Literature DB >> 27692708

Characterization and comparison of the temporal dynamics of ruminal bacterial microbiota colonizing rice straw and alfalfa hay within ruminants.

Junhua Liu1, Mengling Zhang1, Chunxu Xue1, Weiyun Zhu1, Shengyong Mao2.   

Abstract

Three ruminally cannulated Holstein cows were used to characterize the dynamics of bacterial colonization of rice straw and alfalfa hay and to assess the differences in the composition and inferred gene function of the colonized microbiota between these 2 forages. Nonincubated (0h) rice straw and alfalfa hay samples and residues in nylon bags incubated for 0.5, 2, 6, 16, and 48h were analyzed for dry matter and were used for DNA extraction and MiSeq (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbial communities that colonized the air-dried and nonincubated (0h) rice straw and alfalfa hay were both dominated by members of the Proteobacteria (contributing toward 70.47% of the 16S RNA reads generated). In situ incubation of the 2 forages revealed major shifts in the community composition: Proteobacteria were replaced within 30min by members belonging to the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, contributing toward 51.9 and 36.6% of the 16S rRNA reads generated, respectively. A second significant shift was observed after 6h of rumen incubation, when members of the Spirochaetes and Fibrobacteria phyla became abundant in the forage-adherent community. During the first 30min of rumen incubation, ~20.7 and 36.1% of the rice straw and alfalfa hay, respectively, were degraded, whereas little biomass degradation occurred between 30min and 2h after the rice straw or alfalfa hay was placed in the rumen. Significant differences were noted in attached bacterial community structure between the 2 forage groups, and the abundances of dominant genera Anaeroplasma, Butyrivibrio, Fibrobacter, and Prevotella were affected by the forage types. Real-time PCR results showed that the 16S rRNA copies of total bacteria attached to these 2 forages were affected by the forage types and incubation time, and higher numbers of attached bacterial 16S rRNA were observed in the alfalfa hay samples than in the rice straw from 0.5 to 16h of incubation. The metagenomes predicted by phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) revealed that the forage types significantly affected 21 metabolic pathways identified in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and 33 were significantly changed over time. Collectively, our results reveal a difference in the dynamics of bacterial colonization and the inferred gene function of microbiota associated with rice straw and alfalfa hay within the rumen. These findings are of great importance for the targeted improvement of forage nutrient use efficiency in ruminants.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alfalfa hay; microbiome; rice straw; rumen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692708     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  33 in total

Review 1.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Effect of ammonia fiber expansion-treated wheat straw and a recombinant fibrolytic enzyme on rumen microbiota and fermentation parameters, total tract digestibility, and performance of lambs.

Authors:  Gabriel O Ribeiro; Robert J Gruninger; Darryl R Jones; Karen A Beauchemin; Wen Zhu Yang; Yuxi Wang; D Wade Abbott; Adrian Tsang; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Metagenomic analysis reveals a dynamic microbiome with diversified adaptive functions to utilize high lignocellulosic forages in the cattle rumen.

Authors:  Javad Gharechahi; Mohammad Farhad Vahidi; Mohammad Bahram; Jian-Lin Han; Xue-Zhi Ding; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Characteristics of various fibrolytic isozyme activities in the rumen microbial communities of Japanese Black and Holstein Friesian cattle under different conditions.

Authors:  Shuhei Takizawa; Ryoki Asano; Yasuhiro Fukuda; Yasunori Baba; Chika Tada; Yutaka Nakai
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.974

Review 5.  Metagenomic investigation of gastrointestinal microbiome in cattle.

Authors:  Minseok Kim; Tansol Park; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Progressive Colonization of Bacteria and Degradation of Rice Straw in the Rumen by Illumina Sequencing.

Authors:  Yanfen Cheng; Ying Wang; Yuanfei Li; Yipeng Zhang; Tianyi Liu; Yu Wang; Thomas J Sharpton; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  In situ rumen degradation characteristics and bacterial colonization of whole cottonseed, cottonseed hull and cottonseed meal with different gossypol content.

Authors:  Wei-Kang Wang; Yan-Lu Wang; Wen-Juan Li; Qi-Chao Wu; Kai-Lun Yang; Sheng-Li Li; Hong-Jian Yang
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Monensin and Nisin Affect Rumen Fermentation and Microbiota Differently In Vitro.

Authors:  Junshi Shen; Zhuang Liu; Zhongtang Yu; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effect of Limit-Fed Diets With Different Forage to Concentrate Ratios on Fecal Bacterial and Archaeal Community Composition in Holstein Heifers.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Haitao Shi; Yajing Wang; Zhijun Cao; Hongjian Yang; Shengli Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Persistence of Cellulolytic Bacteria Fibrobacter and Treponema After Short-Term Corn Stover-Based Dietary Intervention Reveals the Potential to Improve Rumen Fibrolytic Function.

Authors:  Xiao Xie; Chunlei Yang; Le L Guan; Jiakun Wang; Mingyuan Xue; Jian X Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.