Literature DB >> 8057694

Lower Medicare mortality among a set of hospitals known for good nursing care.

L H Aiken1, H L Smith, E T Lake.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate whether hospitals known to be good places to practice nursing have lower Medicare mortality than hospitals that are otherwise similar with respect to a variety of non-nursing organizational characteristics. Research to date on determinants of hospital mortality has not focused on the organization of nursing. We capitalize on the existence of a set of studies of 39 hospitals that, for reasons other than patient outcomes, have been singled out as hospitals known for good nursing care. We match these "magnet" hospitals with 195 control hospitals, selected from all nonmagnet U.S. hospitals with over 100 Medicare discharges, using a multivariate matched sampling procedure that controls for hospital characteristics. Medicare mortality rates of magnet versus control hospitals are compared using variance components models, which pool information on the five matches per magnet hospital, and adjust for differences in patient composition as measured by predicted mortality. The magnet hospitals' observed mortality rates are 7.7% lower (9 fewer deaths per 1,000 Medicare discharges) than the matched control hospitals (P = .011). After adjusting for differences in predicted mortality, the magnet hospitals have a 4.6% lower mortality rate (P = .026 [95% confidence interval 0.9 to 9.4 fewer deaths per 1,000]). The same factors that lead hospitals to be identified as effective from the standpoint of the organization of nursing care are associated with lower mortality among Medicare patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8057694     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199408000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  75 in total

1.  Reengineering and the hospital staff nurse.

Authors:  T Fulmer; M Mezey; A L Siu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Continuity of hospital care: beyond the question of personal contact.

Authors:  Unni Krogstad; Dag Hofoss; Per Hjortdahl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-05

3.  Global nursing shortages.

Authors:  James Buchan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

4.  Hospital organisation and outcomes.

Authors:  L H Aiken; D M Sloane; J Sochalski
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

5.  Organisational change and quality of health care: an evolving international agenda.

Authors:  M McKee; L Aiken; A M Rafferty; J Sochalski
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-03

6.  Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals.

Authors:  Lesly A Kelly; Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.737

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Peter T L Choi; Christina Lacchetti; Bruce Weaver; Holger J Schünemann; Ted Haines; John N Lavis; Brydon J B Grant; David R S Haslam; Mohit Bhandari; Terrence Sullivan; Deborah J Cook; Stephen D Walter; Maureen Meade; Humaira Khan; Neera Bhatnagar; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  An alternative view on "an alternative paradigm".

Authors:  Sandra Ward; Heidi Scharf Donovan; Ronald C Serlin
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Building an international nursing outcomes research agenda.

Authors:  Robyn B Cheung; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci)       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.085

Review 10.  Does what nurses do affect clinical outcomes for hospitalized patients? A review of the literature.

Authors:  J L Lee; B L Chang; M L Pearson; K L Kahn; L V Rubenstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.