index (MHI) < 0.5.
METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. Patients with idiopathic MHs who underwent either the IFT or conventional ILM peeling (CP) were investigated. The main outcomes included the MH closure rate, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and recovery rates of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients who underwent the IFT (n = 29, Group A) or CP (n = 19, Group B) were included. The mean minimal diameter was 522.00 ± 208.08 µm. The closure rate was 100.0% in Group A and 94.7% in Group B (P = 0.396). The mean BCVA and EZ and ELM recovery rates improved significantly in both groups postoperatively. No significant differences in BCVA or the EZ or ELM recovery rates were found between the two groups. Of the 39 eyes whose MHI was < 0.5, 25 underwent the IFT, and 14 underwent CP. Comparing the results of the closure rate, BCVA and recovery rates of the EZ and ELM between groups were similar to those in 48 eyes.
CONCLUSION: Both the IFT and CP can achieve a high closure rate, with no significant difference in ordinary idiopathic MHs. The IFT does not seem to achieve better anatomical and functional outcomes than CP. The IFT should be used conservatively in ordinary non-refractory MH surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional ILM peeling; Idiopathic macular hole; Inverted ILM flap technique; Macular hole index

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33689136     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01682-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery in patients with high myopia vs. non-high myopia: a case-control study using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tsung-Tien Wu; Ya-Hsin Kung
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole.

Authors:  Jay S Duker; Peter K Kaiser; Susanne Binder; Marc D de Smet; Alain Gaudric; Elias Reichel; SriniVas R Sadda; Jerry Sebag; Richard F Spaide; Peter Stalmans
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  Best surgical technique and outcomes for large macular holes: retrospective multicentre study in Japan.

Authors:  Toshifumi Yamashita; Taiji Sakamoto; Hiroto Terasaki; Masanori Iwasaki; Yoko Ogushi; Fumiki Okamoto; Masaru Takeuchi; Tsutomu Yasukawa; Yoshihiro Takamura; Nahoko Ogata; Yumiko Nakamura
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes.

Authors:  Zofia Michalewska; Janusz Michalewski; Ron A Adelman; Jerzy Nawrocki
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LARGE SERIES OF PATIENTS.

Authors:  Stanislao Rizzo; Ruggero Tartaro; Francesco Barca; Tomaso Caporossi; Daniela Bacherini; Fabrizio Giansanti
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR VERY LARGE MACULAR HOLES.

Authors:  Raja Narayanan; Sumit R Singh; Stanford Taylor; Maria H Berrocal; Jay Chhablani; Mudit Tyagi; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; Rajeev R Pappuru; Rajendra S Apte
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Macular hole surgery with internal-limiting membrane peeling and intravitreous air.

Authors:  D W Park; J O Sipperley; S R Sneed; P U Dugel; J Jacobsen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study.

Authors:  N E Kelly; R T Wendel
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-05

9.  Inverted ILM peeling for idiopathic and other etiology macular holes.

Authors:  Mahesh P Shanmugam; Rajesh Ramanjulu; Madhu Kumar; Gladys Rodrigues; Srinivasulu Reddy; Divyansh Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Surgical outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular hole.

Authors:  Prabhushanker Mahalingam; Kumar Sambhav
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.