Literature DB >> 31928799

Estimating the Relevance of Historical Red Flags in the Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma.

Kent P Hymel1, Gloria Lee2, Stephen Boos3, Wouter A Karst4, Andrew Sirotnak5, Suzanne B Haney6, Antoinette Laskey7, Ming Wang8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To replicate the previously published finding that the absence of a history of trauma in a child with obvious traumatic head injuries demonstrates high specificity and high positive predictive value (PPV) for abusive head trauma. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a deidentified, cross-sectional dataset containing prospective data on 346 young children with acute head injury hospitalized for intensive care across 18 sites between 2010 and 2013, to estimate the diagnostic relevance of a caregiver's specific denial of any trauma, changing history of accidental trauma, or history of accidental trauma inconsistent with the child's gross motor skills. Cases were categorized as definite or not definite abusive head trauma based solely on patients' clinical and radiologic findings. For each presumptive historical "red flag," we calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratio (LR) with 95% CI for definite abusive head trauma in all patients and also in cohorts with normal, abnormal, or persistent abnormal neurologic status.
RESULTS: A caregiver's specific denial of any trauma demonstrated a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.94), PPV of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.88), and a positive LR (LR+) of 4.83 (95% CI, 3.07-7.61) for definite abusive head trauma in all patients. Specificity and LR+ were lowest-not highest-in patients with persistent neurologic abnormalities. The 2 other historical red flags showed similar trends.
CONCLUSIONS: A caregiver's specific denial of any trauma, changing history of accidental trauma, or history of accidental trauma that is developmentally inconsistent are each highly specific (>0.90) but may provide weaker support than previously reported for a diagnosis of abusive head trauma in patients with persistent neurologic abnormalities.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31928799      PMCID: PMC7042052          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  17 in total

1.  Validation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Robin Foster; Terra N Frazier; Michael Stoiko; LeeAnn M Christie; Nancy S Harper; Kerri Weeks; Christopher L Carroll; Phil Hyden; Andrew Sirotnak; Edward Truemper; Amy E Ornstein; Ming Wang
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Understanding forensic expert evaluative evidence: A study of the perception of verbal expressions of the strength of evidence.

Authors:  Eleanor Arscott; Ruth Morgan; Georgina Meakin; James French
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Can the initial history predict whether a child with a head injury has been abused?

Authors:  Joeli Hettler; David S Greenes
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Douglas F Willson; Stephen C Boos; Deborah A Pullin; Karen Homa; Douglas J Lorenz; Bruce E Herman; Jeanine M Graf; Reena Isaac; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Sandeep K Narang
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Characteristics that distinguish abusive from nonabusive head trauma among young children who underwent head computed tomography in Japan.

Authors:  Takeo Fujiwara; Makiko Okuyama; Mikiko Miyasaka
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  S Maguire; N Pickerd; D Farewell; M Mann; V Tempest; A M Kemp
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse.

Authors:  Wendy G Lane; David M Rubin; Ragin Monteith; Cindy W Christian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities and Bias in the Evaluation and Reporting of Abusive Head Trauma.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Antoinette L Laskey; Kathryn R Crowell; Ming Wang; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Terra N Frazier; Kelly S Tieves; Robin Foster; Kerri Weeks
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  What factors affect the identification and reporting of child abuse-related fractures?

Authors:  Wendy G Lane; Howard Dubowitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Abusive head trauma and accidental head injury: a 20-year comparative study of referrals to a hospital child protection team.

Authors:  Patrick Kelly; Simon John; Andrea L Vincent; Peter Reed
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Parenchymal Insults in Abuse-A Potential Key to Diagnosis.

Authors:  Marguerite M Caré
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.