PURPOSE: While the goal of craniofacial reconstruction surgery is to restore the cranial head shape as much towards normal as possible, for the individual patient, there is, in fact, no normal three-dimensional (3D) model to act as a guide. In this project, we generated a library of normative pediatric skulls from which a guiding template could be fabricated for a more standardized, objective and precise correction of craniosynostosis. METHODS: Computed tomography data from 103 normal subjects aged 8-12 months were compiled and a 3D computational model of the skull was generated for each subject. The models were mathematically registered to a baseline model for each month of age within this range and then averaged, resulting in a single 3D point cloud. An external cranial surface was subsequently passed through the point cloud and its shape and size customized to fit the head circumference of individual patients. RESULTS: The resultant fabricated skull models provide a novel and applicable tool for a detailed, quantitative comparison between the normative and patient skulls for preoperative planning and practice for a variety of craniofacial procedures including vault remodeling. Additionally, it was possible to extract the suprafrontal orbit anatomy from the normative model and fabricate a bandeau template to guide intraoperative reshaping. CONCLUSIONS: Normative head shapes for pediatric patients have wide application for craniofacial surgery including planning, practice, standarized operative repair, and standardized measurement and reporting of outcomes.
PURPOSE: While the goal of craniofacial reconstruction surgery is to restore the cranial head shape as much towards normal as possible, for the individual patient, there is, in fact, no normal three-dimensional (3D) model to act as a guide. In this project, we generated a library of normative pediatric skulls from which a guiding template could be fabricated for a more standardized, objective and precise correction of craniosynostosis. METHODS: Computed tomography data from 103 normal subjects aged 8-12 months were compiled and a 3D computational model of the skull was generated for each subject. The models were mathematically registered to a baseline model for each month of age within this range and then averaged, resulting in a single 3D point cloud. An external cranial surface was subsequently passed through the point cloud and its shape and size customized to fit the head circumference of individual patients. RESULTS: The resultant fabricated skull models provide a novel and applicable tool for a detailed, quantitative comparison between the normative and patient skulls for preoperative planning and practice for a variety of craniofacial procedures including vault remodeling. Additionally, it was possible to extract the suprafrontal orbit anatomy from the normative model and fabricate a bandeau template to guide intraoperative reshaping. CONCLUSIONS: Normative head shapes for pediatric patients have wide application for craniofacial surgery including planning, practice, standarized operative repair, and standardized measurement and reporting of outcomes.
Authors: Fernando Burstein; Barry Eppley; Roger Hudgins; Joseph Williams; William Boydston; Andrew Reisner; Kevin Stevenson Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Jonathan Burge; Nikoo R Saber; Thomas Looi; Brooke French; Zoha Usmani; Niloofar Anooshiravani; Peter Kim; Christopher Forrest; John Phillips Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Jeffrey R Marcus; Leahthan F Domeshek; Andre M Loyd; John M Schoenleber; Rajesh R Das; Roger W Nightingale; Srinivasan Mukundan Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Heinz-Theo Luebbers; Peter Messmer; Joachim Anton Obwegeser; Roger Arthur Zwahlen; Ron Kikinis; Klaus Wilhelm Graetz; Felix Matthews Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Antonio R Porras; Beatriz Paniagua; Scott Ensel; Robert Keating; Gary F Rogers; Andinet Enquobahrie; Marius George Linguraru Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Antonio Reyes PorrasPerez; Robert Keating; Janice Lee; Marius George Linguraru Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Manon L Tolhuisen; Guido A de Jong; Ruud J M van Damme; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Hans H K Delye Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Shusil Dangi; Hina Shah; Antonio R Porras; Beatriz Paniagua; Cristian A Linte; Marius Linguraru; Andinet Enquobahrie Journal: Healthc Technol Lett Date: 2017-09-14
Authors: Markus Lehner; D Wendling-Keim; M Kunz; S Deininger; S Zundel; A Peraud; G Mast Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Olivia A Ho; Nikoo Saber; Derek Stephens; April Clausen; James Drake; Christopher Forrest; John Phillips Journal: Plast Surg (Oakv) Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 0.947