Literature DB >> 3189674

Long-term evaluation of knee stability and function following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

R A Harter1, L R Osternig, K M Singer, S L James, R L Larson, D C Jones.   

Abstract

Currently used measures of knee stability and function for ACL reconstructed knees have not gained universal acceptance. Clinical test results often are given more value than the patient's subjective evaluation of the surgical outcome. This study was designed to identify specific knee stability and function variables that were most predictive of the patient's rating of knee function following one of two types of combined (intraarticular and extraarticular) ACL reconstruction procedures. Individual measures of knee stability and function were also evaluated for differences between contralateral operated and nonoperated limbs. Postoperative and healthy contralateral knees of 51 male and female patients aged 18 to 49 years (mean, 23.7 years) were evaluated on a battery of tests at an average of 48.0 months after surgery (range, 24 to 101 months). All subjects possessed a normal contralateral knee for comparative purposes. The results of this retrospective study indicated that the variables selected were not highly correlated with, nor could they effectively predict, the patients' perceptions of postoperative knee status as measured by the Knee Function Rating Form (KFR). Statistically significant differences (P less than 0.001) between operated and nonoperated knees were found for 9 of 11 variables analyzed. The data suggest that patients' perceptions of postoperative knee status were independent of the results of static and dynamic clinical tests commonly used to assess knee stability and function. Postoperative deficits of up to 30% between the surgically reconstructed and normal contralateral knees on specific measures of knee stability and function did not greatly influence the patients' perceptions of knee function. Development of new, more specific dynamic tests may be necessary before stronger relationships between clinical test results and patients' perceptions of knee status in the ACL reconstructed knee can be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3189674     DOI: 10.1177/036354658801600502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  29 in total

1.  Strength, Functional Outcome, and Postural Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Carl G Mattacola; David H Perrin; Bruce M Gansneder; Joe H Gieck; Ethan N Saliba; Frank C McCue
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of stress-shielding on maturation of the mid-substance and ligament-bone junction of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament in rabbits.

Authors:  S Itoh; T Muneta; K Shinomiya; S Ichinose
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  The role of static and dynamic rotatory laxity testing in evaluating ACL injury.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Romain Seil; Stefano Zaffagnini; Scott Tashman; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Navigated intra-articular ACL reconstruction with additional extra-articular tenodesis using the same hamstring graft.

Authors:  Philippe D Colombet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision.

Authors:  Christophe Trojani; Abderahmane Sbihi; Patrick Djian; Jean-François Potel; Christophe Hulet; Frank Jouve; Christophe Bussière; François-Paul Ehkirch; Gilles Burdin; Frédéric Dubrana; Philippe Beaufils; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Vincent Chassaing; Philippe Colombet; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Alejandro I Marcano; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ramon Cugat; Kevin W Farmer; Michael W Moser
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

7.  Inter-rater reliability of Rolimeter measurements between anterior cruciate ligament injured and normal contra lateral knees.

Authors:  Maria G Papandreou; Emmanuel Antonogiannakis; Christos Karabalis; Konstantinos Karliaftis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Kinematic study following double-bundle, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Bong Hyun Bae; Sang Jin Park; Taek Rim Yoon; Sang Gwon Cho; Jae Joon Lee; Myung Sun Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Knee hyperextension does not adversely affect dynamic in vivo kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Tom Gale; Elmar Herbst; Yasutaka Tashiro; James J Irrgang; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu; William Anderst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Functional outcome measures for knee dysfunction assessment.

Authors:  D R Keskula; J B Duncan; V L Davis; P W Finley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.