Literature DB >> 31915866

[Participatory development of digital public health: tension between user perspectives and evidence].

Tina Jahnel1, Benjamin Schüz2.   

Abstract

Digital public health promises not only more comprehensive medical care, but also individual health promotion and support for positive lifestyle changes. Mobile digital health devices and services, also called mobile health (mHealth), play a key role in this. They include health-specific hardware and software applications such as smartphone apps and wearable technology for recording, monitoring, and evaluating specific health parameters. Although there is scientific evidence for the effectiveness of individual applications, most often applications are used for a relatively short amount of time. In order to achieve a higher acceptance and utilization rate, evidence is needed that is more practice oriented.This paper explains how participatory development approaches take into account the individual needs and preferences of users and can improve the quality and effectiveness of mHealth services. The sociodemographic characteristics of the target group as well as individual, social, linguistic, and cultural barriers should be considered. The wishes of users, for example personalization, transmission of real-time information, and transparency in terms of privacy should also be considered. In the co-design approach, users are therefore included directly in the product concept. However, the study situation is still limited and there are no methodical approaches.In order to increase the use of mHealth services in the future, participation processes should be systematized. In addition, a framework for classification and certification as well as procedures for promoting effective applications should be developed.

Keywords:  Codesign; Efficacy; Health apps; Individual preferences; mHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31915866     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-019-03082-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Robyn Whittaker; Hayden McRobbie; Chris Bullen; Anthony Rodgers; Yulong Gu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-10

2.  Motivational Factors for User Engagement with mHealth Apps.

Authors:  Ashenafi Zebene Woldaregay; David-Zacharie Issom; André Henriksen; Henna Marttila; Martin Mikalsen; Gerit Pfuhl; Keiichi Sato; Christian Lovis; Gunnar Hartvigsen
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2018

3.  Describing the Process of Adopting Nutrition and Fitness Apps: Behavior Stage Model Approach.

Authors:  Laura M König; Gudrun Sproesser; Harald T Schupp; Britta Renner
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 4.  'This really takes it out of you!' The senses and emotions in digital health practices of the elderly.

Authors:  Monika Urban
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2017-04-12

5.  The effectiveness of app-based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition-related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karoline Villinger; Deborah R Wahl; Heiner Boeing; Harald T Schupp; Britta Renner
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 6.  Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Peter Hajek; Lindsay F Stead; Robert West; Martin Jarvis; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Tim Lancaster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-20

7.  Is Participatory Design Associated with the Effectiveness of Serious Digital Games for Healthy Lifestyle Promotion? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ann DeSmet; Debbe Thompson; Tom Baranowski; Antonio Palmeira; Maïté Verloigne; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Mobile Health Apps to Facilitate Self-Care: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences.

Authors:  Kevin Anderson; Oksana Burford; Lynne Emmerton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Comparing and contrasting 'innovation platforms' with other forms of professional networks for strengthening primary healthcare systems for Indigenous Australians.

Authors:  Jodie Bailie; Frances Clare Cunningham; Roxanne Gwendalyn Bainbridge; Megan E Passey; Alison Frances Laycock; Ross Stewart Bailie; Sarah L Larkins; Jenny S M Brands; Shanthi Ramanathan; Seye Abimbola; David Peiris
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-05-17
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Mapping Digital Public Health Interventions Among Existing Digital Technologies and Internet-Based Interventions to Maintain and Improve Population Health in Practice: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Laura Maaß; Chen-Chia Pan; Merle Freye
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 2.  The dawn of digital public health in Europe: Implications for public health policy and practice.

Authors:  Brian Li Han Wong; Laura Maaß; Alice Vodden; Robin van Kessel; Sebastiano Sorbello; Stefan Buttigieg; Anna Odone
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.