Rebecca A Dorner1, Renee D Boss1,2, Vera Joanna Burton3,4, Katherine Raja5, Monica E Lemmon4,6,7. 1. Division of Perinatal-Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 7. Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To determine whether, and how, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parents want to receive early neurodevelopmental screening information about their child's future risk of cerebral palsy and other disabilities. METHOD: This was a qualitative interview study. Parents of hospitalized infants born preterm completed semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using a directed content analysis approach. RESULTS: Thematic saturation was achieved after 19 interviews. Four themes characterized parent perceptions of early neurodevelopmental screening: (1) acceptability: most parents were in favour of neurodevelopmental screening if parents could refuse; (2) disclosure of results: parents want emotional preparation for results, especially false positives; (3) emotional burden of uncertainty: parents of children in the NICU balance taking their infant's illness 'day by day' and preparing for an uncertain future. Parents expressed distress with screening that increased uncertainty about the future; and (4) disability: prior experience with disability informs parent concerns. INTERPRETATION: Parents interpret the risks and benefits of NICU developmental screening through the lens of prior experiences with disability. Most expressed interest in screening and emphasized a desire for autonomy, pretest counselling, and emotional preparation. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Most parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit expressed interest in early screening for developmental disability. Prior experience with disability informed concerns about specific deficits. Parents emphasized a desire for autonomy, pretest counselling, and emotional preparation.
AIM: To determine whether, and how, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parents want to receive early neurodevelopmental screening information about their child's future risk of cerebral palsy and other disabilities. METHOD: This was a qualitative interview study. Parents of hospitalized infants born preterm completed semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using a directed content analysis approach. RESULTS: Thematic saturation was achieved after 19 interviews. Four themes characterized parent perceptions of early neurodevelopmental screening: (1) acceptability: most parents were in favour of neurodevelopmental screening if parents could refuse; (2) disclosure of results: parents want emotional preparation for results, especially false positives; (3) emotional burden of uncertainty: parents of children in the NICU balance taking their infant's illness 'day by day' and preparing for an uncertain future. Parents expressed distress with screening that increased uncertainty about the future; and (4) disability: prior experience with disability informs parent concerns. INTERPRETATION: Parents interpret the risks and benefits of NICU developmental screening through the lens of prior experiences with disability. Most expressed interest in screening and emphasized a desire for autonomy, pretest counselling, and emotional preparation. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Most parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit expressed interest in early screening for developmental disability. Prior experience with disability informed concerns about specific deficits. Parents emphasized a desire for autonomy, pretest counselling, and emotional preparation.
Authors: Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Catherine Morgan; Johanna Darrah; Andrew M Gordon; Regina Harbourne; Alicia Spittle; Robert Johnson; Linda Fetters Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Monica E Lemmon; Pamela K Donohue; Erin P Williams; Debra Brandon; Peter A Ubel; Renee D Boss Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Stacey C Dusing; Tanya Tripathi; Emily C Marcinowski; Leroy R Thacker; Lisa F Brown; Karen D Hendricks-Muñoz Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Monica E Lemmon; Courtney J Wusthoff; Renee D Boss; Lisa Anne Rasmussen Journal: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 3.726