Literature DB >> 25404722

Validation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.

Kent P Hymel1, Veronica Armijo-Garcia2, Robin Foster3, Terra N Frazier4, Michael Stoiko5, LeeAnn M Christie6, Nancy S Harper7, Kerri Weeks8, Christopher L Carroll9, Phil Hyden10, Andrew Sirotnak11, Edward Truemper12, Amy E Ornstein13, Ming Wang14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: To reduce missed cases of pediatric abusive head trauma (AHT), Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network investigators derived a 4-variable AHT clinical prediction rule (CPR) with sensitivity of .96. Our objective was to validate the screening performance of this AHT CPR in a new, equivalent patient population.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study. Applying the same inclusion criteria, definitional criteria for AHT, and methods used in the completed derivation study, Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network investigators captured complete clinical, historical, and radiologic data on 291 acutely head-injured children <3 years of age admitted to PICUs at 14 participating sites, sorted them into comparison groups of abusive and nonabusive head trauma, and measured the screening performance of the AHT CPR.
RESULTS: In this new patient population, the 4-variable AHT CPR demonstrated sensitivity of .96, specificity of .46, positive predictive value of .55, negative predictive value of .93, positive likelihood ratio of 1.67, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.09. Secondary analysis revealed that the AHT CPR identified 98% of study patients who were ultimately diagnosed with AHT.
CONCLUSIONS: Four readily available variables (acute respiratory compromise before admission; bruising of the torso, ears, or neck; bilateral or interhemispheric subdural hemorrhages or collections; and any skull fractures other than an isolated, unilateral, nondiastatic, linear, parietal fracture) identify AHT with high sensitivity in young, acutely head-injured children admitted to the PICU.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abusive head trauma; child abuse; decision rule; nonaccidental trauma; prediction rule; predictors; screening tools

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25404722     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  17 in total

1.  Estimating the Relevance of Historical Red Flags in the Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Gloria Lee; Stephen Boos; Wouter A Karst; Andrew Sirotnak; Suzanne B Haney; Antoinette Laskey; Ming Wang
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma after abuse evaluation.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Ming Wang; Vernon M Chinchilli; Wouter A Karst; Douglas F Willson; Mark S Dias; Bruce E Herman; Christopher L Carroll; Suzanne B Haney; Reena Isaac
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2018-12-11

3.  Understanding the importance of spinal injury in abusive head trauma (AHT).

Authors:  Arabinda K Choudhary
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-01-04

4.  Radiologic head CT interpretation errors in pediatric abusive and non-abusive head trauma patients.

Authors:  Stephen F Kralik; Whitney Finke; Isaac C Wu; Roberta A Hibbard; Ralph A Hicks; Chang Y Ho
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-11

5.  Research priorities for a multi-center child abuse pediatrics network - CAPNET.

Authors:  Daniel M Lindberg; Joanne N Wood; Kristine A Campbell; Philip V Scribano; Antoinette Laskey; John M Leventhal; Mary Clyde Pierce; Desmond K Runyan
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2017-02-03

6.  Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Wouter Karst; Mark Marinello; Bruce E Herman; Terra N Frazier; Christopher L Carroll; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Matthew Musick; Kerri Weeks; Suzanne B Haney; Afshin Pashai; Ming Wang
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2022-01-22

7.  The CAPNET multi-center data set for child physical abuse: Rationale, methods and scope.

Authors:  Devon M Kratchman; Porcia Vaughn; Ligia Batista Silverman; Kristine A Campbell; Daniel M Lindberg; James D Anderst; Angela N Bachim; Rachel P Berger; Kent P Hymel; Megan Letson; John D Melville; Joanne N Wood
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2022-06-27

8.  External Validation of the PediBIRN Screening Tool for Abusive Head Trauma in Pediatric Emergency Department Settings.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Amanda K Fingarson; Mary Clyde Pierce; Kim Kaczor; Kathi L Makoroff; Ming Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 1.602

9.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities and Bias in the Evaluation and Reporting of Abusive Head Trauma.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Antoinette L Laskey; Kathryn R Crowell; Ming Wang; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Terra N Frazier; Kelly S Tieves; Robin Foster; Kerri Weeks
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  A Cluster Randomized Trial to Reduce Missed Abusive Head Trauma in Pediatric Intensive Care Settings.

Authors:  Kent P Hymel; Veronica Armijo-Garcia; Matthew Musick; Mark Marinello; Bruce E Herman; Kerri Weeks; Suzanne B Haney; Terra N Frazier; Christopher L Carroll; Natalie N Kissoon; Reena Isaac; Robin Foster; Kristine A Campbell; Kelly S Tieves; Nina Livingston; Ashley Bucher; Maria C Woosley; Dorinda Escamilla-Padilla; Nancy Jaimon; Lucinda Kustka; Ming Wang; Vernon M Chinchilli; Mark S Dias; Jennie Noll
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.