Literature DB >> 12937583

Strength, Functional Outcome, and Postural Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Carl G Mattacola1, David H Perrin, Bruce M Gansneder, Joe H Gieck, Ethan N Saliba, Frank C McCue.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare postural stability, single-leg hop, and isokinetic strength measurements in subjects after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with an age- and activity-matched control group. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Subjects reported to a sports medicine/athletic training research laboratory for testing. Subjects reported for one testing session for a total test time of 1 hour.
SUBJECTS: Twenty subjects with ACL reconstructions (ACLRs) and 20 age- and activity-matched controls were selected to participate in this study. An arthroscopically assisted central one-third bone-patellar tendon procedure was used to repair the ACLs. MEASUREMENTS: We measured concentric and eccentric peak torque (Nm) measurements of the knee extensors and flexors at 120 degrees and 240 degrees /second on an isokinetic dynamometer. Unilateral and bilateral dynamic postural stability was measured as a stability index in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral planes with the Biodex Stability System. We tested single-leg hop for distance to measure objective function.
RESULTS: We found no significant difference between the ACLR and control subjects for stability index or knee-flexion peak torque scores. On the single-leg hop for distance, the ACLR subjects hopped significantly shorter distances with the involved limb than the uninvolved limb. Furthermore, the ACLR subjects' single-leg hop distance was significantly less when the involved limb was compared with the control-group matched involved limb, and the ACLR subjects performed significantly better when the uninvolved limb was compared with the control-group matched uninvolved limb. The ACLR subjects produced significantly greater torque in the uninvolved leg than in the involved leg. In addition, the peak torque was significantly less for the involved limb in the ACLR group when compared with the matched involved limb of the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: After ACLR (mean = 18 +/- 10 months), single-leg hop-for-distance scores and quadriceps strength were not within normal limits when compared with the contralateral limb. Our results suggest that bilateral and single-limb postural stability in the ACLR group was not significantly different than the control group at an average follow-up of 18 months after surgery.

Year:  2002        PMID: 12937583      PMCID: PMC164354     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  30 in total

1.  1998 Basmajian Student Award Paper: Movement patterns after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a comparison of patients who compensate well for the injury and those who require operative stabilization.

Authors:  K S Rudolph; M E Eastlack; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Motor performance in different dynamic tests in knee rehabilitation.

Authors:  K Pfeifer; W Banzer
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Evaluation of single-leg standing following anterior cruciate ligament surgery and rehabilitation.

Authors:  E L Harrison; N Duenkel; R Dunlop; G Russell
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-03

Review 4.  Review of the afferent neural system of the knee and its contribution to motor learning.

Authors:  J Nyland; T Brosky; D Currier; A Nitz; D Caborn
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement.

Authors:  F R Noyes; D L Butler; L E Paulos; E S Grood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Factors affecting stabilometry recordings of single limb stance.

Authors:  H Tropp; J Ekstrand; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Assessment of quadriceps/hamstring strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J L Seto; A S Orofino; M C Morrissey; J M Medeiros; W J Mason
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction.

Authors:  D S Barrett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

10.  Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  R A Sachs; D M Daniel; M L Stone; R F Garfein
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  64 in total

1.  Knee kinematics following acl reconstruction in females; the effect of vision on performance during a cutting task.

Authors:  Jaynie Bjornaraa; Richard P Di Fabio
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Recent advances following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: rehabilitation perspectives : Critical reviews in rehabilitation medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Manske; Daniel Prohaska; Brennen Lucas
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

3.  Static and dynamic postural control in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls.

Authors:  Farshid Mohammadi; Mahyar Salavati; Behnam Akhbari; Masood Mazaheri; Mojdeh Khorrami; Hossein Negahban
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Measurement and evaluation of dynamic joint stability of the knee and ankle after injury.

Authors:  Erik A Wikstrom; Mark D Tillman; Terese L Chmielewski; Paul A Borsa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Laura C Schmitt; Jensen L Brent; Kevin R Ford; Kim D Barber Foss; Bradley J Scherer; Robert S Heidt; Jon G Divine; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction.

Authors:  Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  High intensity running results in an impaired neuromuscular response in ACL reconstructed individuals.

Authors:  Kostas Patras; Giorgos Ziogas; Stavros Ristanis; Elias Tsepis; Nicholas Stergiou; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Neuromuscular efficiency of the vastus medialis obliquus and postural balance in professional soccer athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Shalimá Figueirêdo Chaves; Natália Pereira Marques; Rômulo Lemos E Silva; Nahra Santos Rebouças; Luise Monteiro de Freitas; Pedro Olavo de Paula Lima; Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-09-10

10.  Incidence of Second ACL Injuries 2 Years After Primary ACL Reconstruction and Return to Sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno; Mitchell J Rauh; Laura C Schmitt; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.