| Literature DB >> 31936528 |
Nadezhda Golubkina1, Zarema Amagova2, Visita Matsadze2, Svetlana Zamana3, Alessio Tallarita4, Gianluca Caruso4.
Abstract
Biofortification of garlic and onion plants with selenium and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation are considered beneficial for producing functional food with anticarcinogenic properties. The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation, sodium selenate foliar application, and the combination AMF + selenium (Se), compared to an untreated control, were assessed regarding the bulb yield, biochemical characteristics, and mineral composition. AMF + Se application resulted in the highest yield, monosaccharides, and Se content in both garlic and onion bulbs; and an increase of ascorbic acid and flavonoids in onion, and flavonoids in garlic. The highest bulb concentrations of P and K were recorded under the AMF + Se application, Ca was best affected by AMF, and Mg accumulation was highest under all the treatments in garlic and upon AMF + Se application in onion bulbs. Contrary to garlic, onion bulbs were characterized by a remarkable increase in microelements (B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Si, Zn) under the AMF + Se treatment. Selenium, either with or without AMF application, promoted the accumulation of B and Si in onion and Mo and Zn in garlic bulbs. It can be inferred that the interaction between AMF and Se is highly specific, differing for garlic and onion grown in similar environmental conditions in Grozny region, Chechen Republic.Entities:
Keywords: Allium cepa L.; Allium sativum L.; antioxidants; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; mineral content; selenium
Year: 2020 PMID: 31936528 PMCID: PMC7020493 DOI: 10.3390/plants9010084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and selenium application on root mycorrhizal colonization, yield, mean bulb weight, and dry matter in garlic and onion.
| Species | Treatment | Root Mycorrhizal Colonization (%) | Yield (t·ha−1) | Mean Bulb Weight (g) | Dry Matter (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garlic | Control | 21.3 ± 2.2 b | 11.5 ± 1.3 c | 18.4 ± 2.1 c | 34.8 ± 0.1 c |
| AMF | 65.7 ± 3.0 a | 16.1 ± 1.9 b | 25.8 ± 4.3 b | 37.6 ± 0.2 a | |
| Se | 21.5 ± 2.0 b | 11.8 ± 1.8 c | 18.9 ± 3.7 c | 38.0 ± 0.1 a | |
| AMF + Se | 66.4 ± 2.8 a | 17.9 ± 2.2 a | 28.7 ± 4.7 a | 36.1 ± 0.3 b | |
| Onion | Control | 21.1 ± 2.3 b | 22.7 ± 3.0 b | 45.3 ± 7.8 b | 14.3 ± 0.2 b |
| AMF | 68.6 ± 2.7 a | 33.0 ± 3.5 a | 65.9 ± 7.2 a | 17.0 ± 0.4 a | |
| Se | 21.7 ± 2.2 b | 22.8 ± 2.9 b | 45.5 ± 7.6 b | 15.0 ± 0.4 b | |
| AMF + Se | 69.2 ± 3.1 a | 34.1 ± 3.5 a | 68.1 ± 7.0 a | 16.3 ± 0.1 a |
Within each column and species, values followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of AMF and selenium application on carbohydrates, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity in garlic and onion bulbs.
| Species | Treatment | Monosaccharides (% d.w.) | Total Sugars (% d.w.) | Titratable Acidity (mg-eq Citric Acid 100 g−1 d.w.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garlic | Control | 15.7 ± 1.1 c | 50.9 ± 3.1 c | 4.9 ± 0.2 b |
| AMF | 17.0 ± 1.2 c | 60.9 ± 3.6 ab | 4.3 ± 0.2 c | |
| Se | 20.3 ± 1.3 b | 59.8 ± 3.2 b | 4.5 ± 0.2 bc | |
| AMF + Se | 27.5 ± 1.6 a | 62.0 ± 3.7 a | 5.8 ± 0.3 a | |
| Onion | Control | 3.4 ± 0.3 c | 61.8 ± 2.8 c | 13.4 ± 1.0 b |
| AMF | 5.7 ± 0.5 ab | 68.9 ± 3.1 a | 19.4 ± 1.2 a | |
| Se | 4.8 ± 0.4 b | 63.7 ± 3.5 bc | 17.6 ± 1.2 a | |
| AMF + Se | 6.8 ± 0.5 a | 65.2 ± 3.7 b | 14.9 ± 1.1 b |
Within each column and species, values followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Changes in monosaccharides content in garlic and onion bulbs, compared to control, as affected by AMF and sodium selenate.
Antioxidant compounds and activity in garlic and onion bulbs as affected by AMF and selenium application.
| Species | Treatment | AOA (mg-eq GA g−1 d.w.) | Phenolics (mg-eq GA g−1 d.w.) | Flavonoids (mg-eq Q 100 g−1 d.w.) | Ascorbic Acid (mg 100 g−1 d.w.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garlic | Control | 39.0 ± 1.1 b | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 59.8 ± 1.7 b |
| AMF | 38.8 ± 1.0 b | 4.4 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 61.4 ± 1.8 b | |
| Se | 40.5 ± 1.1 ab | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 62.9 ± 1.8 ab | |
| AMF + Se | 42.2 ± 1.1 a | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 66.0 ± 2.1 a | |
| n.s. | n.s. | ||||
| Onion | Control | 31.7 ± 0.7 c | 11.5 ± 0.5 b | 3.2 ± 0.1 b | 59.4 ± 1.4 c |
| AMF | 36.4 ± 0.9 b | 15.2 ± 0.6 a | 3.4 ± 0.1 b | 58.0 ± 1.3 c | |
| Se | 33.0 ± 0.7 c | 14.9 ± 0.6 a | 3.2 ± 0.1 b | 66.7 ± 1.5 b | |
| AMF + Se | 43.4 ± 0.6 a | 13.0 ± 0.5 b | 5.4 ± 0.1 a | 73.6 ± 1.5 a |
n.s., not significant. Within each column and species, values followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05. AOA, antioxidant activity, GA, gallic acid; Q, quercetin.
Significant effects of AMF and Se on yield, dry matter, sugar, and antioxidants content of onion and garlic bulbs, compared to the untreated control.
| Treatment | Bulb Weight | Dry Matter | Monosaccharides | Total Sugars | TA | AA | Fl | PP | AOA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| AMF | * | * | |||||||
| Se | * | * | |||||||
| AMF + Se | ** | * | * | * | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| AMF | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
| Se | * | * | * | * | |||||
| AMF + Se | ** | * | * | ** | ** | * | * | ||
* indicates the significant difference at p ≤ 0.05, compared to the untreated control. ** indicates the significant difference at p ≤ 0.001, compared to the untreated control; TA, titratable acidity; AA, ascorbic acid; Fl, flavonoids; PP, phenolics; AOA, antioxidant activity.
Figure 2Effect of AMF on Se accumulation in garlic and onion bulbs.
Macroelements content in garlic and onion as affected by AMF and Se.
| Species | Treatment | Nitrates (mg·kg−1 d.w.) | Ca | K | Mg | Na | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g·kg−1 d.w.) | |||||||
| Garlic | Control | 1483 ± 58 a | 0.51 b | 15.5 c | 0.90 b | 403 c | 4.22 b |
| AMF | 1172 ± 37 b | 0.74 a | 14.2 c | 1.72 a | 832 a | 4.63 ab | |
| Se | 1404 ± 54 a | 0.60 b | 17.4 b | 1.72 a | 679 b | 4.92 ab | |
| AMF + Se | 1479 ± 55 a | 0.60 b | 19.1 a | 1.67 a | 567 b | 5.13 a | |
| Onion | Control | 1310 ± 30 a | 1.92 b | 16.7 c | 1.97 b | 809 b | 3.93 b |
| AMF | 1144 ± 39 b | 2.97 a | 20.6 b | 2.15 b | 748 b | 5.10 a | |
| Se | 1293 ± 42 a | 2.13 b | 17.0 c | 1.93 b | 1046 a | 4.05 b | |
| AMF + Se | 1261 ± 40 a | 2.08 b | 23.4 a | 2.43 a | 708 b | 4.97 a | |
Within each column and species, values followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3Changes in the macroelement concentration, compared to the untreated control, as affected by AMF and Se applications: (a) garlic, (b) onion.
Microelement content in garlic and onion bulbs as affected by AMF and selenium.
| Species | Treatment | B | Cu | Fe | Mn | Mo | Si | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg·kg−1 d.w.) | ||||||||
| Garlic | Control | 8.9 a | 6.4 | 58.2 ab | 11.8 | 0.25 d | 19.8 a | 38.2 c |
| AMF | 7.0 b | 6.9 | 57.9 ab | 12.4 | 0.35 c | 13.5 b | 41.7 bc | |
| Se | 8.0 ab | 7.0 | 51.7 b | 11.8 | 0.54 b | 20.8 a | 47.9 ab | |
| AMF + Se | 8.0 ab | 6.6 | 67.7 a | 10.4 | 0.71 a | 18.4 a | 54.1 a | |
| n.s. | n.s. | |||||||
| Onion | Control | 8.7 b | 6.3 b | 40.7 c | 9.1 ab | 0.25 b | 16.5 b | 28.5 b |
| AMF | 9.4 b | 9.0 a | 53.5 b | 8.9 b | 0.15 c | 17.9 b | 30.0 b | |
| Se | 11.0 a | 6.9 b | 48.1 c | 8.8 b | 0.22 b | 21.7 a | 27.8 b | |
| AMF + Se | 11.0 a | 8.5 a | 96.1 a | 11.4 a | 0.36 a | 25.0 a | 43.9 a | |
n.s., not significant. Within each column and species, values followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4Changes in the microelement content, compared to the untreated control, in garlic (a) and onion (b) bulbs as affected by AMF and Se application.
Significant effects of AMF and Se on the mineral composition of garlic and onion bulbs, compared to the untreated control.
| Treatment | B | Cu | Fe | Mn | Mo | Si | Zn | Ca | K | Mg | Na | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| AMF | * | * | * | |||||||||
| Se | * | * | * | * | ||||||||
| AMF + Se | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| AMF | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||
| Se | * | * | * | |||||||||
| AMF + Se | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
* indicates the significant difference at p ≤ 0.05, compared to the untreated control.