Literature DB >> 34073851

Carrion Crows and Azure-Winged Magpies Show No Prosocial Tendencies When Tested in a Token Transfer Paradigm.

Lisa Horn1, Jeroen S Zewald2, Thomas Bugnyar1, Jorg J M Massen1,2.   

Abstract

To study the evolution of humans' cooperative nature, researchers have recently sought comparisons with other species. Studies investigating corvids, for example, showed that carrion crows and azure-winged magpies delivered food to group members when tested in naturalistic or simple experimental paradigms. Here, we investigated whether we could replicate these positive findings when testing the same two species in a token transfer paradigm. After training the birds to exchange tokens with an experimenter for food rewards, we tested whether they would also transfer tokens to other birds, when they did not have the opportunity to exchange the tokens themselves. To control for the effects of motivation, and of social or stimulus enhancement, we tested each individual in three additional control conditions. We witnessed very few attempts and/or successful token transfers, and those few instances did not occur more frequently in the test condition than in the controls, which would suggest that the birds lack prosocial tendencies. Alternatively, we propose that this absence of prosociality may stem from the artificial nature and cognitive complexity of the token transfer task. Consequently, our findings highlight the strong impact of methodology on animals' capability to exhibit prosocial tendencies and stress the importance of comparing multiple experimental paradigms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corvus corone; Cyanopica cyana; comparative methods; cooperation; corvid; instrumental helping; prosociality

Year:  2021        PMID: 34073851     DOI: 10.3390/ani11061526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  39 in total

1.  Do African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) know what a human experimenter does and does not see?

Authors:  F Péron; C Chardard; L Nagle; D Bovet
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost.

Authors:  Martin Schmelz; Sebastian Grueneisen; Alihan Kabalak; Jürgen Jost; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence suggesting that desire-state attribution may govern food sharing in Eurasian jays.

Authors:  Ljerka Ostojić; Rachael C Shaw; Lucy G Cheke; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees.

Authors:  Victoria Horner; J Devyn Carter; Malini Suchak; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Socially learned preferences for differentially rewarded tokens in the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  The selfish nature of generosity: harassment and food sharing in primates.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Proactive prosociality in a cooperatively breeding corvid, the azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyana).

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Clara Scheer; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model.

Authors:  Ana Rakita; Nenad Nikolić; Michael Mildner; Johannes Matiasek; Adelheid Elbe-Bürger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Ravens (Corvus corax) are indifferent to the gains of conspecific recipients or human partners in experimental tasks.

Authors:  Felice Di Lascio; François Nyffeler; Redouan Bshary; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 10.  Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species.

Authors:  S Marshall-Pescini; R Dale; M Quervel-Chaumette; F Range
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm.

Authors:  Jonas Verspeek; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Daan W Laméris; Nicky Staes; Jeroen M G Stevens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.