Literature DB >> 31928868

Parrots Voluntarily Help Each Other to Obtain Food Rewards.

Désirée Brucks1, Auguste M P von Bayern2.   

Abstract

Helping others to obtain benefits, even at a cost to oneself, poses an evolutionary puzzle [1]. While kin selection explains such "selfless" acts among relatives, only reciprocity (paying back received favors) entails fitness benefits for unrelated individuals [2]. So far, experimental evidence for both prosocial helping (providing voluntary assistance for achieving an action-based goal) and reciprocity has been reported in a few mammals but no avian species [3]. In order to gain insights into the evolutionary origins of these behaviors, the capacity of non-mammalian species for prosociality and for reciprocity needs to be investigated. We tested two parrot species in an instrumental-helping paradigm involving "token transfer." Here, actors could provide tokens to their neighbor, who could exchange them with an experimenter for food. To verify whether the parrots understood the task's contingencies, we systematically varied the presence of a partner and the possibility for exchange. We found that African grey parrots voluntarily and spontaneously transferred tokens to conspecific partners, whereas significantly fewer transfers occurred in the control conditions. Transfers were affected by the strength of the dyads' affiliation and partially by the receivers' attention-getting behaviors. Furthermore, the birds reciprocated the help once the roles were reversed. Blue-headed macaws, in contrast, transferred hardly any tokens. Species differences in social tolerance might explain this discrepancy. These findings show that instrumental helping based on a prosocial attitude, accompanied but potentially not sustained by reciprocity, is present in parrots, suggesting that this capacity evolved convergently in this avian group and mammals.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  instrumental helping; parrots; prosociality; reciprocity; social tolerance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31928868     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  6 in total

1.  Sex-specific effects of cooperative breeding and colonial nesting on prosociality in corvids.

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Thomas Bugnyar; Michael Griesser; Marietta Hengl; Ei-Ichi Izawa; Tim Oortwijn; Christiane Rössler; Clara Scheer; Martina Schiestl; Masaki Suyama; Alex H Taylor; Lisa-Claire Vanhooland; Auguste Mp von Bayern; Yvonne Zürcher; Jorg Jm Massen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Prosocial and antisocial choices in a monogamous cichlid with biparental care.

Authors:  Shun Satoh; Redouan Bshary; Momoko Shibasaki; Seishiro Inaba; Shumpei Sogawa; Takashi Hotta; Satoshi Awata; Masanori Kohda
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm.

Authors:  Jonas Verspeek; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Daan W Laméris; Nicky Staes; Jeroen M G Stevens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Carrion Crows and Azure-Winged Magpies Show No Prosocial Tendencies When Tested in a Token Transfer Paradigm.

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Jeroen S Zewald; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-08

6.  Azure-winged magpies' decisions to share food are contingent on the presence or absence of food for the recipient.

Authors:  Jorg J M Massen; Sofia M Haley; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.