Literature DB >> 22089323

Generation of normative pediatric skull models for use in cranial vault remodeling procedures.

Nikoo R Saber1, John Phillips, Thomas Looi, Zoha Usmani, Jonathan Burge, James Drake, Peter C W Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While the goal of craniofacial reconstruction surgery is to restore the cranial head shape as much towards normal as possible, for the individual patient, there is, in fact, no normal three-dimensional (3D) model to act as a guide. In this project, we generated a library of normative pediatric skulls from which a guiding template could be fabricated for a more standardized, objective and precise correction of craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Computed tomography data from 103 normal subjects aged 8-12 months were compiled and a 3D computational model of the skull was generated for each subject. The models were mathematically registered to a baseline model for each month of age within this range and then averaged, resulting in a single 3D point cloud. An external cranial surface was subsequently passed through the point cloud and its shape and size customized to fit the head circumference of individual patients.
RESULTS: The resultant fabricated skull models provide a novel and applicable tool for a detailed, quantitative comparison between the normative and patient skulls for preoperative planning and practice for a variety of craniofacial procedures including vault remodeling. Additionally, it was possible to extract the suprafrontal orbit anatomy from the normative model and fabricate a bandeau template to guide intraoperative reshaping.
CONCLUSIONS: Normative head shapes for pediatric patients have wide application for craniofacial surgery including planning, practice, standarized operative repair, and standardized measurement and reporting of outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22089323     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-011-1630-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  8 in total

1.  Application of the spanning plate concept to frontal orbital advancement: techniques and clinical experience in 60 patients.

Authors:  Fernando Burstein; Barry Eppley; Roger Hudgins; Joseph Williams; William Boydston; Andrew Reisner; Kevin Stevenson
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Application of CAD/CAM prefabricated age-matched templates in cranio-orbital remodeling in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Jonathan Burge; Nikoo R Saber; Thomas Looi; Brooke French; Zoha Usmani; Niloofar Anooshiravani; Peter Kim; Christopher Forrest; John Phillips
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Point set registration: coherent point drift.

Authors:  Andriy Myronenko; Xubo Song
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Optimizing craniofacial osteotomies: applications of haptic and rapid prototyping technology.

Authors:  Dylan John Murray; Glenn Edwards; James G Mainprize; Oleh Antonyshyn
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  CAD-CAM construction of an auricular template for craniofacial implant positioning: a novel approach to diagnosis.

Authors:  L Ciocca; R Mingucci; G Bacci; R Scotti
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Use of a three-dimensional, normative database of pediatric craniofacial morphology for modern anthropometric analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Marcus; Leahthan F Domeshek; Andre M Loyd; John M Schoenleber; Rajesh R Das; Roger W Nightingale; Srinivasan Mukundan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Heinz-Theo Luebbers; Peter Messmer; Joachim Anton Obwegeser; Roger Arthur Zwahlen; Ron Kikinis; Klaus Wilhelm Graetz; Felix Matthews
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Individualized template-guided remodeling of the fronto-orbital bandeau in craniosynostosis corrective surgery.

Authors:  Helena Pappa; David Richardson; Andy A C Webb; Paul May
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.046

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Culture meets surgery.

Authors:  Hannes Haberl
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Nicholas Wetjen; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Locally Affine Diffeomorphic Surface Registration and Its Application to Surgical Planning of Fronto-Orbital Advancement.

Authors:  Antonio R Porras; Beatriz Paniagua; Scott Ensel; Robert Keating; Gary F Rogers; Andinet Enquobahrie; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Predictive Statistical Model of Early Cranial Development.

Authors:  Antonio Reyes PorrasPerez; Robert Keating; Janice Lee; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Unicoronal Craniosynostosis and Plagiocephaly Correction with Fronto-orbital Bone Remodeling and Advancement.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

6.  Cranial shape comparison for automated objective 3D craniosynostosis surgery planning.

Authors:  Manon L Tolhuisen; Guido A de Jong; Ruud J M van Damme; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Hans H K Delye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Robust head CT image registration pipeline for craniosynostosis skull correction surgery.

Authors:  Shusil Dangi; Hina Shah; Antonio R Porras; Beatriz Paniagua; Cristian A Linte; Marius Linguraru; Andinet Enquobahrie
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2017-09-14

8.  On-site CAD templates reduce surgery time for complex craniostenosis repair in infants: a new method.

Authors:  Markus Lehner; D Wendling-Keim; M Kunz; S Deininger; S Zundel; A Peraud; G Mast
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Comparing the Use of 3D Photogrammetry and Computed Tomography in Assessing the Severity of Single-Suture Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Olivia A Ho; Nikoo Saber; Derek Stephens; April Clausen; James Drake; Christopher Forrest; John Phillips
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  "Black bone": the new backbone in CAD/CAM-assisted craniosynostosis surgery?

Authors:  Bernd Lethaus; Dimitar Gruichev; Daniel Gräfe; Alexander K Bartella; Sebastian Hahnel; Tsanko Yovev; Niels Christian Pausch; Matthias Krause
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.