Literature DB >> 31903444

Treatment Outcome Prediction for Cancer Patients based on Radiomics and Belief Function Theory.

Jian Wu1, Chunfeng Lian2, Su Ruan2, Thomas R Mazur1, Sasa Mutic1, Mark A Anastasio3, Perry W Grigsby1, Pierre Vera2, Hua Li1.   

Abstract

In this study, we proposed a new radiomics-based treatment outcome prediction model for cancer patients. The prediction model is developed based on belief function theory (BFT) and sparsity learning to address the challenges of redundancy, heterogeneity, and uncertainty of radiomic features, and relatively small-sized and unbalanced training samples. The model first selects the most predictive feature subsets from relatively large amounts of radiomic features extracted from pre- and/or in-treatment positron emission tomography (PET) images and available clinical and demographic features. Then an evidential k-nearest neighbor (EK-NN) classifier is proposed to utilize the selected features for treatment outcome prediction. Twenty-five stage II-III lung, 36 esophagus, 63 stage II-III cervix, and 45 lymphoma cancer patient cases were included in this retrospective study. Performance and robustness of the proposed model were assessed with measures of feature selection stability, outcome prediction accuracy, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Comparison with other methods were conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and superior performance of the proposed model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belief Function Theory (BFT); Cancer therapy; PET images; Radiomics; Treatment outcome prediction

Year:  2018        PMID: 31903444      PMCID: PMC6941853          DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2872406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci        ISSN: 2469-7303


  20 in total

1.  Feature selection with kernel class separability.

Authors:  Lei Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Advanced statistical matrices for texture characterization: application to cell classification.

Authors:  Guillaume Thibault; Jesús Angulo; Fernand Meyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges.

Authors:  Virendra Kumar; Yuhua Gu; Satrajit Basu; Anders Berglund; Steven A Eschrich; Matthew B Schabath; Kenneth Forster; Hugo J W L Aerts; Andre Dekker; David Fenstermacher; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Philippe Lambin; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Mathieu Hatt; Nidal Albarghach; Olivier Pradier; Jean-Philippe Metges; Laurent Corcos; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Pretreatment metabolic tumour volume is predictive of disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Charles Lemarignier; Frédéric Di Fiore; Charline Marre; Sébastien Hapdey; Romain Modzelewski; Pierrick Gouel; Pierre Michel; Bernard Dubray; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Robust feature selection to predict tumor treatment outcome.

Authors:  Hongmei Mi; Caroline Petitjean; Bernard Dubray; Pierre Vera; Su Ruan
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach.

Authors:  Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction.

Authors:  Konstantina Kourou; Themis P Exarchos; Konstantinos P Exarchos; Michalis V Karamouzis; Dimitrios I Fotiadis
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.271

9.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Predictive and prognostic value of PET/CT imaging post-chemoradiotherapy and clinical decision-making consequences in locally advanced head & neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ryul Kim; Chan-Young Ock; Bhumsuk Keam; Tae Min Kim; Jin Ho Kim; Jin Chul Paeng; Seong Keun Kwon; J Hun Hah; Tack-Kyun Kwon; Dong-Wan Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Myung-Whun Sung; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  5 in total

1.  Current status and quality of radiomics studies in lymphoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hongxi Wang; Yi Zhou; Li Li; Wenxiu Hou; Xuelei Ma; Rong Tian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Lymphoma PET Imaging:: A Scoping Review (Current Trends and Future Directions).

Authors:  Navid Hasani; Sriram S Paravastu; Faraz Farhadi; Fereshteh Yousefirizi; Michael A Morris; Arman Rahmim; Mark Roschewski; Ronald M Summers; Babak Saboury
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2022-01

Review 3.  Radiomics in Oncological PET Imaging: A Systematic Review-Part 2, Infradiaphragmatic Cancers, Blood Malignancies, Melanoma and Musculoskeletal Cancers.

Authors:  David Morland; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Luca Boldrini; Roberto Gatta; Daniele Pizzuto; Salvatore Annunziata
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Improved Prognosis of Treatment Failure in Cervical Cancer with Nontumor PET/CT Radiomics.

Authors:  Tahir I Yusufaly; Jingjing Zou; Tyler J Nelson; Casey W Williamson; Aaron Simon; Meenakshi Singhal; Hannah Liu; Hank Wong; Cheryl C Saenz; Jyoti Mayadev; Michael T McHale; Catheryn M Yashar; Ramez Eskander; Andrew Sharabi; Carl K Hoh; Sebastian Obrzut; Loren K Mell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 11.082

5.  Current status of Radiomics for cancer management: Challenges versus opportunities for clinical practice.

Authors:  Hua Li; Issam El Naqa; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.