| Literature DB >> 26511911 |
Xiaoyan Chen1, Rosa B Spaeth2, Sonya G Freeman3, Donna Moxley Scarborough4, Javeria A Hashmi5, Hsiao-Ying Wey6, Natalia Egorova7, Mark Vangel8,9, Jianren Mao10, Ajay D Wasan11, Robert R Edwards12, Randy L Gollub13,14, Jian Kong15,16.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Recent advances in brain imaging have contributed to our understanding of the neural activity associated with acupuncture treatment. In this study, we investigated functional connectivity across longitudinal acupuncture treatments in older patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Over a period of 4 weeks (six treatments), we collected resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans from 30 patients before and after their first, third and sixth treatments. Clinical outcome showed a significantly greater pain subscore on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (indicative of improvement) with verum acupuncture than with sham acupuncture. Independent component analysis (ICA) of the resting state fMRI data showed that the right frontoparietal network (rFPN) and the executive control network (ECN) showed enhanced functional connectivity (FC) with the rostral anterior cingulate cortex/medial prefrontal cortex, a key region in the descending pain modulatory system, in the verum groups as compared to the sham group after treatments. We also found that the rFPN connectivity with the left insula is (1) significantly associated with changes in KOOS pain score after treatments, and (2) significantly enhanced after verum acupuncture treatments as compared to sham treatment. Analysis of the acupuncture needle stimulation scan showed that compared with sham treatment, verum acupuncture activated the left operculum/insula, which also overlaps with findings observed in resting state analysis. Our results suggest that acupuncture may achieve its therapeutic effect on knee OA pain by modulating functional connectivity between the rFPN, ECN and the descending pain modulatory pathway. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01079390.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26511911 PMCID: PMC4625557 DOI: 10.1186/s12990-015-0071-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Pain ISSN: 1744-8069 Impact factor: 3.395
Demographics and characteristics at baseline, and clinical outcomes before and after longitudinal acupuncture treatments
| Mean ± SD | All | High dose | Low dose | Sham |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (F) | 30 (13) | 10 (2) | 10 (7) | 10 (4) |
| Age | 58 ± 8 | 60 ± 9 | 58 ± 8 | 54 ± 7 |
| Duration (treated knee, years)* | 11 ± 8 | 10 ± 7 | 6 ± 6 | 16 ± 8 |
| Pain | ||||
| Baseline | 56 ± 14 | 59 ± 13 | 53 ± 9 | 56 ± 19 |
| Post-treatment | 64 ± 14 | 70 ± 16 | 66 ± 11 | 56 ± 12 |
| Symptoms | ||||
| Baseline | 53 ± 16 | 57 ± 19 | 48 ± 11 | 54 ± 18 |
| Post-treatment | 58 ± 15 | 60 ± 20 | 58 ± 15 | 55 ± 11 |
| Adjusted daily living | ||||
| Baseline | 64 ± 15 | 66 ± 12 | 61 ± 14 | 64 ± 20 |
| Post-treatment | 72 ± 16 | 74 ± 18 | 76 ± 12 | 65 ± 15 |
| Function in sport | ||||
| Baseline | 30 ± 23 | 30 ± 18 | 31 ± 19† | 29 ± 31 |
| Post-treatment | 41 ± 26 | 49 ± 33 | 48 ± 18 | 28 ± 21 |
| Quality of life | ||||
| Baseline | 39 ± 15 | 42 ± 17 | 38 ± 14 | 36 ± 16 |
| Post-treatment | 38 ± 18 | 44 ± 20 | 41 ± 16 | 29 ± 17 |
Results reported as mean ± SD
Please note that greater score on the KOOS indicates improvement
* Significant main effect of group (high vs. low vs. sham)
†N = 9 (one subject missing KOOS sport subscale score)
Regions that show connectivity change with pre-acupuncture resting state network after longitudinal acupuncture treatment (pre-treatment 6—pre-treatment 1) comparing acupuncture to sham group
| Network | Group | Area | Z score | Peak coordinate (x, y, z) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right frontoparietal network | Acu > Sham | rACC/MPFC | 4.45 | 12, 36, −12 |
| Right parahippocampus | 3.58 | 32, 0, −18 | ||
| Right midinsula/precentralgyrus | 3.98 | 52, −2, 2 | ||
| Right sup temporal/right inf temporal gyrus | 4.15 | 38, 4, −34 | ||
| Right inferior frontal/mid frontal gyrus | 3.25 | 50, 32, −4 | ||
| Left midinsula | 4 | −24, 4, 6 | ||
| Left thalamus | 3.77 | −22, −18, 10 | ||
| Left claustrum/parahippocampus | 3.4 | −38, −12, −14 | ||
| Left sup temporal gyrus | 3.46 | −50, −6, 0 | ||
| Sham > Acu | None | |||
| Executive control network | Acu > Sham | rACC | 3.95 | 4, 32, 2 |
| Left MPFC | 3.4 | −16, 56, −8 | ||
| Left insula | 3.72 | −46, 2, 2 | ||
| Left inferior frontal gyrus | 3.33 | −42, 36, 6 | ||
| Sham > Acu | None | |||
| Somatosensory network | Acu > Sham | None | ||
| Sham > Acu | Dorsal ACC | 4.74 | −8, 18, 38 | |
| Bilateral sup frontal/left middle frontal/medial frontal gyrus | 3.6 | −20, 48, 42 | ||
Fig. 1Comparison of the pre-acupuncture scans in treatments 6 and 1. a Connectivity between the right frontoparietal network and the rACC increases more in the verum group than in the sham group. (X = 12) b Results in a controlled for age and duration of pain. c Executive control network showed stronger connectivity with rACC after treatment in the verum group than in the sham group. (X = 4) d Results in c controlled for age and duration of pain. e Sensory-motor network showed reduced connectivity with dACC after real acupuncture treatment compared with sham group. (X = −8) f Results in e controlled for age and duration of pain
Fig. 2a Shown in green: after treatment, the increase in functional connectivity between the rFPN and left insula/putamen positively correlated with the change in KOOS pain score. Shown in red: the verum group showed significant increase in connectivity between the rFPN and left insula/putamen compared to sham group. (X = −30) b Results in a after adjusting for age and duration of pain. The comparison between verum and sham shown in red were at a less conservative threshold of voxel-wise Z > 1.96 and a corrected cluster significance threshold of P < 0.05
Regions in which treatment-related changes in connectivity (pre-treatment 6–pre-treatment 1) were positively correlated with change in clinical KOOS pain (post–pre)
| Clinical outcome | ICA networks | Area | Z value | Peak coordinate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOOS change in pain | Right frontoparietal network | Left anterior insula | 4.06 | −34, 30, 8 |
| Left posterior insula/left posterior parietal operculum | 2.9 | −52, −32, 20 | ||
| Left putamen | 3.94 | −28, −10, −8 | ||
| Left superior temporal/left mid temporal gyrus | 4.02 | −50, −52, 20 | ||
| Left parahippocampus | 3.32 | −34, −32, −18 | ||
| Cerebellum | 4.39 | 18, −48, −38 | ||
| Executive control network | Right mid frontal gyrus | 3.99 | 38, 20, 32 | |
| Sensory-motor network | None | None | None |
Fig. 3Shown in green: during acupuncture needle stimulation, the left posterior parietal operculum showed more activation in the verum group than in the sham group. Shown in blue: after treatment, the change (increased) in connectivity between the right frontoparietal network and left posterior parietal operculum correlates with the change in KOOS pain in patients (Y = −34)
Fig. 4Hypothetical schematic illustration of the resting state functional connectivity modulated by acupuncture and its relevance to pain relief. Note that this diagram does not exhaustively describe all networks and brain regions involved in acupuncture analgesia but only summarizes the mechanisms likely relevant for the current study. Red indicates increased activation/connectivity; blue indicates decreased activation/connectivity. Verum acupuncture needle stimulation activated the operculum/insula, as suggested by the functional MRI analysis. The insula/operculum processes information about both the sensory component of pain (posterior insula), as well as cognitive-emotional aspects of pain (anterior insula) [101]. In its capacity as a nociceptive salience detection, affective and pain decision-making hub [102], it might (1) increase functional connectivity between the attention, cognitive control and appraisal networks (rFPN, ECN) and the rACC/MPFC, which is a key brain region for attention and descending pain modulation with a direct connection to the PAG [75], further inhibiting noxious input; (2) decrease functional connectivity between the SMN and dACC, representing reduced interaction between the sensory and affective components of pain processing, providing further relief from pain