Literature DB >> 31893568

Responses of New Zealand forest birds to management of introduced mammals.

Nyree Fea1, Wayne Linklater2, Stephen Hartley1.   

Abstract

Over the past 1000 years New Zealand has lost 40-50% of its bird species, and over half of these extinctions are attributable to predation by introduced mammals. Populations of many extant forest bird species continue to be depredated by mammals, especially rats, possums, and mustelids. The management history of New Zealand's forests over the past 50 years presents a unique opportunity because a varied program of mammalian predator control has created a replicated management experiment. We conducted a meta-analysis of population-level responses of forest birds to different levels of mammal control recorded across New Zealand. We collected data from 32 uniquely treated sites and 20 extant bird species representing a total of 247 population responses to 3 intensities of invasive mammal control (zero, low, and high). The treatments varied from eradication of invasive mammals via ground-based techniques to periodic suppression of mammals via aerially sown toxin. We modeled population-level responses of birds according to key life history attributes to determine the biological processes that influence species' responses to management. Large endemic species, such as the Kaka (Nestor meridionalis) and New Zealand Pigeon (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae), responded positively at the population level to mammal control in 61 of 77 cases for species ≥20 g compared with 31 positive responses from 78 cases for species <20 g. The Fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa) and Grey Warbler (Gerygone igata), both shallow endemic species, and 4 nonendemic species (Blackbird [Turdus merula], Chaffinch [Fringilla coelebs], Dunnock [Prunella modularis], and Silvereye [Zosterops lateralis]) that arrived in New Zealand in the last 200 years tended to have slight negative or neutral responses to mammal control (59 of 77 cases). Our results suggest that large, deeply endemic forest birds, especially cavity nesters, are most at risk of further decline in the absence of mammal control and, conversely suggest that 6 species apparently tolerate the presence of invasive mammals and may be sensitive to competition from larger endemic birds.
© 2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anidación en cavidades; biodiversidad nativa; bird populations; body size; cavity nesting; control de depredadores; ecosystem management; endemism; endemismo; especies amenazadas; invasive; invasivo; mammalian predator; mamíferos depredadores; manejo de ecosistemas; native biodiversity; poblaciones de aves; predator control; tamaño corporal; threatened species; 可再生能源; 太阳能; 实验设计; 最佳实践; 死亡率; 采样偏差; 野生动物监测; 风能

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31893568      PMCID: PMC7984369          DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  11 in total

1.  Quantifying uncertainty in the potential distribution of an invasive species: climate and the Argentine ant.

Authors:  Stephen Hartley; Richard Harris; Philip J Lester
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 2.  Monitoring for conservation.

Authors:  James D Nichols; Byron K Williams
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss.

Authors:  Tim S Doherty; Alistair S Glen; Dale G Nimmo; Euan G Ritchie; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Effectiveness of predator removal for enhancing bird populations.

Authors:  Rebecca K Smith; Andrew S Pullin; Gavin B Stewart; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Reconstructing past species assemblages reveals the changing patterns and drivers of extinction through time.

Authors:  Lindell Bromham; Robert Lanfear; Phillip Cassey; Gillian Gibb; Marcel Cardillo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact.

Authors:  Franck Courchamp; Jean-Louis Chapuis; Michel Pascal
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2003-08

7.  Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations.

Authors:  Pälvi Salo; Erkki Korpimäki; Peter B Banks; Mikael Nordström; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Alien species as a driver of recent extinctions.

Authors:  Céline Bellard; Phillip Cassey; Tim M Blackburn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Global patterns and drivers of avian extinctions at the species and subspecies level.

Authors:  Judit K Szabo; Nyil Khwaja; Stephen T Garnett; Stuart H M Butchart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predator-Free New Zealand: Conservation Country.

Authors:  James C Russell; John G Innes; Philip H Brown; Andrea E Byrom
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 8.589

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does aerial baiting for controlling feral cats in a heterogeneous landscape confer benefits to a threatened native meso-predator?

Authors:  Russell Palmer; Hannah Anderson; Brooke Richards; Michael D Craig; Lesley Gibson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.