Literature DB >> 3189285

Validation of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing occupational and environmental exposures of pregnant women.

B Eskenazi1, K Pearson.   

Abstract

The present investigation sought to determine whether a self-administered questionnaire could be used to obtain occupational information from pregnant women attending the obstetrical clinics at the University of California, San Francisco from July to November 1986. The authors compared the accuracy of responses of 57 women on the self-administered questionnaire with those obtained on a detailed clinical interview by an occupational health professional. The self-administered questionnaire and the clinical interview included information on the woman's job title, the type of company she worked for, the level of physical activity, her exposures on the job and at home, and her partner's occupation. The authors also examined whether the "validity" of the self-administered questionnaire could be improved on review by an industrial hygienist. The questionnaire took less than 20 minutes to complete, with over 90% of the women answering three-quarters of it. It was "substantially" accurate in obtaining information on number of hours worked during pregnancy, type of shift worked, and stress level in the workplace; exposure to radiation, video display terminals, fumes, gases, and cigarette smoke in the workplace; and exposure to pesticides, paint, and cigarette smoke at home. On those variables for which the responses on the self-administered questionnaire were less accurate, review by the industrial hygienist improved the level of accuracy considerably. These findings suggest that a self-administered questionnaire can be used to obtain valid information from pregnant women attending a prenatal clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3189285     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods.

Authors:  E Tielemans; D Heederik; A Burdorf; R Vermeulen; H Veulemans; H Kromhout; K Hartog
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K Teschke; A F Olshan; J L Daniels; A J De Roos; C G Parks; M Schulz; T L Vaughan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  The relationship between occupational classification and low birth weight in a national sample of white married mothers.

Authors:  S K Virji; E O Talbott
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Spousal abuse against women and its consequences on reproductive health: a study in the urban slums in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Abdus Salam; Abdul Alim; Toshikuni Noguchi
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-01

5.  Assessment of occupational exposure in a population based case-control study: comparing postal questionnaires with personal interviews.

Authors:  B M Blatter; N Roeleveld; G A Zielhuis; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Work activity in pregnancy, preventive measures, and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant.

Authors:  Agathe Croteau; Sylvie Marcoux; Chantal Brisson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Attributable risk in men in two French case-control studies on mesothelioma and asbestos.

Authors:  Aude Lacourt; Patrick Rolland; Céline Gramond; Philippe Astoul; Soizick Chamming's; Stéphane Ducamp; Catherine Frenay; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; Anabelle Gilg Soit Ilg; Ellen Imbernon; Nolwenn Le Stang; Jean Claude Pairon; Marcel Goldberg; Yuriko Iwatsubo; Louis-Rachid Salmi; Patrick Brochard
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  A screening questionnaire for occupational and hobby exposures during pregnancy.

Authors:  C M Zachek; J M Schwartz; M Glasser; E DeMicco; T J Woodruff
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 9.  Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Danielle Symons Downs; Emily E Pearce
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  A study of handling cytotoxic drugs and risk of birth defects in offspring of female veterinarians.

Authors:  Adeleh Shirangi; Carol Bower; C D'Arcy J Holman; David B Preen; Neville Bruce
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.