Literature DB >> 19288885

Bone regeneration using beta-tricalcium phosphate in a calcium sulfate matrix.

Leonidas Podaropoulos1, Alexander A Veis, Serafim Papadimitriou, Constantinos Alexandridis, Demos Kalyvas.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was the histomorphometric comparison of the osteogenic potential of beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) alone or in a calcium sulfate matrix. Three round defects, 10 mm (diameter) x 5 mm (depth), were created on each iliac crest of 4 dogs. The defects were divided into 3 groups. Ten defects were filled with beta-TCP in a calcium sulfate (CS) matrix (Fortoss Vital; group A), 10 defects were filled with beta-TCP alone (Fortoss Resorb; group B), and 4 defects were left ungrafted to heal spontaneously (group C). All defects were left to heal for 4 months without the use of a barrier membrane. Histologic evaluation and morphometric analysis of undecalcified slides was performed using the areas of regenerated bone and graft remnants. All sites exhibited uneventful healing. In group A sites (beta-TCP/CS), complete bone formation was observed in all specimens, graft granules dominated the area, and a thin bridge of cortical bone was covering the defect. Group B (beta-TCP) defects were partially filled with new bone, the graft particles still dominated the area, while the outer cortex was not restored. In the ungrafted sites (group C), incomplete new bone formation was observed. The outer dense cortical layer was restored in a lower level, near the base of the defect. The statistical analysis revealed that the mean percentage of new bone regeneration in group A was higher than in group B (49.38% and 40.31%, respectively). A statistically significant difference existed between the 2 groups. The beta-TCP/CS group exhibited significantly higher new bone regeneration according to a marginal probability value (P = .004 < .05). The use of beta-TCP in a CS matrix produced significantly more vital new bone fill and preserved bone dimensions compared with the use of beta-TCP alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19288885     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.1.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  10 in total

1.  Chronology of the radiographic appearances of the calcium sulphate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite following resection of bone tumours--a preliminary study of the normal post-operative appearances.

Authors:  Nikhil A Kotnis; Naveen Parasu; Karen Finlay; Erik Jurriaans; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Synergistic anti-inflammatory and osteogenic n-HA/resveratrol/chitosan composite microspheres for osteoporotic bone regeneration.

Authors:  Limei Li; Mali Yu; Yao Li; Qing Li; Hongcai Yang; Meng Zheng; Yi Han; Di Lu; Sheng Lu; Li Gui
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-11-08

3.  Protocol for Bone Augmentation with Simultaneous Early Implant Placement: A Retrospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  Peter Fairbairn; Minas Leventis
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-11-24

4.  Characterisation of a novel poly (ether ether ketone)/calcium sulphate composite for bone augmentation.

Authors:  Erik A B Hughes; Liam M Grover
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2017-05-19

5.  Osseous Healing in Surgically Prepared Bone Defects Using Different Grafting Materials: An Experimental Study in Pigs.

Authors:  Savvas Titsinides; Theodore Karatzas; Despoina Perrea; Efstathios Eleftheriadis; Leonidas Podaropoulos; Demos Kalyvas; Christos Katopodis; George Agrogiannis
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-09

6.  Multiple channels with interconnected pores in a bioceramic scaffold promote bone tissue formation.

Authors:  Xuesong Wang; Ziyan Nie; Jia Chang; Michael L Lu; Yunqing Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Role of magnesium-doped calcium sulfate and β-tricalcium phosphate composite ceramics in macrophage polarization and osteo-induction.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Su Sun; Yan He; Tingting Yan; Jianfeng Sun; Jie Pan; Shuyu Zhu; Liqiong Chen; Pengfei Zhu; Biao Xu; Yan Liu
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.885

8.  Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Novel Synthetic Grafting Material: A Case with Two-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Peter Fairbairn; Minas Leventis; Chas Mangham; Robert Horowitz
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 9.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management.

Authors:  Gabriel Fernandez de Grado; Laetitia Keller; Ysia Idoux-Gillet; Quentin Wagner; Anne-Marie Musset; Nadia Benkirane-Jessel; Fabien Bornert; Damien Offner
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.813

10.  Bone Healing in Rabbit Calvaria Defects Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute: A Histological and Micro-CT Comparative Study.

Authors:  Minas Leventis; Peter Fairbairn; Chas Mangham; Antonios Galanos; Orestis Vasiliadis; Danai Papavasileiou; Robert Horowitz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.