Literature DB >> 23850466

Impact of brain tissue filtering on neurostimulation fields: a modeling study.

Tim Wagner1, Uri Eden, Jarrett Rushmore, Christopher J Russo, Laura Dipietro, Felipe Fregni, Stephen Simon, Stephen Rotman, Naomi B Pitskel, Ciro Ramos-Estebanez, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Alan J Grodzinsky, Markus Zahn, Antoni Valero-Cabré.   

Abstract

Electrical neurostimulation techniques, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), are increasingly used in the neurosciences, e.g., for studying brain function, and for neurotherapeutics, e.g., for treating depression, epilepsy, and Parkinson's disease. The characterization of electrical properties of brain tissue has guided our fundamental understanding and application of these methods, from electrophysiologic theory to clinical dosing-metrics. Nonetheless, prior computational models have primarily relied on ex-vivo impedance measurements. We recorded the in-vivo impedances of brain tissues during neurosurgical procedures and used these results to construct MRI guided computational models of TMS and DBS neurostimulatory fields and conductance-based models of neurons exposed to stimulation. We demonstrated that tissues carry neurostimulation currents through frequency dependent resistive and capacitive properties not typically accounted for by past neurostimulation modeling work. We show that these fundamental brain tissue properties can have significant effects on the neurostimulatory-fields (capacitive and resistive current composition and spatial/temporal dynamics) and neural responses (stimulation threshold, ionic currents, and membrane dynamics). These findings highlight the importance of tissue impedance properties on neurostimulation and impact our understanding of the biological mechanisms and technological potential of neurostimulatory methods.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF; Cellular models; Cerebral Spinal Fluid; DBS; Deep Brain Stimulation; FEM; Finite Element Model; HP; Hewlett Packard; IACUC; Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee; MRI; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neuromodulation; Neurostimulation; RMS; Root Mean Squared; TMS; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; VOA; Volumes of Activation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850466      PMCID: PMC4063680          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  44 in total

1.  Conductivities of three-layer live human skull.

Authors:  M Akhtari; H C Bryant; A N Mamelak; E R Flynn; L Heller; J J Shih; M Mandelkern; A Matlachov; D M Ranken; E D Best; M A DiMauro; R R Lee; W W Sutherling
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Ultra high field MRI at 8 Tesla of subacute hemorrhagic stroke.

Authors:  V Novak; A Kangarlu; A Abduljalil; P Novak; A Slivka; D Chakeres; P M Robitaille
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space.

Authors:  Claude Bédard; Helmut Kröger; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexis M Kuncel; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve.

Authors:  D R McNeal
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Electroneutrality and electrodiffusion in the squid axon.

Authors:  D Agin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Electrode polarization impedance and measurements in biological materials.

Authors:  H P Schwan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1968-02-01       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems.

Authors:  R Plonsey; D B Heppner
Journal:  Bull Math Biophys       Date:  1967-12

9.  Altenating current electrode polarization.

Authors:  H P Schwan
Journal:  Biophysik       Date:  1966

10.  Three-dimensional head model simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Tim A Wagner; Markus Zahn; Alan J Grodzinsky; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  19 in total

1.  Intracellular Impedance Measurements Reveal Non-ohmic Properties of the Extracellular Medium around Neurons.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Gomes; Claude Bédard; Silvana Valtcheva; Matthew Nelson; Vitalia Khokhlova; Pierre Pouget; Laurent Venance; Thierry Bal; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons.

Authors:  Aman S Aberra; Boshuo Wang; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  Is the Extracellular Impedance High and Non-resistive in Cerebral Cortex?

Authors:  Claude Bédard; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Hybrid Scheme for Modeling Local Field Potentials from Point-Neuron Networks.

Authors:  Espen Hagen; David Dahmen; Maria L Stavrinou; Henrik Lindén; Tom Tetzlaff; Sacha J van Albada; Sonja Grün; Markus Diesmann; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Development, validation, and pilot MRI safety study of a high-resolution, open source, whole body pediatric numerical simulation model.

Authors:  Hongbae Jeong; Georgios Ntolkeras; Michel Alhilani; Seyed Reza Atefi; Lilla Zöllei; Kyoko Fujimoto; Ali Pourvaziri; Michael H Lev; P Ellen Grant; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Extracellular and intracellular components of the impedance of neural tissue.

Authors:  Claude Bedard; Charlotte Piette; Laurent Venance; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Computing Extracellular Electric Potentials from Neuronal Simulations.

Authors:  Torbjørn V Ness; Geir Halnes; Solveig Næss; Klas H Pettersen; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

10.  Multi-scale modeling toolbox for single neuron and subcellular activity under Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Sina Shirinpour; Nicholas Hananeia; James Rosado; Harry Tran; Christos Galanis; Andreas Vlachos; Peter Jedlicka; Gillian Queisser; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.