| Literature DB >> 31905694 |
Zhulin Xue1, Nan Liu1, Yanlu Wang2, Hongjian Yang2, Yuqi Wei1, Philipe Moriel3, Elizabeth Palmer3, Yingjun Zhang1.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of different forage ratios of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) on in vitro rumen degradation and fermentation characteristics. Orchardgrass and alfalfa were harvested separately and prepared as hay and silage mixtures at ratios of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100 (w/w on a dry matter basis) and anaerobically incubated for 48 h with rumen fluid obtained from lactating dairy cows. Fermented residues and cultured fluids were used to determine nutrient degradability, fermentation parameters, and associative effect indices. Increasing the proportion of alfalfa in hay and silage mixtures quadratically increased in vitro organic matter disappearance (IVOMD, up +5.14%) and marginally decreased in vitro neutral detergent fiber disappearance (NDFD, down -1.79%). Meanwhile, increasing the proportion of alfalfa accelerated the rumen fermentation process (e.g., gas production) and remarkably enhanced the growth of rumen microbes as indicated by microbial protein production (MCP, 13.4% increase). Increments of rumen degradability and methane production were more pronounced in silage mixtures than hay mixtures. In combination, a forage ratio of 50:50 for orchardgrass and alfalfa is recommended for both hay and silage in order to improve the feed use potential in ruminants.Entities:
Keywords: forage quality; gas production; methane; ruminant
Year: 2019 PMID: 31905694 PMCID: PMC7022912 DOI: 10.3390/ani10010059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Chemical composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa prior to hay making and ensiling based on dry matter (g/kg).
| Item | Orchardgrass | Alfalfa |
|---|---|---|
| Dry matter | 260 | 268 |
| Crude protein | 167 | 214 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 562 | 484 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 424 | 385 |
| Acid detergent lignin | 37.0 | 72.2 |
| Ash | 111 | 92.0 |
| Ether extract | 26.8 | 24.0 |
| Calcium | 7.04 | 14.1 |
| Phosphorus | 3.42 | 3.36 |
| Potassium | 33.6 | 27.8 |
| Magnesium | 3.72 | 3.16 |
Figure 1Chemical composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa mixtures preserved as hay and silage: (a) crude protein; (b) neutral detergent fiber; (c) acid detergent fiber; (d) acid detergent lignin; (e) ash; (f) calcium; (g) potassium; (h) magnesium; (i) ether extract; (j) total digestible nutrients; (k) dry matter intake; (l) relative forage quality.
Ensiling characteristics of orchardgrass and alfalfa silage mixtures.
| Item | Forage Ratios of Orchardgrass to Alfalfa | SEM 2 |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100:0 | 75:25 | 50:50 | 25:75 | 0:100 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| pH | 4.50 | 4.83 | 4.75 | 5.03 | 4.96 | 0.049 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Ammonia N (mmol/L) | 5.36 | 7.96 | 9.96 | 11.2 | 11.1 | 0.585 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Lactic acid (mmol/L) | 963 | 998 | 969 | 754 | 608 | 50.7 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Acetic acid (mmol/L) | 1.58 | 2.55 | 7.54 | 7.88 | 8.63 | 0.860 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Propionic acid (mmol/L) | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.023 | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Butyric acid (mmol/L) | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.008 | 0.081 | 0.159 |
| Flieg’s score 1 | 95.6 | 89.2 | 87.6 | 79.3 | 76.8 | 1.67 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Single-factor associative effects indices (%) of ensiling characteristics 4 | ||||||||
| pH | - | 4.6 | 0.5 | 3.8 | - | 0.76 | ||
| Ammonia N (mmol/L) | - | 17.0 | 20.6 | 15.4 | - | 4.09 | ||
| Lactic acid (mmol/L) | - | 14.2 | 23.4 | 8.2 | - | 5.76 | ||
| Acetic acid (mmol/L) | - | −23.7 | 12.8 | 14.8 | - | 10.2 | ||
| Propionic acid (mmol/L) | - | −6.4 | 11.0 | 51.1 | - | 11.93 | ||
1 Flieg’s score was calculated by means of the pH values and DM contents of the silages: Flieg’s score = 220 + (2 × % DM − 15) − 40 × pH. Flieg’s score: < 20, very bad; 21–40, bad; 41–60, medium; 61–80, good; 81–100, very good. Since there was no difference on DM contents (ranging from 376 g/kg to 383 g/kg) among silage mixtures, the data were not shown. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean. 3 Linear and quadratic represent the effects of alfalfa inclusion on different silage mixtures. 4 Single-factor associative effects indices (SFAEI, %) = 100 × [(observed value − calculated value)/calculated value]. Calculated value was determined based on the proportional contribution of sole forage (orchardgrass vs. alfalfa) in the silage mixture. Positive or negative values indicated positive or negative associative effects of orchardgrass and alfalfa mixtures.
Figure 2In vitro degradation characteristics of orchardgrass and alfalfa mixtures preserved as hay and silage: (a) IVDMD, in vitro dry matter disappearance; (b) IVOMD, in vitro organic matter disappearance; (c) NDFD, in vitro neutral detergent fiber disappearance; (d) ADFD, in vitro acid detergent fiber disappearance. The preservation method indicates whether the forage was preserved as hay or silage, and the interaction indicates the interaction between the preservation method and the ratio of orchardgrass to alfalfa. Orthogonal contrasts were used to examine the linear and quadratic effects of alfalfa inclusion on different hay and silage mixtures. Bars show the mean ± standard error.
Gas production kinetics of orchardgrass and alfalfa mixtures preserved as hay and silage.
| Item 1 | Preservation Method | Forage Ratios of Orchardgrass to Alfalfa | SEM 2 |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100:0 | 75:25 | 50:50 | 25:75 | 0:100 | Preservation Method | Linear | Quadratic | |||
| GP48 (mL/g DM) | Hay | 122 | 128 | 133 | 134 | 131 | 1.1 | 0.847 | <0.001 | 0.026 |
| GP kinetics | ||||||||||
| A (mL/g DM) | Hay | 123 | 128 | 134 | 135 | 131 | 1.1 | 0.837 | <0.001 | 0.025 |
| c | Hay | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.002 | 0.165 | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Half-time (h) | Hay | 2.71 | 2.69 | 2.55 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 0.012 | 0.339 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| AGPR (mL/h) | Hay | 23.4 | 25.1 | 28.4 | 29.2 | 29.8 | 0.37 | 0.319 | <0.001 | 0.025 |
| Fermentation gas pattern (mL/g OM digested) | ||||||||||
| CO2 | Hay | 174 | 176 | 178 | 180 | 176 | 0.8 | 0.081 | 0.150 | 0.675 |
| CH4 | Hay | 31.6 | 34.5 | 36.2 | 36.4 | 37.1 | 0.62 | 0.045 | 0.006 | 0.287 |
| H2 | Hay | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 1.51 | 0.121 | 0.476 | 0.513 | 0.164 |
1 GP48, cumulative gas production at 48 h; A, asymptotic gas production; c, fractional rate of the gas production of ‘A’; half-time, the time when ‘A’ reached its half-maximal value; AGPR, average gas production rate when half of ‘A’ occurred. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean. 3 The preservation method indicates whether the forage was preserved as hay or silage. Linear and quadratic represent the effects of alfalfa inclusion in the different hay and silage mixtures. Since there were no interactions between the preservation method and the ratios of orchardgrass to alfalfa, we did not present p-values on interaction in the Table 3.
Fermentation characteristics of orchardgrass and alfalfa mixtures preserved as hay and silage.
| Item 1 | Preservation Method | Forage Ratios of Orchardgrass to Alfalfa | SEM 2 |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100:0 | 75:25 | 50:50 | 25:75 | 0:100 | Preservation method | Linear | Quadratic | |||
| Ammonia N (mg/dL) | Hay | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.4 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 0.31 | 0.635 | 0.029 | 0.996 |
| MCP (μg/mL) | Hay | 270 | 276 | 329 | 345 | 338 | 5.2 | 0.555 | <0.001 | 0.034 |
| Total VFAs (mmol/L) | Hay | 110 | 116 | 118 | 117 | 120 | 1.2 | 0.208 | 0.049 | 0.688 |
| VFA pattern (mmol/L) | ||||||||||
| Acetate | Hay | 71.2 | 76.6 | 78.4 | 77.4 | 77.8 | 1.10 | 0.085 | 0.309 | 0.809 |
| Propionate | Hay | 18.8 | 17.6 | 17.4 | 18.9 | 19.0 | 0.17 | 0.297 | 0.136 | 0.631 |
| Butyrate | Hay | 9.09 | 9.76 | 9.51 | 9.33 | 10.2 | 0.31 | 0.620 | 0.300 | 0.887 |
| Isobutyrate | Hay | 2.14 | 2.63 | 2.56 | 2.14 | 2.20 | 0.084 | 0.257 | 0.900 | 0.811 |
| Valerate | Hay | 2.61 | 3.02 | 3.10 | 2.81 | 3.50 | 0.093 | 0.801 | 0.015 | 0.710 |
| Isovalerate | Hay | 6.04 | 6.20 | 6.68 | 6.54 | 7.16 | 0.185 | 0.097 | 0.024 | 0.704 |
1 Ammonia N, ammonia nitrogen; MCP, microbial protein production; VFAs, volatile fatty acids. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean. 3 The preservation method indicates whether the forage was preserved as hay or silage. Linear and quadratic represent the effects of alfalfa inclusion in different hay and silage mixtures. Since there were no interactions between the preservation method and the ratios of orchardgrass to alfalfa, we did not present p-values on interaction in the Table 4.
Figure 3Single-factor associative effects indices (SFAEI, %) and multiple-factors associative effects indices (MFAEI, %) of hay and silage mixtures. RFQ, relative forage quality; IVOMD, in vitro dry matter disappearance; NDFD, in vitro neutral detergent fiber disappearance; c, gas production rate; GP48, gas production at 48 h; MCP, microbial protein production. Bars show the mean ± standard error. Single-factor associative effects indices (SFAEI, %) = 100 × [(observed value − calculated value)/calculated value]. Calculated value was determined based on the proportional contribution of sole forage (orchardgrass vs. alfalfa) in the mixture. Positive or negative values indicated positive or negative associative effects of orchardgrass and alfalfa mixtures.