Literature DB >> 14558589

Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact.

Franck Courchamp1, Jean-Louis Chapuis, Michel Pascal.   

Abstract

The invasion of ecosystems by exotic species is currently viewed as one of the most important sources of biodiversity loss. The largest part of this loss occurs on islands, where indigenous species have often evolved in the absence of strong competition, herbivory, parasitism or predation. As a result, introduced species thrive in those optimal insular ecosystems affecting their plant food, competitors or animal prey. As islands are characterised by a high rate of endemism, the impacted populations often correspond to local subspecies or even unique species. One of the most important taxa concerning biological invasions on islands is mammals. A small number of mammal species is responsible for most of the damage to invaded insular ecosystems: rats, cats, goats, rabbits, pigs and a few others. The effect of alien invasive species may be simple or very complex, especially since a large array of invasive species, mammals and others, can be present simultaneously and interact among themselves as well as with the indigenous species. In most cases, introduced species generally have a strong impact and they often are responsible for the impoverishment of the local flora and fauna. The best response to these effects is almost always to control the alien population, either by regularly reducing their numbers, or better still, by eradicating the population as a whole from the island. Several types of methods are currently used: physical (trapping, shooting), chemical (poisoning) and biological (e.g. directed use of diseases). Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, depending on the mammal species targeted. The best strategy is almost always to combine several methods. Whatever the strategy used, its long-term success is critically dependent on solid support from several different areas, including financial support, staff commitment, and public support, to name only a few. In many cases, the elimination of the alien invasive species is followed by a rapid and often spectacular recovery of the impacted local populations. However, in other cases, the removal of the alien is not sufficient for the damaged ecosystem to revert to its former state, and complementary actions, such as species re-introduction, are required. A third situation may be widespread: the sudden removal of the alien species may generate a further disequilibrium, resulting in further or greater damage to the ecosystem. Given the numerous and complex population interactions among island species, it is difficult to predict the outcome of the removal of key species, such as a top predator. This justifies careful pre-control study and preparation prior to initiating the eradication of an alien species, in order to avoid an ecological catastrophe. In addition, long-term monitoring ofthe post-eradication ecosystem is crucial to assess success and prevent reinvasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14558589     DOI: 10.1017/s1464793102006061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  90 in total

1.  Burrowing seabird effects on invertebrate communities in soil and litter are dominated by ecosystem engineering rather than nutrient addition.

Authors:  Kate H Orwin; David A Wardle; David R Towns; Mark G St John; Peter J Bellingham; Chris Jones; Brian M Fitzgerald; Richard G Parrish; Phil O'B Lyver
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Long-term ecological dynamics: reciprocal insights from natural and anthropogenic gradients.

Authors:  Tadashi Fukami; David A Wardle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Modelling population persistence on islands: mammal introductions in the New Zealand archipelago.

Authors:  Richard P Duncan; David M Forsyth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Alien mink predation induces prolonged declines in archipelago amphibians.

Authors:  Markus Ahola; Mikael Nordström; Peter B Banks; Nikolai Laanetu; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The West Indies as a laboratory of biogeography and evolution.

Authors:  Robert Ricklefs; Eldredge Bermingham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss.

Authors:  Tim S Doherty; Alistair S Glen; Dale G Nimmo; Euan G Ritchie; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rescuing ecosystems from extinction cascades through compensatory perturbations.

Authors:  Sagar Sahasrabudhe; Adilson E Motter
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Double impact of sterilizing pathogens: added value of increased life expectancy on pest control effectiveness.

Authors:  Luděk Berec; Daniel Maxin
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Anthropogenic subsidies mitigate environmental variability for insular rodents.

Authors:  Lise Ruffino; James Russell; Eric Vidal
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Buying years to extinction: is compensatory mitigation for marine bycatch a sufficient conservation measure for long-lived seabirds?

Authors:  José Manuel Igual; Giacomo Tavecchia; Stephanie Jenouvrier; Manuela G Forero; Daniel Oro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.