Maximilian Pfau1,2, Leon von der Emde2, Luis de Sisternes3, Joelle A Hallak4, Theodore Leng5, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg2,6, Frank G Holz2, Monika Fleckenstein2,6, Daniel L Rubin1. 1. Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 3. Research and Development, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California. 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago. 5. Byers Eye Institute at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 6. John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Abstract
Importance: Sensitive outcome measures for disease progression are needed for treatment trials in geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Objective: To quantify photoreceptor degeneration outside regions of GA in eyes with nonexudative AMD, to evaluate its association with future GA progression, and to characterize its spatio-temporal progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: Monocenter cohort study (Directional Spread in Geographic Atrophy [NCT02051998]) and analysis of data from a normative data study at a tertiary referral center. One hundred fifty-eight eyes of 89 patients with a mean (SD) age of 77.7 (7.1) years, median area of GA of 8.87 mm2 (IQR, 4.09-15.60), and median follow-up of 1.1 years (IQR, 0.52-1.7 years), as well as 93 normal eyes from 93 participants. Exposures: Longitudinal spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) volume scans (121 B-scans across 30° × 25°) were segmented with a deep-learning pipeline and standardized in a pointwise manner with age-adjusted normal data (z scores). Outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor inner segment (IS), and outer segment (OS) thickness were quantified along evenly spaced contour lines surrounding GA lesions. Linear mixed models were applied to assess the association between photoreceptor-related imaging features and GA progression rates and characterize the pattern of photoreceptor degeneration over time. Main Outcomes and Measures: Association of ONL thinning with follow-up time (after adjusting for age, retinal topography [z score], and distance to the GA boundary). Results: The study included 158 eyes of 89 patients (51 women and 38 men) with a mean (SD) age of 77.7 (7.1) years. The fully automated B-scan segmentation was accurate (dice coefficient, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.80-0.85; compared with manual markings) and revealed a marked interpatient variability in photoreceptor degeneration. The ellipsoid zone (EZ) loss-to-GA boundary distance and OS thickness were prognostic for future progression rates. Outer nuclear layer and IS thinning over time was significant even when adjusting for age and proximity to the GA boundary (estimates of -0.16 μm/y; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.02; and -0.17 μm/y; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.09). Conclusions and Relevance: Distinct and progressive alterations of photoreceptor laminae (exceeding GA spatially) were detectable and quantifiable. The degree of photoreceptor degeneration outside of regions of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy varied markedly between eyes and was associated with future GA progression. Macula-wide photoreceptor laminae thinning represents a potential candidate end point to monitor treatment effects beyond mere GA lesion size progression.
Importance: Sensitive outcome measures for disease progression are needed for treatment trials in geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Objective: To quantify photoreceptor degeneration outside regions of GA in eyes with nonexudative AMD, to evaluate its association with future GA progression, and to characterize its spatio-temporal progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: Monocenter cohort study (Directional Spread in Geographic Atrophy [NCT02051998]) and analysis of data from a normative data study at a tertiary referral center. One hundred fifty-eight eyes of 89 patients with a mean (SD) age of 77.7 (7.1) years, median area of GA of 8.87 mm2 (IQR, 4.09-15.60), and median follow-up of 1.1 years (IQR, 0.52-1.7 years), as well as 93 normal eyes from 93 participants. Exposures: Longitudinal spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) volume scans (121 B-scans across 30° × 25°) were segmented with a deep-learning pipeline and standardized in a pointwise manner with age-adjusted normal data (z scores). Outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor inner segment (IS), and outer segment (OS) thickness were quantified along evenly spaced contour lines surrounding GA lesions. Linear mixed models were applied to assess the association between photoreceptor-related imaging features and GA progression rates and characterize the pattern of photoreceptor degeneration over time. Main Outcomes and Measures: Association of ONL thinning with follow-up time (after adjusting for age, retinal topography [z score], and distance to the GA boundary). Results: The study included 158 eyes of 89 patients (51 women and 38 men) with a mean (SD) age of 77.7 (7.1) years. The fully automated B-scan segmentation was accurate (dice coefficient, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.80-0.85; compared with manual markings) and revealed a marked interpatient variability in photoreceptor degeneration. The ellipsoid zone (EZ) loss-to-GA boundary distance and OS thickness were prognostic for future progression rates. Outer nuclear layer and IS thinning over time was significant even when adjusting for age and proximity to the GA boundary (estimates of -0.16 μm/y; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.02; and -0.17 μm/y; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.09). Conclusions and Relevance: Distinct and progressive alterations of photoreceptor laminae (exceeding GA spatially) were detectable and quantifiable. The degree of photoreceptor degeneration outside of regions of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy varied markedly between eyes and was associated with future GA progression. Macula-wide photoreceptor laminae thinning represents a potential candidate end point to monitor treatment effects beyond mere GA lesion size progression.
Authors: David Neely; Anna V Zarubina; Mark E Clark; Carrie E Huisingh; Gregory R Jackson; Yuhua Zhang; Gerald McGwin; Christine A Curcio; Cynthia Owsley Journal: Retina Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Lukas Goerdt; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Matthias M Mauschitz; Divyansh K Mishra; Frank G Holz; Moritz Lindner; Monika Fleckenstein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Moritz Lindner; Martin Gliem; Julia S Steinberg; Sarah Thiele; Robert P Finger; Monika Fleckenstein; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Annette Rasmussen; Sara B Bloch; Josefine Fuchs; Louise H Hansen; Michael Larsen; Morten LaCour; Henrik Lund-Andersen; Birgit Sander Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Renata Portella Nunes; Giovanni Gregori; Zohar Yehoshua; Paul F Stetson; William Feuer; Andrew A Moshfeghi; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Frank G Holz; Almut Bindewald-Wittich; Monika Fleckenstein; Jens Dreyhaupt; Hendrik P N Scholl; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Srinivas R Sadda; Robyn Guymer; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Christine A Curcio; Alan C Bird; Barbara A Blodi; Ferdinando Bottoni; Usha Chakravarthy; Emily Y Chew; Karl Csaky; Ronald P Danis; Monika Fleckenstein; K Bailey Freund; Juan Grunwald; Carel B Hoyng; Glenn J Jaffe; Sandra Liakopoulos; Jordi M Monés; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Philip J Rosenfeld; David Sarraf; Richard F Spaide; Ramin Tadayoni; Adnan Tufail; Sebastian Wolf; Giovanni Staurenghi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Brett G Jeffrey; Oliver J Flynn; Laryssa A Huryn; Maximilian Pfau; Catherine A Cukras Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 4.925
Authors: Antonio Yaghy; Aaron Y Lee; Pearse A Keane; Tiarnan D L Keenan; Luisa S M Mendonca; Cecilia S Lee; Anne Marie Cairns; Joseph Carroll; Hao Chen; Julie Clark; Catherine A Cukras; Luis de Sisternes; Amitha Domalpally; Mary K Durbin; Kerry E Goetz; Felix Grassmann; Jonathan L Haines; Naoto Honda; Zhihong Jewel Hu; Christopher Mody; Luz D Orozco; Cynthia Owsley; Stephen Poor; Charles Reisman; Ramiro Ribeiro; Srinivas R Sadda; Sobha Sivaprasad; Giovanni Staurenghi; Daniel Sw Ting; Santa J Tumminia; Luca Zalunardo; Nadia K Waheed Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.770
Authors: Manuela Völkner; Felix Wagner; Lisa Maria Steinheuer; Madalena Carido; Thomas Kurth; Ali Yazbeck; Jana Schor; Stephanie Wieneke; Lynn J A Ebner; Claudia Del Toro Runzer; David Taborsky; Katja Zoschke; Marlen Vogt; Sebastian Canzler; Andreas Hermann; Shahryar Khattak; Jörg Hackermüller; Mike O Karl Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-10-19 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Catherine A Cukras; Laryssa A Huryn; Wadih M Zein; Ehsan Ullah; Marisa P Boyle; Amy Turriff; Michelle A Chen; Aarti S Hinduja; Hermann Ea Siebel; Robert B Hufnagel; Brett G Jeffrey; Brian P Brooks Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2022-01-25
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Elon H C van Dijk; Thomas J van Rijssen; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Frank G Holz; Monika Fleckenstein; Camiel J F Boon Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marlene Saßmannshausen; Charlotte Behning; Ben Isselmann; Matthias Schmid; Robert P Finger; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Maximilian Pfau; Sarah Thiele Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Zengping Liu; Tanja Ilmarinen; Heli Skottman; Boris V Stanzel; Gavin S W Tan; Heidi Hongisto; Edmund Y M Wong; Andrew S H Tsai; Sami Al-Nawaiseh; Graham E Holder; Xinyi Su; Veluchamy Amutha Barathi Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Soumya Sahu; Rawan Allozi Rupnow; Kathleen Romond; Desiree Millet; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Monika Fleckenstein; Jennifer I Lim; Luis de Sisternes; Theodore Leng; Daniel L Rubin; Joelle A Hallak Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.283