| Literature DB >> 31936472 |
Sharon Pelo1, Vuyo Mavumengwana2, Ezekiel Green1.
Abstract
Plant endophytes are microbial sources of bioactive secondary metabolites, which mimic the natural compounds chemistry of their respective host plants in a similar manner. This study explored the isolation and identification of fungal endophytes, and investigated the antibacterial and antimycobacterial activity of their crude extracts. Fungal endophytes were isolated from Solanum mauritianum, identified using morphological traits and internal transcribed spacer ribosomal-deoxyribonucleic acid (ITS-rDNA) sequence analysis. Eight fungal endophytes were identified as Aureobasidium pullulans, Paracamarosporium leucadendri, Cladosporium sp., Collectotrichum boninense, Fusarium sp., Hyalodendriella sp., and Talaromyces sp., while Penicillium chrysogenum was isolated from the leaves and unripe fruits. Good activity was observed for the crude extracts of Paracamarosporium leucadendri inhibiting Mycobacterium bovis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 6 µg/mL. Crude extracts of Fusarium sp., showed activity at 9 μg/mL against M. bovis, M. smegmatis and K. pneumonia. In general, the crude extracts showed great activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and novel results for two mycobacteria species M. bovis and M. smegmatis. The results provide evidence of diverse fungal endophytes isolated from Solanum mauritianum, and evidence that fungal endophytes are a good source of bioactive compounds with pharmaceutical potential, particularly against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Solanum mauritianum and Penicillium chrysogenum; antimycobacterial; fungal endophytes; minimum inhibitory concentration; secondary metabolites
Year: 2020 PMID: 31936472 PMCID: PMC7013891 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Morphological observations and characteristics of the fungal endophytes.
| Isolates | Source | Macro and Microscopic Characteristics | Fungal Endophyte |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPS 28 | Stem | Flat cream white colonies which turn black with aging, chlamydospores, colonies are smooth with aging, they become slimy and shiny. |
|
| SPS 33 | Unripe fruit | Powdery green spores on the surface, yellow-white lower surface center. |
|
| SPS 35 | Unripe fruit | Black colonies with a slimy and shiny appearance on the surface. | |
| SPS 38 | Ripe fruit | Olivaceous green on the top and bottom greenish black, conidiophores which are dense and becoming powdery or velvety due to abundance, reverse of the colony is greenish-black. | |
| SPS 39 | Ripe fruit | Colonies grow flat on the media, they are white and turn pink with aging, release orange pigment into the media and spores are formed. | |
| SPS 40 | Leaves | Darker region at the center, yellow-white lower surface. Powdery green spores on the surface. |
|
| SPS 41 | Leaves | Centre is raised, floccose, sulcate center, bottom orange/white, top orange/yellow, soluble pigment faint orange and as it ages it produces green color spores. | |
| SPS 42 | Leaves | White cotton-like colonies turn brown/greenish with age starting at the center, bottom pale yellow or greenish. |
|
| SPS 43 | Ripe fruit | They start out as pale green on the plate and later the hyphae become pale brown in color, has hyphae that pale as spores. |
|
SPS: Sharon Pelo’s Sample, Lactophenol blue dye was used to observe at 40× magnification.
List of fungal taxonomic units identified using the molecular identification.
| Isolates | Accession No. | Close Relatives | Similarity (%) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPS 28 | MF926050 |
| 98 | Stem |
| SPS 33 | MF928760 |
| 100 | Unripe fruit |
| SPS 35 | MF928761 | 94 | Unripe fruit | |
| SPS 38 | MF928762 | 100 | Ripe fruit | |
| SPS 39 | MF928763 | 99 | Ripe fruit | |
| SPS 40 | MF928764 |
| 100 | Leaves |
| SPS 41 | MF928765 | 99 | Leaves | |
| SPS 42 | MF928766 |
| 100 | Leaves |
| SPS 43 | MF928767 |
| 99 | Ripe fruit |
Figure 1Molecular phylogenetic analysis of ITS1 and ITS4 sequences of all the fungal endophytes isolated from Solanum mauritianum alone, with the sequences from NCBI. The analysis was conducted with MEGA 7 using the Maximum Likelihood method.
Ethyl acetate crude extract yields from different endophytes.
| Fungal Endophytic Isolates | Weight of the Extract (g) |
|---|---|
| SPS 28 | 0.34 |
| SPS 33 | 0.46 |
| SPS 35 | 0.59 |
| SPS 38 | 1.02 |
| SPS 39 | 0.2 |
| SPS 40 | 1.24 |
| SPS 41 | 0.54 |
| SPS 43 | 1.23 |
Weight of the extracts extracted with ethyl acetate solvent (g) grams.
Antimicrobial activity of the fungal endophytes isolated from Salonum mauritianum.
| Crude Extracts of the Fungal Endophytes | Zone of Inhibition (mm) * | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram Positive | Gram Negative | Acid-Fast Stain | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7 ± 1.0 | 9.9 ± 05 | 10 ± 2.7 | 13 ± 1.0 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 11 ± 1.0 | 10.7 ± 0.6 |
|
| - | 7.3 ± 1.5 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 11.7 ± 0.6 | 11 ± 1.0 | 7.7 ± 1.5 | 13 ± 1.0 |
| 10.3 ± 1.5 | 7.3±0.6 | 14.7 ± 0.6 | 8.7 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | 12.7 ± 2.3 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 8.7 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 10.7 ± 1.5 | 11.7 ± 0.6 | 23 ± 2.7 | 14 ± 1.7 | - | |
| 11.3 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 10.7 ± 3.5 | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 12.7 ± 2.3 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 12.3 ± 1.2 | 8.7 ± 1.5 | - | 11.7 ± 0.6 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 14 ± 2.9 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | |
| 13.7 ± 0.6 | 8.7 ± 2.3 | - | 12.3 ± 2.1 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 10 ± 2.9 | 11.3 ± 2.3 | |
| - | 14.7 ± 1.2 | - | 17.3 ± 2.1 | 7.7 ± 2.1 | 8 ± 1.7 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 11 ± 1.0 | 12.7 ± 2.5 | 18.3 ± 0.6 | 19 ± 1.0 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | |
| Positive control | 27 ± 1.7 | 32.3 ± 0.3 | 26 ± 1.7 | 32.6 ± 0.3 | 26 ± 1.7 | 27 ± 1.7 | 27 ± 1.7 |
Bs: Bacillus subtilis, Sa: Staphylococcus aureus, Kp: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Ec: Escherichia coli, Pa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mb: Mycobacterium bovis and Ms: Mycobacterium smegmatis. Positive control: Rifampicin (40 µg/mL). *: mean diameter on zone of inhibition ± Standard Deviation (n = 3). -: no zones of inhibition were observed.
Minimum inhibitory concentrating assay of the fungal secondary metabolites.
| Crude Extracts of the Fungal Endophytes | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (mg/mL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram Positive | Gram Negative | Acid-Fast Stain | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 0.17 | 2.13 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
|
| 1.16 | 2.33 | 1.16 | 0.006 | 1.16 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 2.91 |
| 6.37 | 1.28 | 6.38 | 0.049 | 0.049 | 0.049 | 0.049 | 1.28 | |
| 0.03 | 5 | 1.25 | 0.009 | 1.25 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.009 | |
| 7.38 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.03 | 5 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| 5.75 | 1.15 | 5.57 | 0.02 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| 0.75 | 6 | 3 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| 1.69 | 3.38 | 1.35 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| Positive control * | 0.0019 | 0.0019 | 0.0019 | 0.0019 | 0.0019 | 0.0019 | 0.0019 | 0.0019 |
| Negative control † | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Bs: Bacillus subtilis, Sa: Staphylococcus aureus, Ko: Klebsiella oxytoca, Kp: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Ec: Escherichia coli, Pa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mb: Mycobacterium bovis and Ms: Mycobacterium smegmatis. Positive control *: Rifampicin (40 µg/mL). Negative control †: DMSO (10%).