| Literature DB >> 31892153 |
Shantanu Sharma1,2, Faiyaz Akhtar1, Rajesh Kumar Singh1, Sunil Mehra1.
Abstract
Health education materials such as flipbooks enhance learning and deliver key messages in a captivating mode. Validation of such materials is crucial to ensuring implementation fidelity. We conducted a study to achieve two objectives: (a) to develop two flipbooks, one each for adolescents and young married women (YMW); (b) to validate the flipbooks using five parameters, namely, content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity, relevance, and face validity. The study was a part of a community-based peer-led intervention on health, nutrition, and hygiene. The content validity and relevance were assessed by interviewing outreach workers (ORWs, n = 42) using self-administered five-point Likert scale-based tools. A pre- and post-intervention assessment of knowledge among adolescents (n = 100) and YMW (n = 50) across six out of 13 intervention sites was done to evaluate the construct validity. The two flipbooks contained 12 structured sessions with five key messages per session, in addition to illustrations, discussion points, and theme-based stories at the end of each session. The content and relevancy indices were ranked above 80% by ORW. There was a statistically significant increase in the knowledge scores of adolescents (p < 0.001) and YMW (p < 0.001) post intervention. The validation process helps in assessing the relevance and appropriateness of the education content for greater acceptance and responsiveness by the users.Entities:
Keywords: health communication; health promotion; process assessment; teaching materials; validation studies; vulnerable populations
Year: 2019 PMID: 31892153 PMCID: PMC7151179 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8010008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Parameters for the validation of flipbooks (information, education, and communication (IEC) tool).
| S. No. | Parameters of Validation | Purpose | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Face validity | Does the flipbook appear to achieve what it intends to achieve? | Interview/feedback |
| 2 | Content Validity | Does the flipbook actually explain the topics effectively? Was the tool developed with its content in a user-friendly manner? | 12-item-long Likert-based scale |
| 3 | Construct Validity | Is there an improvement in knowledge after the session was taken with the help of the flipbook? | Pre-post intervention assessment |
| 4 | Concurrent Validity | Does the new flipbook add on or supplement the existing tools already given by the agencies/ministries? | Interviews/feedback |
| 5 | Relevance of the tool | Do the different topics and strategies adopted in the flipbook hold relevance to the needs of the communities? | 12-item-long Likert-based tool |
Figure 1The cover page and the table of contents page in the flipbook for adolescents (“Yauvan”). The table of contents displays the name of the 12 structured sessions in the flipbook. The flipbook is in Hindi (local language). The instructions of how to use the book are shown beside the table of contents page.
Figure 2The cover page and the table of contents page in the flipbook for young married women (“Sangini”). The table of contents displays the name of the 12 structured sessions in the flipbook. The flipbook is in Hindi (local language). The instructions of how to use the book are shown beside the table of contents page.
Evaluation of adequacy of agreement on the flipbook content and layout (content validity; I—index). BCC—behavior change communication.
| S. No. | Items | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The content covered presents relevant information on the health and nutrition needs of the population | 42 (1.00) | 42 (1.00) |
| 2 | Texts seem clear and comprehensive and match the logic, language, and experience of facilitators. | 40 (0.95) | 39 (0.93) |
| 3 | Illustrations or photos or pictures used have a suitable design for understanding. | 38 (0.90) | 35 (0.83) |
| 4 | Illustrations or photos or pictures presented are necessary for understanding the content. | 40 (0.95) | 36 (0.85) |
| 5 | Illustrations and texts motivate the outreach workers to understand the proposed theme. | 41 (0.97) | 39 (0.93) |
| 6 | Applicability of flipbook in BCC sessions | 41 (0.97) | 40 (0.95) |
| 7 | The key messages, in the end, are useful as take-away messages. | 41 (0.97) | 41 (0.97) |
| 8 | The questions in each chapter are easy to understand and help generate inquisitiveness among participants to know the topic. | 42 (1.00) | 39 (0.93) |
| 9 | The stories provided at the end of each session are useful in translating the needs and situations with the application of knowledge. | 38 (0.90) | 41 (0.97) |
| 10 | The two-hour duration of each session and the time allotted for the session are enough and sufficient. | 35 (0.83) | 37 (0.88) |
| 11 | The content is cultural-, gender-, and age-appropriate. | 40 (0.95) | 36 (0.85) |
| 12 | Desired key behavior change points are stressed in the text or emphasized. | 40 (0.95) | 42 (1.00) |
| Mean index score | 0.94 | 0.92 |
* Number of participants who agreed to the adequacy of each item; ** I: index.
Construct validity scores at pre- and post-intervention stage among adolescent girls and boys (n = 100).
| Knowledge Sections | Adolescent Girls ( | Adolescent Boys ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of the Sections | Maximum Score | Pre-Test Scores | Post-Test Scores | Pre-Test Scores | Post-Test Scores |
| Reproductive health * | 24 | 10.2 (4.1) | 17.0 (2.9) | 10.6 (4.2) | 20.7 (2.2) |
| Mental health * | 6 | 2.3 (1.7) | 4.0 (1.3) | 3.0 (1.9) | 5.5 (0.8) |
| Nutrition † | 10 | 7.1 (2.5) | 8.0 (1.9) | 5.8 (2.9) | 9.6 (0.7) |
| Miscellaneous * | 15 | 9.9 (3.0) | 12.9 (1.2) | 9.9 (3.6) | 13.9 (0.8) |
| Total score * | 55 | 29.5 (7.8) | 42.0 (5.1) | 29.3 (10.4) | 49.8 (3.7) |
Abbreviation: SD: standard deviation; * p-value < 0.001 for both boys and girls; † p-value < 0.05 for girls and <0.001 for boys.
Construct validity scores at pre- and post-intervention stage among young married women (n = 50).
| Knowledge Sections | Young Married Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name of the Sections | Maximum Score | Pre-Test Scores | Post-Test Scores |
| Reproductive health * | 11 | 5.0 (1.9) | 6.7 (1.7) |
| Pre-conception care * | 8 | 4.2 (2.4) | 5.8 (1.0) |
| Miscellaneous * | 7 | 3.3 (2.3) | 6.0 (0.9) |
| Total score * | 26 | 12.7 (5.5) | 18.7 (2.5) |
Abbreviation: SD: standard deviation; * p-value < 0.001.