Literature DB >> 21236528

Clinical outcomes of the first midwife-led normal birth unit in China: a retrospective cohort study.

Ngai Fen Cheung1, Rosemary Mander, Xiaoli Wang, Wei Fu, Hong Zhou, Liping Zhang.   

Abstract

AIMS: to report the clinical outcomes of the first six months of operation of an innovative midwife-led normal birth unit (MNBU) in China in 2008, aiming to facilitate normal birth and enhance midwifery practice.
SETTING: an urban hospital with 2000-3000 deliveries per year.
METHOD: this study was part of a major action research project that led to implementation of the MNBU. A retrospective cohort and a questionnaire survey were used. The data were analysed thematically. PARTICIPANTS: the outcomes of the first 226 women accessing the MNBU were compared with a matched retrospective cohort of 226 women accessing standard care. In total, 128 participants completed a satisfaction questionnaire before discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: mode of birth and model of care.
FINDINGS: the vaginal birth rate was 87.6% in the MNBU compared with 58.8% in the standard care unit. All women who accessed the MNBU were supported by both a midwife and a birth companion, referred to as 'two-to-one' care. None of the women labouring in the standard care unit were identified as having a birth companion. DISCUSSION: the concept of 'two-to-one' care emerged as fundamental to women's experiences and utilisation of midwives' skills to promote normal birth and decrease the likelihood of a caesarean section.
CONCLUSION: the MNBU provides an environment where midwives can practice to the full extent of their role. The high vaginal birth rate in the MNBU indicates the potential of this model of care to reduce obstetric intervention and increase women's satisfaction with care within a context of extraordinary high caesarean section rates. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: midwife-led care implies a separation of obstetric care from maternity care, which has been advocated in many European countries.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21236528     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  6 in total

1.  Are women attending a midwifery-led birthing center at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?

Authors:  Bobby D O'Leary; Vineta Ciprike
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Long; Emma R Allanson; Jennifer Pontre; Özge Tunçalp; George Justus Hofmeyr; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2016-09-02

3.  Developing a midwifery service task list for Chinese midwives in the task-shifting context: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Yan Ding; Xu Qian; Chunyi Gu; Helena Lindgren; Xiaojiao Wang; Zheng Zhang; Shuang Liang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Cesarean section in the People's Republic of China: current perspectives.

Authors:  Xing Lin Feng; Ying Wang; Lin An; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-09

5.  Effects of midwife-led maternity services on postpartum wellbeing and clinical outcomes in primiparous women under China's one-child policy.

Authors:  Jing Hua; Liping Zhu; Li Du; Yu Li; Zhuochun Wu; Da Wo; Wenchong Du
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Health system redesign for maternal and newborn survival: rethinking care models to close the global equity gap.

Authors:  Sanam Roder-DeWan; Kojo Nimako; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Archana Amatya; Ana Langer; Margaret Kruk
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.