Literature DB >> 31900647

Comparison between standard and transepithelial corneal crosslinking using a theranostic UV-A device.

Giuseppe Lombardo1,2, Sebastiano Serrao3, Marco Lombardo4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess corneal concentration of riboflavin in two different corneal crosslinking protocols performed by a novel image-guided therapeutic (or "theranostic") UV-A device.
METHODS: Ten human eye bank donor tissues were used in this work. The tissues underwent corneal cross-linking according to the conventional treatment protocol (n = 5; 30 min of stromal soaking followed by 30 min of 3 mW/cm2 UV-A irradiance) and the iontophoresis-assisted transepithelial protocol (n = 5; soaking for 5 min at 1 mA/min and 9 min of 10 mW/cm2 UV-A irradiance) using a theranostic UV-A device (Vision Engineering Italy srl, Italy). The device provided real time assessment of riboflavin concentration by hyperspectral image analysis of the cornea. A 0.1% riboflavin hypotonic solution (Ricrolin+, Sooft Italia Spa, Italy) was used in all cases.
RESULTS: Manual application of hypotonic riboflavin for 30 min into the stroma achieved greater corneal riboflavin concentration (425 ± 77 μg/cm3) than transepithelial delivery of riboflavin by corneal iontophoresis (195 ± 35 μg/cm3; P = 0.001). In both UV-A irradiation protocols, corneal riboflavin concentration decreased exponentially with a constant energy rate of 2.3 ± 0.5 J/cm2 and 1.8 ± 0.3 J/cm2 respectively. At the end of treatment, the average corneal concentration of riboflavin decreased by ≥ 85%, with values of 54 ± 29 μg/cm3 and 31 ± 9 μg/cm3 (P = 0.11), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Manual application of riboflavin onto the stroma achieved almost 50% greater concentration of riboflavin than transepithelial delivery by corneal iontophoresis. The theranostic UV-A device provided a novel approach to estimate corneal concentration of riboflavin non-invasively during treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal crosslinking; Iontophoresis; Keratoconus; Riboflavin; Theranostics

Year:  2020        PMID: 31900647     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04595-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  31 in total

Review 1.  Enzymatic and nonenzymatic cross-linking of collagen and elastin.

Authors:  K Reiser; R J McCormick; R B Rucker
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Biomechanical changes in the human cornea after transepithelial corneal crosslinking using iontophoresis.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Marianna Rosati; Pietro Ducoli; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Interaction of ultraviolet light with the cornea: clinical implications for corneal crosslinking.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Giuseppe Pucci; Riccardo Barberi; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 4.  Safety and efficacy of epithelium removal and transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Z Shalchi; X Wang; M A Nanavaty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Transepithelial Iontophoresis Versus Standard Corneal Collagen Cross-linking: 1-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Paolo Vinciguerra; Vito Romano; Pietro Rosetta; Emanuela F Legrottaglie; Raffaele Piscopo; Claudia Fabiani; Claudio Azzolini; Riccardo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Intraoperative corneal thickness change and clinical outcomes after corneal collagen crosslinking: Standard crosslinking versus hypotonic riboflavin.

Authors:  Elan Rosenblat; Peter S Hersh
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Noninvasive real-time assessment of riboflavin consumption in standard and accelerated corneal crosslinking.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Iontophoresis Transcorneal Delivery Technique for Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking With Riboflavin in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Myriam Cassagne; Camille Laurent; Magda Rodrigues; Anne Galinier; Eberhard Spoerl; Stéphane D Galiacy; Vincent Soler; Pierre Fournié; François Malecaze
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Modeling the efficacy profiles of UV-light activated corneal collagen crosslinking.

Authors:  Jui-Teng Lin; Da-Chuan Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Standard corneal collagen crosslinking versus transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted corneal crosslinking, 24 months follow-up: randomized control trial.

Authors:  Guzel Bikbova; Mukharram Bikbov
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.761

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhanced Transepithelial Riboflavin Delivery Using Femtosecond Laser-Machined Epithelial Microchannels.

Authors:  Samantha Bradford; Eric Mikula; Yilu Xie; Tibor Juhasz; Donald J Brown; James V Jester
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.283

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.