Yuhua Zhang1, Xiaolin Wang2, Srinivas R Sadda3, Mark E Clark4, C Douglas Witherspoon4, Richard F Spaide5, Cynthia Owsley4, Christine A Curcio4. 1. Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: yzhang@doheny.org. 2. Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 3. Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 5. Vitreous-Retina-Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the progression and regression of individual subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs) and surrounding photoreceptors and retina in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) over a 3.5-year period using multimodal imaging including adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Four patients with intermediate AMD. METHODS: Six eyes of 4 patients with intermediate AMD each were imaged 4 times over 3.5 years. Five eyes of 3 patients showed only SDD and no drusen. Subretinal drusenoid deposit presence and progression were assessed by multimodal imaging and a 3-stage grading system based on spectral-domain (SD) OCT. Morphologic features and the fine structure of individual SDD lesions identified at baseline were examined by AOSLO at follow-up visits. Reflectivity of photoreceptors surrounding SDD were assessed with AOSLO and SD OCT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphologic features, fine structure, and size of individual SDD lesions by AOSLO; photoreceptor integrity surrounding SDD via AOSLO and SD OCT; and retinal layer thicknesses via SD OCT. RESULTS: Individual SDDs followed independent lifecycle trajectories, exhibiting growth, shrinkage, fusion, and disappearance. Alterations in shape, morphologic features, and internal structure were not obviously the result of the presence of invading phagocytes. Of 822 lesions across all stages examined at baseline, 566 (69%) grew, 123 (15%) shrank, 47 (6%) remained of similar size, 86 (11%) disappeared, and 5 (0.6%) reappeared after regression. A return of characteristic photoreceptor reflectivity in AOSLO (punctate) and in SD OCT (prominent ellipsoid zone) was observed after regression of some SDD in 5 eyes of 4 patients. All eyes exhibited thinning of photoreceptor layers, despite intact retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), to approximately 70% of baseline thicknesses, as well as poorly visible or undetectable outer retinal bands. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and SD OCT imaging of individual SDDs over 3.5 years revealed independent trajectories of progression and regression, believed to reflect the activities of local outer retinal cells. Restoration of some photoreceptor reflectivity and intact RPE after SDD regression should be seen in the larger context of outer retinal atrophy, previously suggested as a new form of advanced AMD, and herein replicated.
PURPOSE: To describe the progression and regression of individual subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs) and surrounding photoreceptors and retina in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) over a 3.5-year period using multimodal imaging including adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Four patients with intermediate AMD. METHODS: Six eyes of 4 patients with intermediate AMD each were imaged 4 times over 3.5 years. Five eyes of 3 patients showed only SDD and no drusen. Subretinal drusenoid deposit presence and progression were assessed by multimodal imaging and a 3-stage grading system based on spectral-domain (SD) OCT. Morphologic features and the fine structure of individual SDD lesions identified at baseline were examined by AOSLO at follow-up visits. Reflectivity of photoreceptors surrounding SDD were assessed with AOSLO and SD OCT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphologic features, fine structure, and size of individual SDD lesions by AOSLO; photoreceptor integrity surrounding SDD via AOSLO and SD OCT; and retinal layer thicknesses via SD OCT. RESULTS: Individual SDDs followed independent lifecycle trajectories, exhibiting growth, shrinkage, fusion, and disappearance. Alterations in shape, morphologic features, and internal structure were not obviously the result of the presence of invading phagocytes. Of 822 lesions across all stages examined at baseline, 566 (69%) grew, 123 (15%) shrank, 47 (6%) remained of similar size, 86 (11%) disappeared, and 5 (0.6%) reappeared after regression. A return of characteristic photoreceptor reflectivity in AOSLO (punctate) and in SD OCT (prominent ellipsoid zone) was observed after regression of some SDD in 5 eyes of 4 patients. All eyes exhibited thinning of photoreceptor layers, despite intact retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), to approximately 70% of baseline thicknesses, as well as poorly visible or undetectable outer retinal bands. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and SD OCT imaging of individual SDDs over 3.5 years revealed independent trajectories of progression and regression, believed to reflect the activities of local outer retinal cells. Restoration of some photoreceptor reflectivity and intact RPE after SDD regression should be seen in the larger context of outer retinal atrophy, previously suggested as a new form of advanced AMD, and herein replicated.
Authors: Yuhua Zhang; Xiaolin Wang; Pooja Godara; Tianjiao Zhang; Mark E Clark; C Douglas Witherspoon; Richard F Spaide; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Robyn H Guymer; Philip J Rosenfeld; Christine A Curcio; Frank G Holz; Giovanni Staurenghi; K Bailey Freund; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Janet Sparrow; Richard F Spaide; Adnan Tufail; Usha Chakravarthy; Glenn J Jaffe; Karl Csaky; David Sarraf; Jordi M Monés; Ramin Tadayoni; Juan Grunwald; Ferdinando Bottoni; Sandra Liakopoulos; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Sergio Pagliarini; Emily Y Chew; Francesco Viola; Monika Fleckenstein; Barbara A Blodi; Tock Han Lim; Victor Chong; Jerry Lutty; Alan C Bird; Srinivas R Sadda Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yuhua Zhang; Xiaolin Wang; Ernesto Blanco Rivero; Mark E Clark; Clark Douglas Witherspoon; Richard F Spaide; Christopher A Girkin; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Robyn H Guymer; Zhichao Wu; Lauren A B Hodgson; Emily Caruso; Kate H Brassington; Nicole Tindill; Khin Zaw Aung; Myra B McGuinness; Erica L Fletcher; Fred K Chen; Usha Chakravarthy; Jennifer J Arnold; Wilson J Heriot; Shane R Durkin; Jia Jia Lek; Colin A Harper; Sanjeewa S Wickremasinghe; Sukhpal S Sandhu; Elizabeth K Baglin; Pyrawy Sharangan; Sabine Braat; Chi D Luu Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Leon von der Emde; Luis de Sisternes; Joelle A Hallak; Theodore Leng; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Frank G Holz; Monika Fleckenstein; Daniel L Rubin Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Shyamanga Borooah; Vasileios Papastavrou; Leonardo Lando; Jonathan Han; Jonathan H Lin; Radha Ayyagari; Baljean Dhillon; Andrew C Browning Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2020-12-22
Authors: Gregor S Reiter; Reinhard Told; Markus Schranz; Lukas Baumann; Georgios Mylonas; Stefan Sacu; Andreas Pollreisz; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Christine A Curcio; Gerald McGwin; Srinivas R Sadda; Zhihong Hu; Mark E Clark; Kenneth R Sloan; Thomas Swain; Jason N Crosson; Cynthia Owsley Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Ethan A Rossi; Nathaniel Norberg; Chiara Eandi; Celine Chaumette; Saloni Kapoor; Laura Le; Valerie C Snyder; Joseph N Martel; Josselin Gautier; Kiyoko Gocho; Kunal K Dansingani; Jay Chhablani; Angelo Arleo; Sarah Mrejen; José-Alain Sahel; Kate Grieve; Michel Paques Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 3.048
Authors: Marlene Sassmannshausen; Maximilian Pfau; Sarah Thiele; Rolf Fimmers; Julia S Steinberg; Monika Fleckenstein; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 4.799