Purpose: Aims to determine the variability of ffERG measurements in patients with clinically stable birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR). Methods: Repeatability coefficients (RC) of ffERG amplitudes and implicit times were calculated from 11 BCR patients. Jackknife resampling estimated 95% confidence intervals of each ERG parameter's RC and the percentage change explained by variability alone was calculated. Results: Intra-visit variability in ffERG parameters was lower than inter-visit. Intravisit RCs demonstrated that for intravisit ERG testing, there was less than 30% variation in ERG amplitude for most parameters. For inter-visit ERG testing, a greater than 40% reduction in ERG amplitude may be clinically meaningful for 6 of 8 ERG parameters. Photopic single flash responses have <2 msec of test-retest variability both within and across visits.Conclusions: A 40% reduction in ERG amplitude and/or a delay of >2 msec in the photopic single flash response may be suitable criteria for meaningful change in BCR patients.
Purpose: Aims to determine the variability of ffERG measurements in patients with clinically stable birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR). Methods: Repeatability coefficients (RC) of ffERG amplitudes and implicit times were calculated from 11 BCR patients. Jackknife resampling estimated 95% confidence intervals of each ERG parameter's RC and the percentage change explained by variability alone was calculated. Results: Intra-visit variability in ffERG parameters was lower than inter-visit. Intravisit RCs demonstrated that for intravisit ERG testing, there was less than 30% variation in ERG amplitude for most parameters. For inter-visit ERG testing, a greater than 40% reduction in ERG amplitude may be clinically meaningful for 6 of 8 ERG parameters. Photopic single flash responses have <2 msec of test-retest variability both within and across visits.Conclusions: A 40% reduction in ERG amplitude and/or a delay of >2 msec in the photopic single flash response may be suitable criteria for meaningful change in BCR patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electroretinography; birdshot chorioretinopathy; test variability
Authors: Jonas J W Kuiper; Jessica Van Setten; Stephan Ripke; Ruben Van 'T Slot; Flip Mulder; Tom Missotten; G Seerp Baarsma; Laurent C Francioli; Sara L Pulit; Carolien G F De Kovel; Ninette Ten Dam-Van Loon; Anneke I Den Hollander; Paulien Huis in het Veld; Carel B Hoyng; Miguel Cordero-Coma; Javier Martín; Victor Llorenç; Bharti Arya; Dhanes Thomas; Steven C Bakker; Roel A Ophoff; Aniki Rothova; Paul I W De Bakker; Tuna Mutis; Bobby P C Koeleman Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-06-22 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sharmila Vaz; Torbjörn Falkmer; Anne Elizabeth Passmore; Richard Parsons; Pantelis Andreou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna M Waldie; Angharad E Hobby; Isabelle Chow; Elisa E Cornish; Mathura Indusegaran; Aleksandra Pekacka; Phuc Nguyen; Clare Fraser; Alison M Binns; Miles R Stanford; Christopher J Hammond; Peter J McCluskey; John R Grigg; Omar A Mahroo Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.048