Third-Generation TKI Resistance Due to SCLC Transformation: A Case Report and Brief Review.

OBJECTIVE: We reported a case of pathologic type transformed from adenocarcinoma to small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after being treated with third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lung cancer pathologic type was transformed from adenocarcinoma to SCLC after the treatment of third-generation EGFR-TKI for 4.3 months. Four times of lung biopsies were conducted at a different time and different lesions. And the patient was treated with a variety of regimens after SCLC transformation, including etoposide combined with carboplatin (EC), irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin (IO), Abraxane, and Apatinib. These treatments got a good response, but quick progression. We also monitored the dynamic change of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and pro-gastrin releasing peptide (Pro-GRP).
RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma could transform into SCLC after the treatment of TKI. Tumor cells were heterogeneity, so adenocarcinoma and SCLC could be co-existed. The fluctuation of the NSE was consistent with the response of treatment and the progression of the tumor.
CONCLUSION: Regimens for the primary SCLC were also available for the transformed SCLC, but the duration of the response was short. NSE could be an effective biomarker for dynamic monitoring of the efficacy in SCLC transformation.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the most common cancer type. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been recognized as a remarkable driver gene in lung adenocarcinoma. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have achieved significant effects in EGFR-positive mutant lung cancer. Normally, acquired resistance invariably happened in about 1 year after EGFR-TKIs.1 The secondary T790M mutation plays a key role in up to 50% first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance cases.2 Third-generation EGFR-TKI is a powerful drug against these cases.3 Unfortunately，drug resistance is also inevitable. The mechanisms are not entirely clear. One mechanism is the transformation of adenocarcinoma to SCLC.4 The incidence of SCLC transformation is low.

Here, we reported a case of third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance due to SCLC transformation.

Case Presentation

A 49-year-old man with no smoking history detected a lesion in left lower lobe lung by X-ray during an annual checkup on 8th May 2013. A curative operation was performed in Shanghai pulmonary hospital on third Jun 2013. The laboratory findings were normal, including the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)，neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and pro-gastrin releasing peptide (Pro-GRP). Pathological findings were as follows, the tumor was 4.5cm×3cm×3.2cm, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Figure 1A), 6th and 11th hilar mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis and EGFR exon 21 L858R mutant.

Figure 1

The change of pathological morphology. (A) Jun 2013, postoperative specimens: moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. (B) Aug 2015, resistant to gefitinib: moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. (C) Jan 2016, resistant to AZD9291: poorly differentiated carcinoma. (D) Oct 2016, lesion A resistant to EC/IO, SCLC. (E) Oct 2016, lesion B resistant to EC/IO, LADC. (F) April 2017, enlarged lesion of right lung after apatinib, NSCLC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel combined with cisplatin was conducted for 4 cycles after the surgery. The patient refused adjuvant radiotherapy. The disease was relapsed and metastasized on 5th Jan 2014. CT scans showed multiple tiny nodules distributed in both lungs. He started to receive first-generation EGFR-TKI (gefitinib). The disease was progressed on 5th May 2015. A ct-guided needle biopsy was conducted to the lesion of the right lung. The result showed adenocarcinoma (Figure 1B) with EGFR L858R and T790M mutant. Followed with 2 cycles of chemotherapy of pemetrexed combination with cisplatin，disease was progression on 2nd Aug 2015. Then, third-generation EGFR-TKI (osimertinib) was administered on 17th Sep 2015. The best efficacy evaluation was a partial response (PR). He got a progression disease (PD) on 27th Jan 2016. We conducted a CT-guided needle aspiration in the enlarged lesion in his right lung (Figure 2A).

Figure 2

Four times CT-guide needle biopsy. (A) Jan 2016, CT-guided needle biopsy in the enlarged lesion in his right lung. (B) Oct 2016, CT-guided needle biopsy in lesion A after resistant to IO. (C) Oct 2016, CT-guided needle biopsy in lesion B after resistant to IO. (D) Apr 2017, CT-guided needle biopsy in the enlarged lesion of right lung after apatinib.

Pathology (29th Jan 2016) showed poorly differentiated carcinoma, SCLC according to immunohistochemistry (Napsin A -, TTF 1 +, Syn +) (Figures 1C and 3A). NSE was elevated (38.48ng/mL, normal value range: 0–20ng/mL) (Figure 4). Etoposide combined with carboplatin (EC) was administered. CT scan showed a remarkable shrinkage of the tumor. Response evaluation was PR (after 2 cycles) (Figure 5A). The response evaluation of 4 cycles was PD (Figure 5B). NSE was elevated to 45.35ng/mL (Figure 4). We replaced the EC regimen to irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin (IO)，and got PR after 2 cycles (Figure 5C). NSE was decreased to the normal range (18.17ng/mL) (Figure 4). The disease was progressed after 4 cycles on 19th Oct 2018 (Figure 5D). NSE was increased to 52.90ng/mL (Figure 4).

Figure 3

The change of Immunohistochemistry. (A) Jan 2016, resistant to AZD9291, indicated SCLC (IHC: NapsinA−, TTF1+, Syn+). (B) Oct 2016, lesion A after resistant to IO, indicated SCLC (IHC: NapsinA-，TTF-1+, Syn-, CD56+). (C) Oct 2016, lesion B after reistance to IO, indicated adenocarcinoma (IHC: NapsinA+,TTF-1+).

Figure 4

Fluctuation of serum NSE and pro-GRP. (A) The fluctuation of serum NSE (12.26 ng/mL at baseline, 38.48 ng/mL, at the time of resistant to AZD9291,45.35 ng/mL at time of resistant to EC after 4 cycles, 17.71 ng/mL at time of response to IO after 2 cycles, 52.9 ng/mL at time of resistant to IO after 4 cycles, 18.17 ng/mL at time of response to abraxane after 4 cycles, 25.09 ng/mL at time of resistant to abraxane after 4 cycles,18.93 ng/mL at time of treatment of apatinib after 6 weeks). (B) The fluctuation of serum pro-GRP (22.35 pg/mL at time of response to IO after 2 cycle, 27.94 pg/mL at time of resistant to IO after 4 cycles, 21.05 pg/mL at time of response to abraxane after 4 cycles, 17.79 pg/mL at time of resistant to abraxane after 4 cycles, 18.94 pg/mL at time of treatment of apatinib after 6 weeks).

Figure 5

The change of chest CT after different regimens. (A) PR after 2 cycles of EC (right lower lobe, from 6.71 to 3.1 cm). (B) PD after 4 cycles of EC (right lower lobe, from 2.9 to 3.9 cm). (C) PR after 2 cycles of IO (left upper lobe, from 2.72 to 1.65 cm). (D) PD after 4 cycles of IO (left upper lobe, from 1.9 to 3.1cm). (E) PR after 2 cycles of Abraxane (right lower lobe, from 5.41 to 0.4 cm). (F) PD after 4 cycles of Abraxane (right upper lobe，from 2.8 to 4.0 cm). (G) Shrunken lesion of left lung after Apatinib (left lower lobe，from 3.47 to 2.34 cm). (H) Enlarged lesion at right lung after Apatinib (right upper lobe，from 3.74 to 5.73 cm).

We conducted a CT-guided needle biopsy in two different sites (Figure 2B and C). Interestingly, the result showed that one was SCLC (IHC: Napsin A−, TTF-1+, Syn−, CD 56+) (Figures 1D and 3B), and the other was lung adenocarcinoma (IHC: Napsin A+, TTF-1+) (Figures 1E and 3C).

Abraxane was administered to the subjects after the IO regimen failed and obtained an inspiring efficacy, most lesions exhibited shrinkage (Figure 5E). NSE was returned to the normal value (18.17ng/mL) (Figure 4). Unfortunately, the duration of the response was short. Lesions were enlarged after 4 cycles of Abraxane. Chest CT showed disease progression again (Figure 5F). NSE was raised to 25.09ng/mL (Figure 4). Apatinib, a type of small molecule vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs), was administered to the patient. Amusingly, one month later, nearly all lesions were shrunk (Figure 5G), while one solitary lesion at the right lung was enlarged (Figure 5H). We conducted a CT-guided needle puncture in the enlarged lesion of the right lung (Figure 2D). The pathological type turned out to be NSCLC (Figure 1F). NSE was 18.93ng/mL (Figure 4).

As the performance status (PS) score was 2, the patient received the best support care (BSC). He died of respiratory failure on 11th July 2017 (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Multiple treatment regimens.

Abbreviations: TP, docetaxel combined with cisplatin. AP, pemetrexed combination with cisplatin. EC, Etoposide combined with carboplatin. IO, irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin. BSC, best support care. ADC, adenocarcinoma. SCLC, small- cell lung cancer.

Discussion

EGFR-TKIs achieved remarkable efficacy in clinical practice and was recognized as standard first-line therapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR sensitive mutation worldwide.5,6 Acquired resistance to TKI was an annoying problem.7 T790M mutation occurred in nearly half of cases when patients were resistant to the first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib was the standard therapy for NSCLC patients with T790M mutation.3 There were 3 resistant types of osimertinib: both the initial EGFR sensitive and T790M mutation were disappeared; EGFR sensitive mutation could be detected, but T790M mutation was disappeared; both the initial sensitive mutation and T790M mutation existed. The mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib were various, including acquired C797S mutation, SCLC transformation, c-MET amplification, HER-2 amplification, BRAF mutation, KRAS mutation, and PI3KCA mutation, etc. The patient, we presented, harbored the first-generation EGFR-TKI as L858R and T790M mutation, who was resistant to the third-generation EGFR-TKI because of SCLC transformation. It was reported that lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations were more likely to get SCLC transformation than EGFR-wild type patients.8 The median time of SCLC transformation was 17.8 months (14.3 to 26.2 months),4 while the time was 30.7 months in our case (from third Jun 2013 to 29th Jan 2016). In this case, the progression-free survival (PFS) of the first-generation EGFR-TKI was 17.5 months (from 16th Jan 2014 to 30th Jun 2015), while the third-generation EGFR-TKI was administered for about 4.3 months (from 16th Sep 2015 to 24 Jan 2016). The resistance mechanism was probably an SCLC transformation during osimertinib therapy in this patient.

It was reported that SCLC transformation had a high incidence of never smoking, young, EGFR-positive mutant NSCLC patients.9 EC was the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen after transformation SCLC, it was reported that the estimated PFS was 3.4 months (2.4–5.4 months).4 The PFS was 3.8 months in our case (from third Feb 2016 to 26th May 2016)，which was consistent with the published data. Furthermore, we presented the patient who has also accepted some available regimens, such as Abraxane and Apatinib. The efficacy as well, but the duration of the response was short.

Serum NSE and pro-GRP were commonly recommended as a tumor biomarker for SCLC. Huang reported that pro-GRP and NSE were accurate biomarkers in evaluating response to the regimen and predicting the prognosis in patients with SCLC.10 Cavalieri reported that pro-GRP was available biomarker in the SCLC and sensitive for SCLC diagnosis at cutoff value of 77.8pg/L.11 Zhang reported that NSE increased 5-folds when adenocarcinoma transformed to SCLC. The result suggests that increased NSE levels may point to pathological transformation.12 Akira suggests that pro-GRP shows a higher correlation to tumor reopens than NSE in primary SCLC.13 However, there were seldom references discuss the pro-GRP in transformed SCLC.

In our case, we observed the different fluctuations between them (Figure 4). Both NSE and pro-GRP were normal at the time of diagnosis. NSE showed a rapid increase on 6th Feb 2016, when the pathology was transformed to SCLC. The fluctuation of the NSE was consistent with the response of the treatment and the progression of the tumor. NSE could be an available and effective biomarker for transformation SCLC (Figure 4A). Pro-GRP was in a normal range during the whole course of the disease (Figure 4B). So we speculated that SCLC transformation had the potential difference from primary SCLC. More research should be done in the transformation SCLC.

Multiple treatment regimens were applied to this patient (Figure 6). EC therapy was the standard regimen of SCLC.14 In this case, the tumor had a moderate response after 2 cycles of treatment (Figure 5A)，but it progressed after 4 cycles of treatment (Figure 5B). The duration of response was significantly shorter than that in primary SCLC. Similarly, the situation happened with irinotecan treatment (Figure 5C and D). Efficacy in SCLC transformation patients was poorer than that in primary SCLC patients.15 It was reported that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy was effective in SCLC in first-line treatment.16,17 In our case, we found apatinib was available in patients with SCLC transformation (Figure 5E).

We also observed that the response among different lesions was different. We conducted needle biopsy in different lesions (Figure 2B and C), the pathology results of 2 lesions were different: one was SCLC (Figures 1D and 3B), and the other was adenocarcinoma (Figures 1E and 3C). SCLC and adenocarcinoma co-existed simultaneously. This was an interesting phenomenon. Lung adenocarcinoma and SCLC might exist at initial tumor lesions. Then, the proportion of lung adenocarcinoma cells decreased due to the EGFR-TKI treatment and the proportion of SCLC cells was increased.8 Re-biopsy and multiple lesions biopsy were important, especially when the efficacy was not good or different lesions presented discordant response. In this case, we conducted a lung biopsy of the right lung at enlarged lesion during the administered of Apatinib on 20th Apr 2017 (Figure 2D), and the lesion turned out to be NSCLC (Figure 1F). It might be related to the heterogeneity of the cancer cells.18

Previously report showed that activated retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) and tumor protein p53 (TP53) were correlated with EGFR-TKI resistant SCLC. RB1 losing was observed in 100% of SCLC transformed cases.19 NSCLC patients presenting with TP53 and RB1 mutations at baseline are more likely to transform to SCLC.20 A hypothesis was that the transformed SCLC was evolved from adenocarcinoma or developed from the common precursor as adenocarcinoma. It was believed that EGFR mutation could promote phenotypic changing.9 TKI might activate the pluripotent cells or induce specific differentiation. The pathological change occurred more frequently under the selective pressure of TKI. Studies have revealed that the alveolar type II cells might be a common precursor of both lung adenocarcinoma and SCLC cells.8 EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells which evolved from alveolar type II cells might have the potential to transform into SCLC.

Additionally, the pathological transformation was existed not only in EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients but also detected in a patient treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-TKI. The phenomenon was reported in patients treated with Crizotinib or Alectinib. It was also suggested that SCLC transformation was not unique in patients treated with TKI. Two cases of lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-wild-type were reported.21 What’s more? An EGFR-wild-type NSCLC patient transformed from NSCLC to SCLC during nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody) was reported recently.22 The mechanisms of SCLC transformation were not clear. More research was needed to reveal the mechanisms. And the transformation SCLC shared the different characteristics with the primary SCLC, in the aspect of the tumor biomarkers, the effect of traditional treatment regimen and response. The changes in the level of blood tumor biomarkers, particularly for NSE in serum, might suggest the pathological transformation occurred; re-biopsy or multiple lesion biopsies were needed.