Literature DB >> 31898035

Interactive, Up-to-date Meta-Analysis of MRI in the Management of Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.

Anton S Becker1, Julian Kirchner2, Thomas Sartoretti2, Soleen Ghafoor2, Sungmin Woo2, Chong Hyun Suh3, Joseph P Erinjeri2, Hedvig Hricak2, H Alberto Vargas2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test an interactive up-to-date meta-analysis (iu-ma) of studies on MRI in the management of men with suspected prostate cancer. Based on the findings of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses, two freely accessible dynamic meta-analyses (https://iu-ma.org) were designed using the programming language R in combination with the package "shiny." The first iu-ma compares the performance of the MRI-stratified pathway and the systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy pathway for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, while the second iu-ma focuses on the use of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Our iu-mas allow for the effortless addition of new studies and data, thereby enabling physicians to keep track of the most recent scientific developments without having to resort to classical static meta-analyses that may become outdated in a short period of time. Furthermore, the iu-mas enable in-depth subgroup analyses by a wide variety of selectable parameters. Such an analysis is not only tailored to the needs of the reader but is also far more comprehensive than a classical meta-analysis. In that respect, following multiple subgroup analyses, we found that even for various subgroups, detection rates of prostate cancer are not different between biparametric and multiparametric MRI. Secondly, we could confirm the favorable influence of MRI biopsy stratification for multiple clinical scenarios. For the future, we envisage the use of this technology in addressing further clinical questions of other organ systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Meta-analysis; Prostate cancer; Radiology

Year:  2020        PMID: 31898035      PMCID: PMC7256175          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00312-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Jelle O Barentsz; Thomas Hambrock; Derya Yakar; Diederik M Somford; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Tom W J Scheenen; Pieter C Vos; Henkjan Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Arend Heerschap; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A Deep Learning-Based Approach for the Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer in T2 Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Ruba Alkadi; Fatma Taher; Ayman El-Baz; Naoufel Werghi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Penny Whiting; Jonathan A C Sterne; Matthias Egger; Jonathan J Deeks; Aijing Shang; Lucas M Bachmann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 5.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Chong Hyun Suh; James A Eastham; Michael J Zelefsky; Michael J Morris; Wassim Abida; Howard I Scher; Robert Sidlow; Anton S Becker; Andreas G Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14

6.  Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anton S Becker; Alexander Cornelius; Cäcilia S Reiner; Daniel Stocker; Erika J Ulbrich; Borna K Barth; Ashkan Mortezavi; Daniel Eberli; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.

Authors:  Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Dirk Blondin; Michael Quentin; Andreas Hiester; Erhard Godehardt; Helmut E Gabbert; Nikolaus Becker; Gerald Antoch; Peter Albers; Lars Schimmöller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy.

Authors:  Lars Schimmöller; Michael Quentin; Christian Arsov; Andreas Hiester; Christian Buchbender; Robert Rabenalt; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Dirk Blondin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Automated Billing Code Retrieval from MRI Scanner Log Data.

Authors:  Jonas Denck; Wilfried Landschütz; Knud Nairz; Johannes T Heverhagen; Andreas Maier; Eva Rothgang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap.

Authors:  Julian H Elliott; Tari Turner; Ornella Clavisi; James Thomas; Julian P T Higgins; Chris Mavergames; Russell L Gruen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A narrative review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) implementation on screening, detection, and the overall accuracy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jacob W Greenberg; Christopher R Koller; Crystal Casado; Benjamin L Triche; L Spencer Krane
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making.

Authors:  Gorm E Shackelford; Philip A Martin; Amelia S C Hood; Alec P Christie; Elena Kulinskaya; William J Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 7.431

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.