Literature DB >> 24972954

MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy.

Lars Schimmöller1, Michael Quentin, Christian Arsov, Andreas Hiester, Christian Buchbender, Robert Rabenalt, Peter Albers, Gerald Antoch, Dirk Blondin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the accuracy of MR sequences [T2-, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (T2WI, DWI, and DCE) imaging] at 3T, based on the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) scoring system [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)] using MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsies as reference standard.
METHODS: In 235 consecutive patients [aged 65.7 ± 7.9 years; median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 8 ng/ml] with multiparametric prostate MRI (mp-MRI), 566 lesions were scored according to PI-RADS. Histology of all lesions was obtained by targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy.
RESULTS: In 200 lesions, biopsy revealed prostate cancer (PCa). The area under the curve (AUC) for cancer detection was 0.70 (T2WI), 0.80 (DWI), and 0.74 (DCE). A combination of T2WI + DWI, T2WI + DCE, and DWI + DCE achieved an AUC of 0.81, 0.78, and 0.79. A summed PI-RADS score of T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved an AUC of 0.81. For higher grade PCa (primary Gleason pattern ≥ 4), the AUC was 0.85 for T2WI + DWI, 0.84 for T2WI + DCE, 0.86 for DWI + DCE, and 0.87 for T2WI + DWI + DCE. The AUC for T2WI + DWI + DCE for transitional-zone PCa was 0.73, and for the peripheral zone 0.88. Regarding higher-grade PCa, AUC for transitional-zone PCa was 0.88, and for peripheral zone 0.96.
CONCLUSION: The combination of T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved the highest test accuracy, especially in patients with higher-grade PCa. The use of ≤2 MR sequences led to lower AUC in higher-grade and peripheral-zone cancers. KEY POINTS: • T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved the highest accuracy in patients with higher grade PCa • T2WI + DWI + DCE was more accurate for peripheral- than for transitional-zone PCa • DCE increased PCa detection accuracy in the peripheral zone • DWI was the leading sequence in the transitional zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24972954     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3276-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  Increased signal intensity of prostate lesions on high b-value diffusion-weighted images as a predictive sign of malignancy.

Authors:  Michael Quentin; Lars Schimmöller; Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Gerald Antoch; Peter Albers; Dirk Blondin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard.

Authors:  L Schimmöller; M Quentin; C Arsov; R S Lanzman; A Hiester; R Rabenalt; G Antoch; P Albers; D Blondin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy at 3 T.

Authors:  Klaas N A Nagel; Martijn G Schouten; Thomas Hambrock; Geert J S Litjens; Caroline M A Hoeks; Bennie ten Haken; Jelle O Barentsz; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  [PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate].

Authors:  M Röthke; D Blondin; H-P Schlemmer; T Franiel
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2013-02-12

5.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the prostate transition zone: histopathological validation using magnetic resonance-guided biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Eline K Vos; Joyce G R Bomers; Jelle O Barentsz; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Tom W Scheenen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Histology core-specific evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standardised scoring system of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate.

Authors:  Timur H Kuru; Matthias C Roethke; Philip Rieker; Wilfried Roth; Michael Fenchel; Markus Hohenfellner; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localization in correlation to whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Sofie Isebaert; Laura Van den Bergh; Karin Haustermans; Steven Joniau; Evelyne Lerut; Liesbeth De Wever; Frederik De Keyzer; Tom Budiharto; Pieter Slagmolen; Hendrik Van Poppel; Raymond Oyen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway?

Authors:  Louise Dickinson; Hashim U Ahmed; Clare Allen; Jelle O Barentsz; Brendan Carey; Jurgen J Futterer; Stijn W Heijmink; Peter Hoskin; Alex P Kirkham; Anwar R Padhani; Raj Persad; Philippe Puech; Shonit Punwani; Aslam Sohaib; Bertrand Tombal; Arnauld Villers; Mark Emberton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Prostate cancer: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI techniques for localization of peripheral zone tumor.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Amy Sabach; James S Babb; Brent W Matza; Samir S Taneja; Fang-Ming Deng
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  32 in total

1.  Multiparametric MRI of the prostate at 3 T: limited value of 3D (1)H-MR spectroscopy as a fourth parameter.

Authors:  Stephan H Polanec; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Peter Brader; Dietmar Georg; Shahrokh Shariat; Claudio Spick; Martin Susani; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Revised PROPELLER for T2-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: impact on lesion detection and PI-RADS classification.

Authors:  Michael Meier-Schroers; Christian Marx; Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Karsten Wolter; Jürgen Gieseke; Wolfgang Block; Alois Martin Sprinkart; Frank Traeber; Winfried Willinek; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?

Authors:  L Schimmöller; M Quentin; D Blondin; F Dietzel; A Hiester; C Schleich; C Thomas; R Rabenalt; H E Gabbert; P Albers; G Antoch; C Arsov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Short Dual-Pulse Sequence versus Standard Multiparametric MR Imaging-A Multireader Study.

Authors:  Borna K Barth; Pieter J L De Visschere; Alexander Cornelius; Carlos Nicolau; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Daniel Eberli; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Morand Piert; Jeffrey Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Javed Siddiqui; Virginia Rogers; Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran; Timothy D Johnson; Xia Shao; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: An intraindividual assessment of the effect of temporal resolution on qualitative detection and quantitative analysis of histopathologically proven prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin M Ream; Ankur M Doshi; Diane Dunst; Nainesh Parikh; Max X Kong; James S Babb; Samir S Taneja; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance.

Authors:  J P Radtke; S Boxler; T H Kuru; M B Wolf; C D Alt; I V Popeneciu; S Steinemann; C Huettenbrink; C Bergstraesser-Gasch; T Klein; C Kesch; M Roethke; N Becker; W Roth; H-P Schlemmer; M Hohenfellner; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 9.  Current role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Romaric Loffroy; Olivier Chevallier; Morgan Moulin; Sylvain Favelier; Pierre-Yves Genson; Pierre Pottecher; Gilles Crehange; Alexandre Cochet; Luc Cormier
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

10.  Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Shoshana B Ginsburg; Ahmad Algohary; Shivani Pahwa; Vikas Gulani; Lee Ponsky; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Pekka Taimen; Robert Villani; Phillip Stricker; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.