Literature DB >> 16558382

Functional outcome measures for knee dysfunction assessment.

D R Keskula1, J B Duncan, V L Davis, P W Finley.   

Abstract

Maximizing the functional abilities of the individual is the primary objective of any therapeutic intervention. Functional outcome data are valuable to those involved in the care of the athlete because such data provides information that helps facilitate the clinical decision-making process and, therefore, helps insure a safe and efficient return to athletics. Functional outcome measures also provide useful data for assessing therapeutic intervention efficacy. The clinician/researcher must consider various factors when selecting an appropriate outcome measure, such as: the patient population, pathology, specific test parameters, psychometric properties, and practicality of the measure. The primary purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with guidelines for either assessing existing measures or developing new measures of functional outcomes for use in clinical practice and research.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 16558382      PMCID: PMC1318439     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  17 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of outcomes of health intervention.

Authors:  C D Jenkins
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Assessment of functional tests after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  M A Risberg; A Ekeland
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 3.  Using health-related quality of life measures in physical therapy outcomes research.

Authors:  A M Jette
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1993-08

4.  Validity and reliability of a new assessment of lower-extremity dysfunction.

Authors:  U Oberg; B Oberg; T Oberg
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-09

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of functional tests in patients with total joint replacement.

Authors:  R K Shields; L J Enloe; R E Evans; K B Smith; S D Steckel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1995-03

7.  The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee.

Authors:  K E Wilk; W T Romaniello; S M Soscia; C A Arrigo; J R Andrews
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction.

Authors:  D S Barrett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

9.  Subjective evaluation of function following moderately accelerated rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees.

Authors:  V Draper; C Ladd
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  A performance test to monitor rehabilitation and evaluate anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm; M Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessment and evaluation of predisposing factors to anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  C M Bonci
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Functional performance 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict return to participation in the same preinjury activity level 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Authors:  Zakariya Nawasreh; David Logerstedt; Kathleen Cummer; Michael Axe; May Arna Risberg; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Self-reported knee function can identify athletes who fail return-to-activity criteria up to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a delaware-oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  David Logerstedt; Stephanie Di Stasi; Hege Grindem; Andrew Lynch; Ingrid Eitzen; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Hop tests correlate with IKDC and KOOS at minimum of 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Emily K Reinke; Kurt P Spindler; Dawn Lorring; Morgan H Jones; Leah Schmitz; David C Flanigan; Angel Qi An; Amanda R Quiram; Emily Preston; Michael Martin; Bettina Schroeder; Richard D Parker; Christopher C Kaeding; Lynn Borzi; Angela Pedroza; Laura J Huston; Frank E Harrell; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Normative data for hop tests in high school and collegiate basketball and soccer players.

Authors:  Betsy A Myers; Walter L Jenkins; Clyde Killian; Peter Rundquist
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10

Review 6.  Functional Performance Testing and Patient Reported Outcomes following ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Adel Almangoush; Lee Herrington
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-11-16

7.  RELIABILITY OF STRENGTH AND PERFORMANCE TESTING MEASURES AND THEIR ABILITY TO DIFFERENTIATE PERSONS WITH AND WITHOUT SHOULDER SYMPTOMS.

Authors:  Aaron Sciascia; Tim Uhl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.