Literature DB >> 33741978

Prosocial and antisocial choices in a monogamous cichlid with biparental care.

Shun Satoh1,2, Redouan Bshary3, Momoko Shibasaki4, Seishiro Inaba4, Shumpei Sogawa4, Takashi Hotta5, Satoshi Awata4, Masanori Kohda4.   

Abstract

Human society is cooperative and characterized by spontaneous prosociality. Comparative studies on endotherm vertebrates suggest that social interdependence causes the evolution of proactive prosociality. To test the generality of this hypothesis, we modify a prosocial choice task for application to the convict cichlid, Amatitlania nigrofasciata, a monogamous fish with biparental care and a strong pair bond. We also affirm that male subjects learn to favor prosocial choices when their mates are the recipients in a neighboring tank. When the neighboring tank is empty, males choose randomly. Furthermore, in the absence of their mates, males behave prosocially toward a stranger female. However, if the mate of the subjects is also visible in the third tank, or if a male is a potential recipient, then subjects make antisocial choices. To conclude, fish may show both spontaneous prosocial and antisocial behaviors according to their social relationships with conspecifics and the overall social context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33741978      PMCID: PMC7979913          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22075-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  21 in total

1.  The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation.

Authors:  J M Burkart; O Allon; F Amici; C Fichtel; C Finkenwirth; A Heschl; J Huber; K Isler; Z K Kosonen; E Martins; E J Meulman; R Richiger; K Rueth; B Spillmann; S Wiesendanger; C P van Schaik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Sarah F Brosnan; Jennifer Vonk; Joseph Henrich; Daniel J Povinelli; Amanda S Richardson; Susan P Lambeth; Jenny Mascaro; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Parrots Voluntarily Help Each Other to Obtain Food Rewards.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Auguste M P von Bayern
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees.

Authors:  Victoria Horner; J Devyn Carter; Malini Suchak; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation.

Authors:  Jorge Moll; Frank Krueger; Roland Zahn; Matteo Pardini; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically.

Authors:  Judith M Burkart; Ernst Fehr; Charles Efferson; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Kristin Leimgruber; Amanda R Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Proactive prosociality in a cooperatively breeding corvid, the azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyana).

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Clara Scheer; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task.

Authors:  Julen Hernandez-Lallement; Marijn van Wingerden; Christine Marx; Milan Srejic; Tobias Kalenscher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Task design influences prosociality in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Bailey R House; Joan B Silk; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm.

Authors:  Jonas Verspeek; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Daan W Laméris; Nicky Staes; Jeroen M G Stevens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.