Literature DB >> 24333232

Three-dimensional preoperative virtual planning and template use for surgical correction of craniosynostosis.

Samir Mardini1, Saad Alsubaie2, Cenk Cayci2, Harvey Chim2, Nicholas Wetjen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical correction of craniosynostosis aims to remodel the cranial vault to achieve a morphology approaching that of age-matched norms. However, current surgical technique is highly subjective and based largely on the surgeon's artistic vision in creating a normal head shape. Here, we present our technique and report our experience with the use of virtual surgery using computer-assisted design (CAD)/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) techniques to create a prefabricated template for the planning of osteotomies and the placement of bone segments, to achieve standardised, objective and precise correction of craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Four patients who underwent cranial vault remodelling (CVR; three metopic synostosis and one sagittal synostosis) underwent virtual surgical planning (VSP) preoperatively using CAD/CAM techniques. VSP allows pre-planning of osteotomies to achieve the desired cranial vault shape. Surgical osteotomies and placement of bone segments were performed intra-operatively based on prefabricated templates.
RESULTS: All patients demonstrated markedly improved head shape postoperatively. One patient developed a subdural haematoma 6 weeks postoperatively subsequent to a fall where he hit his head. The haematoma was drained and a soft spot was present in that location 3 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: The use of virtual surgery and prefabricated cutting guides allows for a more precise and rapid reconstruction. Surgical osteotomies are pre-planned and rapidly performed using a template, and precise placement of calvarial bone segments is achieved without the need for subjective assessment of the desired calvarial shape. In addition, patients and families have a significantly better understanding of the disease process and anticipated surgery preoperatively with the visualisation achieved through virtual surgery. This results in better alignment of hopes and expectations between the parents and surgeons.
Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; Computer-aided design; Cranial vault remodelling; Craniosynostosis; Virtual surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24333232     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  12 in total

1.  Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Nicholas Wetjen; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note.

Authors:  Andrew J Kobets; Adam Ammar; Jonathan Nakhla; Aleka Scoco; Rani Nasser; James T Goodrich; Rick Abbott
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Use of computer-assisted design and manufacturing to localize dural venous sinuses during reconstructive surgery for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Rajiv R Iyer; Adela Wu; Alexandra Macmillan; Leila Musavi; Regina Cho; Joseph Lopez; George I Jallo; Amir H Dorafshar; Edward S Ahn
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Smartphone-assisted Augmented Reality in Craniofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Feras Alshomer; Abdualziz Alazzam; Ahmed Alturki; Obaid Almeshal; Hanan Alhusainan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-13

5.  Locally Affine Diffeomorphic Surface Registration and Its Application to Surgical Planning of Fronto-Orbital Advancement.

Authors:  Antonio R Porras; Beatriz Paniagua; Scott Ensel; Robert Keating; Gary F Rogers; Andinet Enquobahrie; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

Authors:  Emilie Robertson; Peter Kwan; Gorman Louie; Pierre Boulanger; Daniel Aalto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-25

7.  Cranial shape comparison for automated objective 3D craniosynostosis surgery planning.

Authors:  Manon L Tolhuisen; Guido A de Jong; Ruud J M van Damme; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Hans H K Delye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Review of Objective Measurement of Flap Volume in Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Alain Joe Azzi; Roy Hilzenrat; Alex Viezel-Mathieu; Thomas Hemmerling; Mirko Gilardino
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-05-15

9.  Antibiofilm coatings through atmospheric pressure plasma for 3D printed surgical instruments.

Authors:  Ignacio Muro-Fraguas; Ana Sainz-García; María López; Beatriz Rojo-Bezares; Rodolfo Múgica-Vidal; Elisa Sainz-García; Paula Toledano; Yolanda Sáenz; Ana González-Marcos; Fernando Alba-Elías
Journal:  Surf Coat Technol       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 4.865

10.  On-site CAD templates reduce surgery time for complex craniostenosis repair in infants: a new method.

Authors:  Markus Lehner; D Wendling-Keim; M Kunz; S Deininger; S Zundel; A Peraud; G Mast
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.