| Literature DB >> 31922698 |
Ching-Hsiung Liu1,2,3, Tzu-Chen Yeh3,4,5, Yen-Ying Kung2,6,7, Hung-Pin Tseng1, Ching-Ju Yang3,4, Tzu-Yi Hong3,4, Chou-Ming Cheng3, Jen-Lin Yang6,7, Ta-Peng Wu6, Jen-Chuen Hsieh3,4,8, Fang-Pey Chen2,6.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate the functional connectivity (FC) in nonacute sciatica and the neuronal correlation of acupuncture analgesia.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; default mode network; functional connectivity; magnetic resonance imaging; sciatica
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31922698 PMCID: PMC7010574 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Behav Impact factor: 2.708
Demographic data at baseline and after acupuncture modulation
| Characteristics | Before acupuncture ( | After acupuncture ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 6/6 | 6/6 | — |
| Age (years) | 61.42 ± 14.84 | — | — |
| Duration (months) | 20.75 ± 16.44 | — | — |
| Side (right/left) | 6/6 | — | |
| VAS | 5.42 ± 1.83 | 3.92 ± 1.83 | .032 |
| SBI | 11.83 ± 5.37 | 9.42 ± 4.10 | .287 |
| RDQS | 10.75 ± 4.85 | 7.17 ± 5.04 | .036 |
| WHOQOL‐BREF, total | 53.19 ± 9.48 | 52.68 ± 8.28 | .827 |
| Physical | 12.68 ± 2.54 | 13.34 ± 1.87 | .388 |
| Psychological | 13.17 ± 2.55 | 12.91 ± 2.07 | .651 |
| Social | 13.58 ± 3.09 | 12.83 ± 3.46 | .298 |
| Environmental | 13.67 ± 2.61 | 13.41 ± 1.92 | .660 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD and were compared using independent t test (continuous variables).
Abbreviations: RDQS, Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica; SBI, Sciatica Bothersomeness Index; VAS, visual analog scale; WHOQOL‐BREF, the World Health Organization Quality of Life in the Brief Edition.
p < .05; **p < .01.
Figure 1Behavior scales before and after acupuncture treatment. Acup, acupuncture; RDQS, Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica; SBI, Sciatica Bothersomeness Index; VAS, visual analog scale. *p < .05
Comparison of groups: Between‐ and within‐group differences in regional homogeneity
| Contrast | Region | BA | Size |
| Coordinate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Effect of sciatica (between groups) | |||||||
| HC > Pretreat | NS | ||||||
| Pretreat > HC | PCC | 23 | 450 | 9.94 | −9 | −42 | 30 |
| Effect of treatment | |||||||
| Between groups | |||||||
| Post‐treat > HC | Precentral gyri | 4 | 193 | 7.66 | 24 | −21 | 51 |
| HC > Post‐treat | NS | ||||||
| Within groups | |||||||
| Pretreat > Post‐treat | PCC/PCu | 23 | 381 | 5.21 | 3 | −54 | 21 |
| Post‐treat > Pretreat | NS | ||||||
Peak coordinates refer to Montreal Neurological Institute space. Significance was set at the uncorrected voxel level p = .005, followed by the family‐wise error‐corrected cluster level p = .05.
Abbreviations: BA, Brodmann area; HC, healthy control group; NS, nonsignificant; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; Post‐treat, group with sciatica after an acupuncture treatment; Pretreat, group with sciatica before acupuncture treatment.
Figure 2Statistic maps in ReHo analysis of between‐group and between‐phase comparisons. (a) Comparison of patient groups between the pretreated and post‐treated phases. Comparison of the post‐treated sciatica group with the healthy group, showing ReHo in PCC (b) and right precentral gyrus (marked with yellow circle) (c). HC, healthy control; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; Post‐treated, patients with sciatica after acupuncture treatment; PreCG, precentral gyrus; Pretreated, patients with sciatica before acupuncture treatment; ReHo, regional homogeneity. *Significant differences in between‐phase comparisons, **p < .01
Figure 3PCC‐seeded FC patterns in the sciatica and healthy groups. DMN of the sciatica group in the pretreated phase (a), post‐treated phase (b) and healthy group (c). Hypoconnectivity between PCC‐seeded FC and left PCu, dmPFC, and cerebellum of the sciatica group after an acupuncture treatment, compared with controls (d, e). Hyperconnectivity with bilateral insula (Ins, marked with a yellow circle in the right), right OFC (f), bilateral IPL (marked with a yellow circle in the right) (g), left dACC (h), and bilateral cerebellum (i). dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; DMN, default mode network; dmPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; FC, functional connectivity; Ins, insula; IPL, inferior parietal lobe; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PCu, precuneus
Analysis of effects of between‐group and within‐group differences in regional homogeneity (ReHo) seed‐based functional connectivity
| Contrast | Region | BA | Size |
| Coordinate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Right ReHo seed (3,−54,21) | |||||||
| Effect of sciatica (between groups) | |||||||
| HC > AC pre | NS | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AC pre > HC | NS | ||||||
| Effect of acupuncture treatment | |||||||
| Between groups | |||||||
| AC post > HC | Insula, right | 13 | 672 | 7.33 | 39 | 12 | 3 |
| Insula, left | 13 | 604 | 6.56 | −51 | 6 | 3 | |
| OFC, right | 10 | 268 | 5.27 | 30 | 51 | 6 | |
| IPL, left | 40 | 301 | 6.34 | −54 | −42 | 39 | |
| IPL, right | 40 | 217 | 6.18 | 48 | −33 | 33 | |
| dACC | 32 | 318 | 5.07 | 12 | 15 | 36 | |
| Cerebellum, fusiform, R | — | 165 | 5.83 | 39 | −57 | −21 | |
| Cerebellum, fusiform, L | — | 486 | 5.07 | −33 | −66 | −18 | |
| AC post < HC | PCu, left | 31 | 1,247 | 10.56 | −3 | −60 | 21 |
| dmPFC, left‐ | 9 | 763 | 5.00 | −15 | 54 | 39 | |
| Cerebellum, tonsil | — | 222 | 5.53 | 6 | −54 | −48 | |
| Within groups | |||||||
| AC pre > AC post | PCC/PCu, left | 23 | 234 | 5.69 | 0 | −30 | 27 |
| AC post > AC pre | NS | — | |||||
Peak coordinates refer to Montreal Neurological Institute space. The significance threshold was set at the uncorrected voxel level p = .005, followed by the family‐wise error‐corrected cluster level p = .05.
Abbreviations: AC, group of sciatica with acupuncture; dACC, dorsal anterior circulate cortex; dmPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; HC, group of healthy controls; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; NS, nonsignificant; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PCu, precuneus; post, post‐treatment; pre, pretreatment.
Figure 4Correlation between the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC)‐seeded functional connectivity (FC) and behaviors in different conditions of sciatica patients