| Literature DB >> 31936576 |
Savvas Titsinides1, Theodore Karatzas2, Despoina Perrea2, Efstathios Eleftheriadis3, Leonidas Podaropoulos3, Demos Kalyvas3, Christos Katopodis4, George Agrogiannis5.
Abstract
Regeneration of large jaw bone defects still remains a clinical challenge. To avoid incomplete bone repair, bone grafts have been advocated to support the healing process. This study comparatively evaluated new bone formation among a synthetic graft substitute, a human bone derivative, and a bovine xenograft. Materials were placed in 3 out of the 4 bone cavities, while 1 deficit was left empty, serving as a control, in mono-cortical defects, surgically prepared in the porcine calvaria bone. Animals were randomized in 2 groups and euthanized at 8 and 12 weeks. Harvested tissue specimens were qualitatively evaluated by histology. New bone formation was quantitatively measured by histomorphometry. Maximum new bone formation was noticed in defects grafted with beta-tricalcium phosphate b-TCP compared to the other bone substitutes, at 8 and 12 weeks post-surgery. Bovine and human allograft induced less new bone formation compared to empty bone cavity. Histologic analysis revealed that b-TCP was absorbed and substituted significantly, while bovine and human allograft was maintained almost intact in close proximity with new bone. Based on our findings, higher new bone formation was detected in defects filled with b-TCP when compared to bovine and human graft substitutes.Entities:
Keywords: alveolar bone grafting; bone regeneration; bone replacement material; bone substitutes
Year: 2020 PMID: 31936576 PMCID: PMC7175133 DOI: 10.3390/dj8010007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dent J (Basel) ISSN: 2304-6767
Figure 1(A) Surgical exposure of the calvaria bone after elevation of a full thickness flap, (B) Intra-operative view of the surgically prepared bone defects, (C) The cylindrical bone segments were gradually mobilized and detached using a thin chisel, (D) Bone defects filled with graft substitutes while one was left empty.
Grafting materials applied in our study and their characteristics.
| Graft | Characteristics | Granule Size (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Bio-Oss | Bovine, deproteinized bone mineral | 1–2 |
| Calc-i-oss | Synthetic, phase-pure beta-tricalcium phosphate | 1–1.6 |
| Demokritos | Human, freeze-dried, mineralized, and lyophilized cancellous bone allograft | 1–2 |
Figure 2(A) Gross view of the bone defects after sacrifice of animals. All sites were filled with new bone, (B) Frontal sections of the calvaria bone during processing, (C,D) Frontal sections in magnification. Notice the remnants of the grafts while in the empty cavity soft tissue can be identified.
Figure 3Representative histological pictures at 8 and 12 weeks of bone healing (H&E staining) (original magnification ×40). Residual granules of the grafting materials are still apparent, (A,B) Bovine graft, (C,D) Synthetic graft, (E,F) Human graft, (G,H) Empty bone cavity gradually forming new bone intermixed with connective tissue. Abbreviations: NB: new bone, Gr: grafting material, CT: connective tissue.
Results of histomorphometric analysis regarding total volumes (%) of newly formed bone in the empty, synthetic, bovine, and human grafted sites (mean). Measurements were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Control | 34.81 | 7.98 | 44.80 | 0.60 |
| Synthetic | 34.11 | 20.21 | 47.25 | 1.12 |
| Bovine | 32.08 | 11.95 | 39.14 | 1.10 |
| Human | 29.20 | 9.55 | 35.08 | 0.93 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
| Control | 0.858 | 0.005 | ||
| Control | 0.179 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 0.541 | 0.001 | ||
| Synthetic | 0.693 | 0.002 | ||
| Synthetic | 0.315 | 0.001 | ||
| Bovine | 0.583 | 0.001 | ||