Literature DB >> 22882792

Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability.

Kelly R Evenson1, Lisa Chasan-Taber, Danielle Symons Downs, Emily E Pearce.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies and surveillance systems of pregnant women often rely on collection of physical activity through self-report. This systematic review identified and summarised self-reported physical activity assessments with evidence for validity and reliability among pregnant women.
METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles published through 2011 were included if they assessed validity and/or reliability of an interviewer- or self-administered physical activity questionnaire or diary among pregnant women.
RESULTS: We identified 15 studies, including 12 studies that assessed questionnaires and 4 studies that assessed diaries, conducted in Australia, Finland, Norway, the U.K., the U.S. and Vietnam. For questionnaires, 92% (11/12) assessed mode, all assessed frequency and/or duration and 58% (7/12) collected information on perceived intensity. All but one study (92%) assessed validity of the questionnaires. Questionnaires compared with objective measures (accelerometers, pedometers) ranged from slight to fair agreement, while comparison with other self-reported measures ranged from substantial to almost perfect agreement. Five studies (42%) assessed test-retest reliability of the questionnaires, ranging from substantial to almost perfect agreement. The four studies on diaries were all assessed for validity against objective measures, ranging from slight to substantial agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: Selection of valid and reliable physical activity measures that collect information on dose (type, frequency, duration, intensity) is recommended to increase precision and accuracy in detecting associations of physical activity with maternal and fetal outcomes.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22882792      PMCID: PMC3419488          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  59 in total

1.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.

Authors:  D Hendelman; K Miller; C Baggett; E Debold; P Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Cultural adaptation of physical activity self-report instruments.

Authors:  Elva M Arredondo; Tamar Mendelson; Christina Holub; Nancy Espinoza; Simon Marshall
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2012-01

3.  Measuring physical activity during pregnancy.

Authors:  Glenda Lindseth; Patty Vari
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Statistical methods for the validation of questionnaires--discrepancy between theory and practice.

Authors:  M E Schmidt; K Steindorf
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  The potential value of a short self-completion questionnaire for the assessment of habitual physical activity in pregnancy.

Authors:  H I Wildschut; L M Harker; C J Riddoch
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 6.  A review of physical activity patterns in pregnant women and their relationship to psychological health.

Authors:  Mélanie S Poudevigne; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Activity pattern and energy expenditure due to physical activity before and during pregnancy in healthy Swedish women.

Authors:  Marie Lof; Elisabet Forsum
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 8.  Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application.

Authors:  Kirsten Corder; Søren Brage; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.294

9.  Objectively measured physical activity during pregnancy: a study in obese and overweight women.

Authors:  Catherine McParlin; Stephen C Robson; Peter W G Tennant; Hervé Besson; Judith Rankin; Ashley J Adamson; Mark S Pearce; Ruth Bell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Physical activity and pregnancy: past and present evidence and future recommendations.

Authors:  Danielle Symons Downs; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Kelly R Evenson; Jenn Leiferman; SeonAe Yeo
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  39 in total

1.  Association between diet quality measured by the Healthy Food Intake Index and later risk of gestational diabetes-a secondary analysis of the RADIEL trial.

Authors:  J Meinila; A Valkama; S B Koivusalo; K Rönö; H Kautiainen; J Lindström; B Stach-Lempinen; J G Eriksson; M Erkkola
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Evidence-based recommendations for energy intake in pregnant women with obesity.

Authors:  Jasper Most; Marshall St Amant; Daniel S Hsia; Abby D Altazan; Diana M Thomas; L Anne Gilmore; Porsha M Vallo; Robbie A Beyl; Eric Ravussin; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Linking nontraditional physical activity and preterm delivery in urban African-American women.

Authors:  Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Kristy Hegner; Dawn P Misra
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

4.  Reliability and Validity of a Chinese-Translated Version of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Mi Xiang; Massayuki Konishi; Huanhuan Hu; Masaki Takahashi; Wenbi Fan; Mio Nishimaki; Karina Ando; Hyeon-Ki Kim; Hiroki Tabata; Takashi Arao; Shizuo Sakamoto
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-09

5.  The Need to Objectively Measure Physical Activity During Pregnancy: Considerations for Clinical Research and Public Health Impact.

Authors:  Eva Guérin; Zachary M Ferraro; Kristi B Adamo; Denis Prud'homme
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-05

6.  Exercise During the First Trimester and Infant Size at Birth: Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Causal Risk Difference.

Authors:  Samantha F Ehrlich; Romain S Neugebauer; Juanran Feng; Monique M Hedderson; Assiamira Ferrara
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Moderate intensity sports and exercise is associated with glycaemic control in women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  S F Ehrlich; M M Hedderson; S D Brown; B Sternfeld; L Chasan-Taber; J Feng; J Adams; J Ching; Y Crites; C P Quesenberry; A Ferrara
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 6.041

8.  Association of physical activity in the past year and immediately after in vitro fertilization on pregnancy.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Kathryn C Calhoun; Amy H Herring; David Pritchard; Fang Wen; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Changes in physical activity among postpartum overweight and obese women: results from the KAN-DO Study.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Rebecca J N Brouwer; Truls Østbye
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2013

10.  Physical activity before and during pregnancy and risk of abnormal glucose tolerance among Hispanic women.

Authors:  L Chasan-Taber; M Silveira; K E Lynch; P Pekow; B Braun; J E Manson; C G Solomon; G Markenson
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 6.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.