Takeo Fujiwara1, Makiko Okuyama, Mikiko Miyasaka. 1. Section of Behavioral Science, Department of Health Promotion and Research, National Institute of Public Health, Saitama, Japan. tfujiwara@niph.go.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Distinguishing abusive head trauma in young children from other diseases by symptoms is difficult in practice. Comparisons between abusive and nonabusive head trauma in young children in Japan, where computed tomography is widely and easily available, might contribute to identifying markers of abusive head trauma that differ from that in Western countries. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of abusive and nonabusive head trauma in young children in Japan. METHODS: A comparative case series study involving a retrospective medical chart and social work record review of children who were aged 0 to 2 years, visited the National Center for Child Health and Development (Tokyo, Japan) from March 1, 2002, to December 31, 2005, and underwent computed tomography scanning because of suspected intracranial injury was performed. Patients (N = 260) were identified and classified as having either abusive or nonabusive head trauma on the basis of the published definition. Demographic and perinatal characteristics, injury history, clinical presentation, and outcomes were compared by using chi2 and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Patients with abusive head trauma were significantly younger than patients with nonabusive head trauma and had a peak at approximately 2 to 4 and 7 to 9 months. Patients with abusive head trauma more likely presented no injury history by the caregiver, neurologic symptoms (unconsciousness, seizure, paralysis), subdural hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhages. Although patients with abusive head trauma had severe clinical outcomes, only 32% of them were separated from the caregiver by social welfare services. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the several clinical markers to detect abusive head trauma at a medical visit, including an absence of injury history, neurologic symptoms, subdural hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhage. These markers can be used to detect abusive head trauma cases by physicians and social welfare workers to protect children from additional abuse.
OBJECTIVE: Distinguishing abusive head trauma in young children from other diseases by symptoms is difficult in practice. Comparisons between abusive and nonabusive head trauma in young children in Japan, where computed tomography is widely and easily available, might contribute to identifying markers of abusive head trauma that differ from that in Western countries. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of abusive and nonabusive head trauma in young children in Japan. METHODS: A comparative case series study involving a retrospective medical chart and social work record review of children who were aged 0 to 2 years, visited the National Center for Child Health and Development (Tokyo, Japan) from March 1, 2002, to December 31, 2005, and underwent computed tomography scanning because of suspected intracranial injury was performed. Patients (N = 260) were identified and classified as having either abusive or nonabusive head trauma on the basis of the published definition. Demographic and perinatal characteristics, injury history, clinical presentation, and outcomes were compared by using chi2 and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS:Patients with abusive head trauma were significantly younger than patients with nonabusive head trauma and had a peak at approximately 2 to 4 and 7 to 9 months. Patients with abusive head trauma more likely presented no injury history by the caregiver, neurologic symptoms (unconsciousness, seizure, paralysis), subdural hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhages. Although patients with abusive head trauma had severe clinical outcomes, only 32% of them were separated from the caregiver by social welfare services. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the several clinical markers to detect abusive head trauma at a medical visit, including an absence of injury history, neurologic symptoms, subdural hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhage. These markers can be used to detect abusive head trauma cases by physicians and social welfare workers to protect children from additional abuse.
Authors: Joshua L Goldstein; Daniel Leonhardt; Natalie Kmytyuk; Francine Kim; Deli Wang; Mark S Wainwright Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Kent P Hymel; Gloria Lee; Stephen Boos; Wouter A Karst; Andrew Sirotnak; Suzanne B Haney; Antoinette Laskey; Ming Wang Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jonathan P Roach; Shannon N Acker; Denis D Bensard; Andrew P Sirotnak; Frederick M Karrer; David A Partrick Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Daphne M Hasbani; Alexis A Topjian; Stuart H Friess; Todd J Kilbaugh; Robert A Berg; Cindy W Christian; Dennis J Dlugos; Jimmy Huh; Nicholas S Abend Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Xin Xia; Joe Xiang; Jianbo Shao; Gary A Smith; Chuanhua Yu; Huiping Zhu; Huiyun Xiang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 3.390