Literature DB >> 27722754

Transepithelial Iontophoresis Versus Standard Corneal Collagen Cross-linking: 1-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.

Paolo Vinciguerra, Vito Romano, Pietro Rosetta, Emanuela F Legrottaglie, Raffaele Piscopo, Claudia Fabiani, Claudio Azzolini, Riccardo Vinciguerra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 1-year transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking with iontophoresis (I-CXL) outcomes with standard CXL (S-CXL) epithelium-off for progressive keratoconus.
METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients with progressive keratoconus were included in this comparative, prospective clinical study. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent, cylinder refraction, corneal topography, Scheimpflug tomography, aberrometry, and endothelial cell count were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up.
RESULTS: Patients received either I-CXL (20 eyes) or S-CXL (20 eyes). Functional parameters (visual acuity and aberrometry) showed a significant improvement (P < .05) after 6 and 12 months of follow-up in both groups. In the I-CXL group, the CDVA showed a rapid recovery of vision after 3 months (P = .01) compared to baseline. Morphological parameters showed a significant reduction of maximum keratometry in the S-CXL group by -1.05 ± 1.51 diopters (D) after 12 months, whereas the I-CXL group curvature was stable (-0.31 ± 1.87 D). Minimum pachymetry values were stable even after 12 months of follow-up in the I-CXL group, whereas a significant corneal thinning 12 months following treatment was recorded in the S-CXL group (P < .001). None of the patients had continuous progression of keratoconus or had to repeat CXL procedures. Endothelial cell counts did not change significantly (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year outcomes suggest that I-CXL might be comparable to S-CXL in stabilizing the progression of the degenerative ectatic disease. Additionally, quicker improvement of functional parameters was reported in the I-CXL group. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):672-678.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27722754     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20160629-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  11 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives in keratoconus treatment: an update on iontophoresis-assisted corneal collagen crosslinking.

Authors:  Paolo Vinciguerra; Alessio Montericcio; Fiammetta Catania; Giovanni Fossati; Raffaele Raimondi; Emanuela Filomena Legrottaglie; Riccardo Vinciguerra
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Efficacy of iontophoresis-assisted epithelium-on corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Hong-Zhen Jia; Xiu-Jun Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Adverse events after riboflavin/UV-A corneal cross-linking: a literature review.

Authors:  Sebastiano Serrao; Giuseppe Lombardo; Marco Lombardo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Management of an ophthalmology department during COVID-19 pandemic in Milan, Italy.

Authors:  Emanuela Filomena Legrottaglie; Laura Balia; Fabrizio Ivo Camesasca; Jose Luis Vallejo-Garcia; Giovanni Fossati; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Pietro Rosetta; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Comparison between standard and transepithelial corneal crosslinking using a theranostic UV-A device.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Marco Lombardo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Sueko M Ng; Mark Ren; Kristina B Lindsley; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

8.  Epi-Off versus Epi-On Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus Patients: A Comparative Study through 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  F Cifariello; M Minicucci; F Di Renzo; D Di Taranto; G Coclite; S Zaccaria; S De Turris; C Costagliola
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Comparison of Standard and Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Di; Jingyi Wang; Ying Li; Yang Jiang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Three-year results of accelerated transepithelial cross-linking (30 mW/cm2 × 3 min) for keratoconus: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hitoha Ishii; Junko Yoshida; Tetsuya Toyono; Satoru Yamagami; Tomohiko Usui; Takashi Miyai
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.