Literature DB >> 31247109

A screening questionnaire for occupational and hobby exposures during pregnancy.

C M Zachek1, J M Schwartz2, M Glasser3, E DeMicco2, T J Woodruff2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occupational and environmental exposures during the prenatal period may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and lifelong health effects. Yet, identification and evaluation of these potential hazards is lacking in routine obstetric care. AIMS: To assess the feasibility of incorporating a self-administered occupational and environmental exposure questionnaire into obstetric clinics.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey assessed prenatal clinic patients at a public hospital who were currently employed and <20 weeks gestation. Questionnaires evaluated job characteristics, workplace and hobby exposures, protective equipment use and symptoms during pregnancy.
RESULTS: Of 69 participants (96% response rate), 46% were predominantly Spanish-speaking. Primary occupations were caregiver (16%), cleaner (14%) and administrative assistant (14%). Overall, 93% were exposed to a workplace hazard, with most participants reporting physical stressors (82%) or organic solvent exposure (78%). Most women (74%) used some personal protective equipment. Nearly half (54%) reported at least one non-pregnancy symptom, and 52% were referred for follow-up with an occupational medicine practitioner. Household and hobby-related chemical exposures were common in our sample (91%). We observed moderate consistency between job task and chemical use responses: 67-99% of intentionally redundant questions were fully or partially matched. Closed- compared to open-ended activity questions identified a higher proportion of physical stressors (82% versus 12%) and cleaning product (76% versus 30%) exposures.
CONCLUSIONS: A self-administered questionnaire is an effective screening tool for identifying women with occupational and hobby-related exposures during pregnancy. Consistent incorporation of exposure assessment into prenatal care can improve clinical communications and early interventions for at-risk pregnant women.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical exposures; occupational health; pregnancy; questionnaire; screening; workplace hazards

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31247109      PMCID: PMC6939873          DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqz094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of assessment methods for pesticide exposure in a case-control interview study.

Authors:  J L Daniels; A F Olshan; K Teschke; I Hertz-Picciotto; D A Savitz; J Blatt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Reproductive environmental health.

Authors:  Patrice Sutton; Linda C Giudice; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  Recognizing occupational illnesses and injuries.

Authors:  Oyebode A Taiwo; Ben Hur P Mobo; Linda Cantley
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  A rapid questionnaire assessment of environmental exposures to pregnant women in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.

Authors:  B Eskenazi; A Bradman; D Finkton; M Purwar; J A Noble; R Pang; O Burnham; L Cheikh Ismail; F Farhi; F C Barros; A Lambert; A T Papageorghiou; M Carvalho; Y A Jaffer; E Bertino; M G Gravett; D G Altman; E O Ohuma; S H Kennedy; Z A Bhutta; J Villar
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 5.  Occupational risk factors and reproductive health of women.

Authors:  Irene Figà-Talamanca
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 6.  Accuracy, comprehensibility, and use of material safety data sheets: a review.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Nicol; A Christie Hurrell; Desy Wahyuni; William McDowall; Winnie Chu
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  The Role of Healthcare Professionals in Environmental Health and Fertility Decision-Making.

Authors:  Ellen Sweeney
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2017-02-02

8.  Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.

Authors:  Sarah A Vogel; Jody A Roberts
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  An occupational reproductive research agenda for the third millennium.

Authors:  Christina C Lawson; Teresa M Schnorr; George P Daston; Barbara Grajewski; Michele Marcus; Melissa McDiarmid; Eisuke Murono; Sally D Perreault; Steven M Schrader; Michael Shelby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Counseling patients on preventing prenatal environmental exposures--a mixed-methods study of obstetricians.

Authors:  Naomi E Stotland; Patrice Sutton; Jessica Trowbridge; Dylan S Atchley; Jeanne Conry; Leonardo Trasande; Barbara Gerbert; Annemarie Charlesworth; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Interventions Addressing Social Needs in Perinatal Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana M Reyes; Precious W Akanyirige; Danielle Wishart; Rabih Dahdouh; Maria R Young; Araceli Estrada; Carmenisha Ward; Cindy Cruz Alvarez; Molly Beestrum; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-03-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.