| Literature DB >> 32098151 |
Nadezhda Golubkina1, Leonid Krivenkov1, Agnieszka Sekara2, Viliana Vasileva3, Alessio Tallarita4, Gianluca Caruso4.
Abstract
The need to improve crop yield and quality, decreapan> class="Chemical">se the level of mineral fertilizers and pesticides/herbicides supply, and increase plants' immunity are important topics of agriculture in the 21st century. In this respect, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) may be considered as a crucial tool in the development of a modern environmentally friendly agriculture. The efficiency of AMF application is connected to genetic peculiarities of plant and AMF species, soil characteristics and environmental factors, including biotic and abiotic stresses, temperature, and precipitation. Among vegetable crops, Allium species are particularly reactive to soil mycorrhiza, due to their less expanded root apparatus surface compared to most other species. Moreover, Allium crops are economically important and able to synthesize powerful anti-carcinogen compounds, such as selenomethyl selenocysteine and gamma-glutamyl selenomethyl selenocysteine, which highlights the importance of the present detailed discussion about the AMF use prospects to enhance Allium plant growth and development. This review reports the available information describing the AMF effects on the seasonal, inter-, and intra-species variations of yield, biochemical characteristics, and mineral composition of Allium species, with a special focus on the selenium accumulation both in ordinary conditions and under selenium supply.Entities:
Keywords: AMF-related benefits; antioxidants; chlorophyll; garlic; leek; mineral elements; onion; production; shallot
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098151 PMCID: PMC7076476 DOI: 10.3390/plants9020279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) application on Allium species.
| AMF | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| Increase in antioxidant activity (AOA). Intervarietal differences in red, pink, yellow, and white | [ |
| The highest crop yield under | [ | |
| Enhancement of seedling growth, mineral element, water use efficiency, and 3 times yield increase (>35 t/ha). Highest increase of leaves’ surface promoted by | [ | |
|
| Field and greenhouse results: significant yield and growth increase both in winter and autumn. | [ |
| [ | ||
|
| Stimulation of nitrate reductase and glutathione synthetase activity in shoots and roots under water stress. | [ |
| AMF | High concentrations of N, P, K, and S in soil rhizosphere at 60 and 90 days from planting. | [ |
| Enhancement of growth and quality of onion seedlings, chlorophyll, soluble solids, proteins, and proline content in leaves. | [ | |
| Higher beneficial effect of joint AMF application compared to a single-fungus; a synergism between AMF and saprotrophic fungi. | [ | |
| AMF | AMF reduces soil pH more than non-inoculated plants in the presence of NH4. | [ |
|
| ||
|
| Interspecies differences in response to AMF inoculation. | [ |
|
| ||
| Interspecies differences to AMF response. No differences between the effects of the two AMF species. | [ | |
|
| ||
| AMF and dark septate fungal endophyte (DSE) associations | Significant correlations between soil P and microsclerotia and between soil N, K and AMF spore number. | [ |
| Rhizotech MB | Increase in Se accumulation. | [ |
|
| ||
| Highest colonization with (RI + FM) and (RI + CC). | [ | |
| AMF decreases nitrate leaching. | [ | |
| AMF + biochar | Protection from heavy metals. Biochar decreases colonization degree of AMF. | [ |
| AMF + compost + peat | Increase of leaf Zn and K, but no effect on dry matter, N, and P. | [ |
|
| ||
| The highest beneficial effect of | [ | |
|
| Increase in alliin content and alliinase activity. | [ |
| Highest colonization and yield at 20 kg·ha−1 P. | [ | |
|
| Increase of selenate accumulation. | [ |
Figure 1Varietal differences in A. fistulosum root colonization upon inoculation with G. fasciculatus (data re-elaborated from Tawaraya et al., 2001 [58]).
Figure 2Changes in carbohydrate content in A. cepa bulbs as a result of G. intraradices and G. mosseae inoculation (data re-elaborated from Lone et al., 2015 [71]).
Figure 3Changes in organic acids content in A. cepa cultivar Wolska upon AMF (Rhizophagus irregularis) inoculation (data re-elaborated from Rozpḁdek et al., 2016 [74]).
Effect of AMF–Se application on biochemical parameters and elemental composition of A. sativum and A. cepa (% to control plants) (data re-elaborated from Golubkina et al., 2020 [57]).
| Parameter | AMF | AMF + Se | Se | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Yield | 149 | 145 | 156 | 150 | 100 | 100 |
| Dry matter | 108 | 119 | 104 | 119 | 109 | 100 |
| monosaccharides | 100 | 168 | 175 | 200 | 129 | 141 |
| Total sugar | 119 | 100 | 121 | 100 | 119 | 100 |
| AOA | 100 | 115 | 108 | 137 | 100 | 100 |
| Flavonoids | 100 | 100 | 118 | 169 | 100 | 100 |
| Ascorbic acid | 100 | 100 | 110 | 124 | 100 | 112 |
| TA | 88 | 145 | 118 | 111 | 100 | 131 |
| Minerals | ||||||
| Se | 488 | 1000 | 28,200 | 43,800 | 21,300 | 33,200 |
| P | 110 | 130 | 122 | 130 | 110 | 100 |
| K | 100 | 123 | 123 | 140 | 112 | 100 |
| Ca | 145 | 155 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Mg | 191 | 100 | 186 | 123 | 191 | 100 |
| Na | 206 | 100 | 141 | 100 | 168 | 129 |
| B | 100 | 108 | 100 | 126 | 100 | 126 |
| Fe | 100 | 131 | 116 | 236 | 89 | 100 |
| Cu | 100 | 143 | 100 | 135 | 100 | 100 |
| Mo | 140 | 60 | 284 | 144 | 216 | 100 |
| Zn | 100 | 100 | 142 | 154 | 125 | 100 |
| Si | 68 | 108 | 100 | 152 | 100 | 132 |