Literature DB >> 24644053

Iontophoresis Transcorneal Delivery Technique for Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking With Riboflavin in a Rabbit Model.

Myriam Cassagne1, Camille Laurent2, Magda Rodrigues2, Anne Galinier3, Eberhard Spoerl4, Stéphane D Galiacy1, Vincent Soler1, Pierre Fournié5, François Malecaze1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared an iontophoresis riboflavin delivery technique for transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (I-CXL) with a conventional CXL (C-CXL).
METHODS: We designed three experimental sets using 152 New Zealand rabbits to study riboflavin application by iontophoresis using charged riboflavin solution (Ricrolin+) with a 1-mA current for 5 minutes. The first set was to compare riboflavin concentration measured by HPLC in corneas after iontophoresis or conventional riboflavin application. The second set was to analyze autofluorescence and stromal collagen modification immediately and 14 days after I-CXL or C-CXL, by using nonlinear two-photon microscopy (TP) and second harmonic generation (SHG). In the third set, physical modifications after I-CXL and C-CXL were evaluated by stress-strain measurements and by studying corneal resistance against collagenase digestion.
RESULTS: Based on HPLC analysis, we found that iontophoresis allowed riboflavin diffusion with 2-fold less riboflavin concentration than conventional application (936.2 ± 312.5 and 1708 ± 908.3 ng/mL, respectively, P < 0.05). Corneal TP and SHG imaging revealed that I-CXL and C-CXL resulted in a comparable increased anterior and median stromal autofluorescence and collagen packing. The stress at 10% strain showed a similar stiffness of corneas treated by I-CXL or C-CXL (631.9 ± 241.5 and 680.3 ± 216.4 kPa, respectively, P = 0.908). Moreover, we observed an increased resistance against corneal collagenase digestion after I-CXL and C-CXL (61.90% ± 5.28% and 72.21% ± 4.32% of remaining surface, respectively, P = 0.154).
CONCLUSIONS: This experimental study suggests that I-CXL is a promising alternative methodology for riboflavin delivery in crosslinking treatments, preserving the epithelium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 24644053     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  28 in total

1.  Standard, transepithelial and iontophoresis corneal cross-linking: clinical analysis of three surgical techniques.

Authors:  Settimio Rossi; Carmine Santamaria; Rosa Boccia; Luigi De Rosa; Francesco Maria D'Alterio; Francesca Simonelli; Giuseppe De Rosa
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Early effects of corneal collagen cross-linking by iontophoresis in ex vivo human corneas.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Stefano Ambrosini; Iacopo Paladini; Eleonora Favuzza; Carlotta Boccalini; Giulia Raugei; Gabriella Barbara Vannelli; Mirca Marini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Efficacy of iontophoresis-assisted epithelium-on corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Hong-Zhen Jia; Xiu-Jun Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Dual-Phase Iontophoresis for the Delivery of Antisense Oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Daniel J Gibson; Sonal S Tuli; Gregory S Schultz
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.486

6.  Iontophoresis-assisted corneal crosslinking using 0.1% riboflavin for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Hong-Zhen Jia; Xu Pang; Zheng-Jun Fan; Na Li; Gang Li; Xiu-Jun Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Riboflavin concentration in corneal stroma after intracameral injection.

Authors:  Na Li; Xiu-Jun Peng; Zheng-Jun Fan; Xu Pang; Yu Xia; Teng-Fei Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 8.  Corneal Cross-Linking for Pediatric Keratcoconus Review.

Authors:  Claudia Perez-Straziota; Ronald N Gaster; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Confocal microscopy evaluation of stromal fluorescence intensity after standard and accelerated iontophoresis-assisted corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Manuela Lanzini; Claudia Curcio; Eberhard Spoerl; Roberta Calienno; Alessandra Mastropasqua; Martina Colasante; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Mario Nubile; Leonardo Mastropasqua
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Comparison between standard and transepithelial corneal crosslinking using a theranostic UV-A device.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Marco Lombardo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.