Literature DB >> 16831666

The monocortical critical size bone defect as an alternative experimental model in testing bone substitute materials.

Karl Andreas Schlegel1, Friedemann Johannes Lang, Karl Donath, Jochen Theodor Kulow, Jörg Wiltfang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reproducibility and comparability are prerequisites in testing bone substitute materials in an animal study. Various animal test models are used. The standard in testing bone substitute materials is the so-called critical size defect (CSD) model described by Schmitz and Hollinger. In most studies a bicortical (full thickness defect) CSD is used.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, monocortical defects (10 x 10 mm) in calvarias of adult pigs were created and compared to examine the spontaneous physiologic healing process and the required criteria for a CSD. STUDY
DESIGN: Regeneration of defects, either filled using autogenous bone (group 1) or unfilled (group 2), was evaluated by means of microradiography and light microscopy after 2, 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks.
RESULTS: No complete osseous regeneration was found microradiographically and light microscopically in the control group at week 52 (nonmineralized area: 30% +/- 1.7%; mineralized area: 55% +/- 1.7%; bone marrow area: 15% +/- 1.7%). Defects treated with autogenous bone showed a 100% osseous defect filling after 26 weeks.
CONCLUSION: The monocortical CSD fulfills the requirements for a CSD and represents a procedure which can be handled simply for investigations focusing on bone regeneration and testing of bone substitute materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16831666     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  15 in total

Review 1.  Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-21

2.  The effect of polyethylenglycol gel on the delivery and osteogenic differentiation of homologous tooth germ-derived stem cells in a porcine model.

Authors:  Mustafa Ramazanoglu; Tobias Moest; Pınar Ercal; Zacharias Polyviou; Katharina Herrmann; Gorke Gurel Pekozer; Aart Molenberg; Rainer Lutz; Gamze Torun Kose; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Dental pulp-derived stromal cells exhibit a higher osteogenic potency than bone marrow-derived stromal cells in vitro and in a porcine critical-size bone defect model.

Authors:  Jonas Jensen; Claus Tvedesøe; Jan Hendrik Duedal Rölfing; Casper Bindzus Foldager; Helle Lysdahl; David Christian Evar Kraft; Muwan Chen; Jorgen Baas; Dang Quang Svend Le; Cody Eric Bünger
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-04-20

4.  Morphological Observation on Critical-Sized Cranial Defect Repaired by Icariin and Autologous Concentrate Growth Factors in Rabbits.

Authors:  Gang Li; Jie Wang; Guiyun Ren; Fuliang Hao; Yanning Zhang; Peikai Shi; Xiao Liu; Fusheng Dong
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-05-19

5.  Bone regeneration in surgically created defects filled with autogenous bone: an epifluorescence microscopy analysis in rats.

Authors:  Marcos Heidy Guskuma; Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira; Flávia Priscila Pereira; Idelmo Rangel-Garcia Junior; Roberta Okamoto; Tetuo Okamoto; Osvaldo Magro Filho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Exploring the Mechanism of Total Flavonoids of Drynariae Rhizoma to Improve Large Bone Defects by Network Pharmacology and Experimental Assessment.

Authors:  Weipeng Sun; Minying Li; Lei Xie; Zhexing Mai; Yan Zhang; Lieliang Luo; Zijian Yan; Zige Li; Hang Dong; Feng Huang; Zhen Shen; Ziwei Jiang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Animal models of vertical bone augmentation (Review).

Authors:  Zepeng Zhang; Yaxin Gan; Yarong Guo; Xuguang Lu; Xianqi Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Injectable biocomposites for bone healing in rabbit femoral condyle defects.

Authors:  Jianheng Liu; Kezheng Mao; Zhengsheng Liu; Xiumei Wang; Fuzhai Cui; Wenguang Guo; Keya Mao; Shuying Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials.

Authors:  Ye Li; Shu-Kui Chen; Long Li; Ling Qin; Xin-Luan Wang; Yu-Xiao Lai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Morphometric evaluation of bone regeneration in segmental mandibular bone defects filled with bovine bone xenografts in a split-mouth rabbit model.

Authors:  Mariana Quirino Silveira Soares; Jeroen Van Dessel; Reinhilde Jacobs; Renato Yassutaka Faria Yaedú; Eduardo Sant'Ana; Danilo da Silva Corrêa; Maria Fernanda Conceição Madeira; Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.