Erica S Alexander1, Lillian Xiong2, Grayson L Baird3, Hiran Fernando4, Damian E Dupuy5. 1. Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Erica.s.alexander@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 4. Department of Surgery, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia. 5. Cape Cod Hospital, Hyannis, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate tumor and ablation zone morphology and densitometry related to tumor recurrence in participants with Stage IA non-small cell lung cancer undergoing radiofrequency ablation in a prospective, multicenter trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five participants (median 76 years old; 25 women; 20 men) from 16 sites were followed for 2 years (December 2006 to November 2010) with computed tomography (CT) densitometry. Imaging findings before and after ablation were recorded, including maximum CT attenuation (in Hounsfield units) at precontrast and 45-, 90-, 180-, and 300-s postcontrast. RESULTS: Every 1-cm increase in the largest axial diameter of the ablation zone at 3-months' follow-up compared to the index tumor reduced the odds of 2-year recurrence by 52% (P = .02). A 1-cm difference performed the best (sensitivity, 0.56; specificity, 0.93; positive likelihood ratio of 8). CT densitometry precontrast and at 45 seconds showed significantly different enhancement patterns in a comparison among pretreated lung cancer (delta = +61.2 HU), tumor recurrence (delta = +57 HU), and treated tumor/ablation zone (delta [change in attenuation] = +16.9 HU), (P < .0001). Densitometry from 45 to 300 s was also different among pretreated tumor (delta = -6.8 HU), recurrence (delta = -11.2 HU), and treated tumor (delta = +12.1 HU; P = .01). Untreated and residual tumor demonstrated washout, whereas treated tumor demonstrated increased attenuation. CONCLUSIONS: An ablation zone ≥1 cm larger than the initial tumor, based on 3-month follow-up imaging, is recommended to decrease odds of recurrence. CT densitometry can delineate tumor versus treatment zones.
PURPOSE: To evaluate tumor and ablation zone morphology and densitometry related to tumor recurrence in participants with Stage IA non-small cell lung cancer undergoing radiofrequency ablation in a prospective, multicenter trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five participants (median 76 years old; 25 women; 20 men) from 16 sites were followed for 2 years (December 2006 to November 2010) with computed tomography (CT) densitometry. Imaging findings before and after ablation were recorded, including maximum CT attenuation (in Hounsfield units) at precontrast and 45-, 90-, 180-, and 300-s postcontrast. RESULTS: Every 1-cm increase in the largest axial diameter of the ablation zone at 3-months' follow-up compared to the index tumor reduced the odds of 2-year recurrence by 52% (P = .02). A 1-cm difference performed the best (sensitivity, 0.56; specificity, 0.93; positive likelihood ratio of 8). CT densitometry precontrast and at 45 seconds showed significantly different enhancement patterns in a comparison among pretreated lung cancer (delta = +61.2 HU), tumor recurrence (delta = +57 HU), and treated tumor/ablation zone (delta [change in attenuation] = +16.9 HU), (P < .0001). Densitometry from 45 to 300 s was also different among pretreated tumor (delta = -6.8 HU), recurrence (delta = -11.2 HU), and treated tumor (delta = +12.1 HU; P = .01). Untreated and residual tumor demonstrated washout, whereas treated tumor demonstrated increased attenuation. CONCLUSIONS: An ablation zone ≥1 cm larger than the initial tumor, based on 3-month follow-up imaging, is recommended to decrease odds of recurrence. CT densitometry can delineate tumor versus treatment zones.
Authors: S J Swensen; R W Viggiano; D E Midthun; N L Müller; A Sherrick; K Yamashita; D P Naidich; E F Patz; T E Hartman; J R Muhm; A L Weaver Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sevin Baser; Vickie R Shannon; Georgie A Eapen; Carlos A Jimenez; Amir Onn; Leendert Keus; E Lin; Rodolfo C Morice Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Farrah J Wolf; David J Grand; Jason T Machan; Thomas A Dipetrillo; William W Mayo-Smith; Damian E Dupuy Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: T de Baère; A Aupérin; F Deschamps; P Chevallier; Y Gaubert; V Boige; M Fonck; B Escudier; J Palussiére Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 32.976